"Werner" wrote in message
...
On Nov 8, 12:12 pm, "sr" wrote:
The Govenment was sat up to PROTECT our FREEDOMS Not taking them away,
that
is being done in today's world

I guess you have noticed, the legislatures do not know or care about our
constitution, other than taking an oath of office.
Dishonest


Well, it looks increasingly like the jig is up. We can no longer
afford politics as usual.
Dollars in the common treasury are like fish in the common sea -
anyone who can will harvest to extinction. That is why socialism is
fundamentally corrupting and can not work. The Fed is making a lot of
paper fish. This is an illusion of wealth. The real fish are gone.
----
?http://www.capitaldistrict-lp.org/how.shtml




------------"Werner" wrote in message

...
On Nov 7, 11:55 pm, wf3h wrote:





On Nov 7, 9:35 am, Werner wrote:

On Nov 7, 7:07 am, martin wrote: On Nov
7, 5:01 am, "Escape_the_Cult_Now"
wrote:

Democrats Vote to Give Illegal Aliens Unemployment Insurance

...

Odd. Don't Dems also want to prosecute Americans for employing
illegals? Yes. Very strange.

perhaps goldman sachs, with their recently announced average salaries
and bonuses of $700,000, could help. that, courtesy of reagan/bush

Goldman Sachs seems to run finances in all administrations, especially
this one.

i'd rather give it to illegal aliens than legal thieves on wall street

Yet, our glorious government still favors Wall Streeters. Politics as
Usual is all about exploitation.
Governing has become a way to get privileges for some at the expense
of others.
?http://www.capitaldistrict-lp.org/what.shtml
That's why it was supposed to have limited powers. Wasn't America
supposed to be about voluntary agreement instead of ?forced
obedience?http://www.ny.lp.org/choice
=======No sense in hiding you money in a tin can in the backyard, the value
of the dollar in2010,2011, isn't going to be worth the sweat to dig that
hole. Inflation is going to hit us with dbl digits to cover all the
spending, Back to the Carter years. OBAMA is too young to remember the
Carter year, I guess, the same can't be said that had a hand in running up
this debt. Short signed, I guess

"sr" wrote in message
...

"Werner" wrote in message
...
On Nov 8, 12:12 pm, "sr" wrote:
=======No sense in hiding you money in a tin can in the backyard, the
value of the dollar in2010,2011, isn't going to be worth the sweat to dig
that hole. Inflation is going to hit us with dbl digits to cover all the
spending, Back to the Carter years. OBAMA is too young to remember the
Carter year, I guess, the same can't be said that had a hand in running up
this debt. Short signed, I guess



there goes your ignorant, retarded, goober ass again

what the hell is "short signed" ?

you ignorant, retarded,stupid,cross eyed hillbilly idiot

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:57:31 -0500, "sr" wrote:

Well, it looks increasingly like the jig is up. We can no longer
afford politics as usual.
Dollars in the common treasury are like fish in the common sea -
anyone who can will harvest to extinction. That is why socialism is
fundamentally corrupting and can not work. The Fed is making a lot of
paper fish. This is an illusion of wealth. The real fish are gone.

I agree that when money is printed and spent by the same people, this
kind of corruption happens. If you are referring to such
governments as "socialism", you have a point. If you are just
referring to the other party - the one that spends the deficit
differently from your party, then your point is lost.

Do you have a proposal that you believe could work - separating out
the spending from the money printing? Maybe give up the power to
print money to some international body? Or do you prefer that we go
back to gold, and no more IOUs such as loans on paper?

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

On Nov 9, 6:50Â*pm, Howard Brazee wrote:
...

Do you have a proposal that you believe could work - separating out
the spending from the money printing? Â* Â*Maybe give up the power to
print money to some international body? Â* Or do you prefer that we go
back to gold, and no more IOUs such as loans on paper?



Let me try to answer this. The further decisions can be made from the
individual, the greater the corruption, cronyism and politics as
usual. An international body is further from individual control.
Wasn't America supposed to be about voluntary agreement instead of
forced obedience?

http://www.ny.lp.org/choice

There are people who think the 16th&17th Amendments need to be
repealed along with the Federal Reserve Act.







--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison