In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:40:29 -0600, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

Nice bumper sticker.

wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

What did you expect with big fat over weight over spending government?
Goverment of size never has cared about people, it is about giving the
people the minimum to be happy, while supporting the big government.
That isn't compasion or caring, just the way they operate.
Understanding this helps one understand government.

Case in point, with debt spending so high, and the economy in such sick
shape, why does the government not defer health care for 10 years? Or
why did they not do this 10 years ago? Why now?

Simple, tax greed. If government gets the revenue, they can slide the
service levels down, inclrease your taxes as the rouse and government
has a big time new source of money from the people. In effect, skiming
health care cash flow for fat government. Government know it can't into
perpetuity create ponzi money and they want revenue!

The real reason why health care comes up now is revenue. Government
wants more of your wealth.

On Nov 8, 11:47*am, jps wrote:
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:40:29 -0600, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous.../JCTletter1105....

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. *And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

Nice bumper sticker.

Yes, it would be. But don't take it so hard that you didn't think of
it first.

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:26:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

What did you expect with big fat over weight over spending government?
Goverment of size never has cared about people, it is about giving the
people the minimum to be happy, while supporting the big government.
That isn't compasion or caring, just the way they operate.
Understanding this helps one understand government.

Case in point, with debt spending so high, and the economy in such sick
shape, why does the government not defer health care for 10 years? Or
why did they not do this 10 years ago? Why now?

Simple, tax greed. If government gets the revenue, they can slide the
service levels down, inclrease your taxes as the rouse and government
has a big time new source of money from the people. In effect, skiming
health care cash flow for fat government. Government know it can't into
perpetuity create ponzi money and they want revenue!

The real reason why health care comes up now is revenue. Government
wants more of your wealth.

And what were you saying when Bush was starting dubious wars?

Yes, those are good investments?

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:50:41 -0800, jps wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:26:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

What did you expect with big fat over weight over spending government?
Goverment of size never has cared about people, it is about giving the
people the minimum to be happy, while supporting the big government.
That isn't compasion or caring, just the way they operate.
Understanding this helps one understand government.

Case in point, with debt spending so high, and the economy in such sick
shape, why does the government not defer health care for 10 years? Or
why did they not do this 10 years ago? Why now?

Simple, tax greed. If government gets the revenue, they can slide the
service levels down, inclrease your taxes as the rouse and government
has a big time new source of money from the people. In effect, skiming
health care cash flow for fat government. Government know it can't into
perpetuity create ponzi money and they want revenue!

The real reason why health care comes up now is revenue. Government
wants more of your wealth.

And what were you saying when Bush was starting dubious wars?

Yes, those are good investments?

Actually, that would make a good bumper sticker. It would go
something like this:

"I realize that this is an informal fallacy called a red herring
argument, and I understand that it is an illegitimate argument because
it is not germane to the argument at hand; however, being that it is a
convenient argument capable of effectively diverting from the argument
at hand, and I'm too lazy to (or it's too much of an inconvenience, or
I'm not a deep thinker), I must ask with all due diligence and with
little respect to sound argumentation, 'And what were you saying when
Bush was starting dubious wars? Yes, those are good investments?'
Honk if you love red herring!"

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:20:13 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:50:41 -0800, jps wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:26:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

What did you expect with big fat over weight over spending government?
Goverment of size never has cared about people, it is about giving the
people the minimum to be happy, while supporting the big government.
That isn't compasion or caring, just the way they operate.
Understanding this helps one understand government.

Case in point, with debt spending so high, and the economy in such sick
shape, why does the government not defer health care for 10 years? Or
why did they not do this 10 years ago? Why now?

Simple, tax greed. If government gets the revenue, they can slide the
service levels down, inclrease your taxes as the rouse and government
has a big time new source of money from the people. In effect, skiming
health care cash flow for fat government. Government know it can't into
perpetuity create ponzi money and they want revenue!

The real reason why health care comes up now is revenue. Government
wants more of your wealth.

And what were you saying when Bush was starting dubious wars?

Yes, those are good investments?

Actually, that would make a good bumper sticker. It would go
something like this:

"I realize that this is an informal fallacy called a red herring
argument, and I understand that it is an illegitimate argument because
it is not germane to the argument at hand; however, being that it is a
convenient argument capable of effectively diverting from the argument
at hand, and I'm too lazy to (or it's too much of an inconvenience, or
I'm not a deep thinker), I must ask with all due diligence and with
little respect to sound argumentation, 'And what were you saying when
Bush was starting dubious wars? Yes, those are good investments?'
Honk if you love red herring!"

You need to look up the definition of red herring.

You cannot bitch about bleeding money on health care if you had
absolutely no problem with spending even more on bombs and tax cuts.

What did the wars do for our country?

What will health care reform do for our country?

Where would you invest, in bombs?

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:20:13 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:50:41 -0800, jps wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:26:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

What did you expect with big fat over weight over spending government?
Goverment of size never has cared about people, it is about giving the
people the minimum to be happy, while supporting the big government.
That isn't compasion or caring, just the way they operate.
Understanding this helps one understand government.

Case in point, with debt spending so high, and the economy in such sick
shape, why does the government not defer health care for 10 years? Or
why did they not do this 10 years ago? Why now?

Simple, tax greed. If government gets the revenue, they can slide the
service levels down, inclrease your taxes as the rouse and government
has a big time new source of money from the people. In effect, skiming
health care cash flow for fat government. Government know it can't into
perpetuity create ponzi money and they want revenue!

The real reason why health care comes up now is revenue. Government
wants more of your wealth.

And what were you saying when Bush was starting dubious wars?

Yes, those are good investments?

Actually, that would make a good bumper sticker. It would go
something like this:

"I realize that this is an informal fallacy called a red herring
argument, and I understand that it is an illegitimate argument because
it is not germane to the argument at hand; however, being that it is a
convenient argument capable of effectively diverting from the argument
at hand, and I'm too lazy to (or it's too much of an inconvenience, or
I'm not a deep thinker), I must ask with all due diligence and with
little respect to sound argumentation, 'And what were you saying when
Bush was starting dubious wars? Yes, those are good investments?'
Honk if you love red herring!"

I do.

John Herring

Now please stop taking my name in vain.

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:26:49 -0800, jps wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:20:13 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:50:41 -0800, jps wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:26:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:54:03 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

In the Democrats own words....

http://republicans.waysandmeans.hous...tter110509.pdf

Justice has lost its meaning in our culture of government. And
compassion has lost its meaning as well.

What did you expect with big fat over weight over spending government?
Goverment of size never has cared about people, it is about giving the
people the minimum to be happy, while supporting the big government.
That isn't compasion or caring, just the way they operate.
Understanding this helps one understand government.

Case in point, with debt spending so high, and the economy in such sick
shape, why does the government not defer health care for 10 years? Or
why did they not do this 10 years ago? Why now?

Simple, tax greed. If government gets the revenue, they can slide the
service levels down, inclrease your taxes as the rouse and government
has a big time new source of money from the people. In effect, skiming
health care cash flow for fat government. Government know it can't into
perpetuity create ponzi money and they want revenue!

The real reason why health care comes up now is revenue. Government
wants more of your wealth.

And what were you saying when Bush was starting dubious wars?

Yes, those are good investments?

Actually, that would make a good bumper sticker. It would go
something like this:

"I realize that this is an informal fallacy called a red herring
argument, and I understand that it is an illegitimate argument because
it is not germane to the argument at hand; however, being that it is a
convenient argument capable of effectively diverting from the argument
at hand, and I'm too lazy to (or it's too much of an inconvenience, or
I'm not a deep thinker), I must ask with all due diligence and with
little respect to sound argumentation, 'And what were you saying when
Bush was starting dubious wars? Yes, those are good investments?'
Honk if you love red herring!"

You need to look up the definition of red herring.

You cannot bitch about bleeding money on health care if you had
absolutely no problem with spending even more on bombs and tax cuts.

What did the wars do for our country?

What will health care reform do for our country?

Where would you invest, in bombs?

For you convenience, a definition was included in the content of the
bumper sticker.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access