On Nov 7, 2:33*pm, H the K wrote:
On 11/7/09 2:12 PM, jps wrote:





On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:51:55 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
*wrote:

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:48:07 -0800, *wrote:

An analyst at Fort Hood has determined it would have been impossible
for one person to have inflicted so many wounds even with 2 *20 round
handguns. *They're now considering that some were wounded or killed by
"friendly fire."

Get your facts straight.

Hasan purportedly used a FN Herstal 5-7 Tactical which can hold up to
31 rounds (extended clip/20 round standard) of 5.7 mm NATO high impact
flat trajectory rounds. *It's extremely accurate weapon up to 150
yards - almost as flat and accurate as a high powered rifle. *It's
unknown at this point if he did a reload, but if you're planning mass
murder, it wouldn't be surprizing to have an extra clip or two. *You
can change one of these clips very quickly. *Of course, being a close
quarters/urban combat expert, you wouldn't know that.

The second gun was a Smith and Wesson .357 revolver and it's unknown
if any bullets left the barrel.

Also according to news reports he had taken advanced tactical courses
in pistol and was considered an expert marksman. Add the two together
in a enclosed area where no weapons were allowed your "friendly fire"
concept kind of falls apart.

And Sgt. Munley, trained in close quarter active response was there in
less than three minutes - she had taken him down in less than four.

Just looked at an insider's report- he stopped to reload at least
once, possibly twice. *Assuming 31 round clips, that's 93 rounds - not
quite friendly fire is it moron.

Then again, being a close quarters combat expert, you wouldn't know
any of that.

I'd certainly trust the opinion of a television spokesperson over you.

No matter their expertise. *Sean Hannity would win out over you.

Still accumulating specs on lawnmowers?

Ah, yes...I forgot...Tom claimed for some time that my model of lawn
mower didn't exist. But, of course, it did...and does. * :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry, I and many others here have claimed that your 36 foot Zimmerman
like lobster boat doesn't exist. You proved your lawnmower does, now
how about proof of the lobster boat ownership?

Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 7, 2:33 pm, H the wrote:
On 11/7/09 2:12 PM, jps wrote:





On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:51:55 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:48:07 -0800, wrote:

An analyst at Fort Hood has determined it would have been impossible
for one person to have inflicted so many wounds even with 2 20 round
handguns. They're now considering that some were wounded or killed by
"friendly fire."

Get your facts straight.

Hasan purportedly used a FN Herstal 5-7 Tactical which can hold up to
31 rounds (extended clip/20 round standard) of 5.7 mm NATO high impact
flat trajectory rounds. It's extremely accurate weapon up to 150
yards - almost as flat and accurate as a high powered rifle. It's
unknown at this point if he did a reload, but if you're planning mass
murder, it wouldn't be surprizing to have an extra clip or two. You
can change one of these clips very quickly. Of course, being a close
quarters/urban combat expert, you wouldn't know that.

The second gun was a Smith and Wesson .357 revolver and it's unknown
if any bullets left the barrel.

Also according to news reports he had taken advanced tactical courses
in pistol and was considered an expert marksman. Add the two together
in a enclosed area where no weapons were allowed your "friendly fire"
concept kind of falls apart.

And Sgt. Munley, trained in close quarter active response was there in
less than three minutes - she had taken him down in less than four.

Just looked at an insider's report- he stopped to reload at least
once, possibly twice. Assuming 31 round clips, that's 93 rounds - not
quite friendly fire is it moron.

Then again, being a close quarters combat expert, you wouldn't know
any of that.

I'd certainly trust the opinion of a television spokesperson over you.

No matter their expertise. Sean Hannity would win out over you.

Still accumulating specs on lawnmowers?

Ah, yes...I forgot...Tom claimed for some time that my model of lawn
mower didn't exist. But, of course, it did...and does. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry, I and many others here have claimed that your 36 foot Zimmerman
like lobster boat doesn't exist. You proved your lawnmower does, now
how about proof of the lobster boat ownership?

That, at least, would be on-topic!

Rob

H the K wrote:
On 11/7/09 2:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:51:55 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

Still accumulating specs on lawnmowers?


Ah, yes...I forgot...Tom claimed for some time that my model of lawn
mower didn't exist. But, of course, it did...and does. :)

Wow! That's got a lot to do with boats.

Rob

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote

Then again, being a close quarters combat expert, you wouldn't know
any of that.

But how can that be? The man knows EVERYTHING THERE IS TO KNOW.

Steve ;-)

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:37:48 -0700, "SteveB"
wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote

Then again, being a close quarters combat expert, you wouldn't know
any of that.

But how can that be? The man knows EVERYTHING THERE IS TO KNOW.

Steve ;-)

I've opted for knowing everything rather than being a complete dildo.

Makes just as much sense as Steve ;-)'s brilliant statement.

On Nov 8, 12:13*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:37:48 -0700, "SteveB"
wrote:



"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote

Then again, being a close quarters combat expert, you wouldn't know
any of that.

But how can that be? *The man knows EVERYTHING THERE IS TO KNOW.

Steve ;-)

I've opted for knowing everything rather than being a complete dildo.

Makes just as much sense as Steve ;-)'s brilliant statement.

True, you are not a complete dildo yet, but keep practicing.

Practice makes perfect.

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:48:07 -0800, jps wrote:

In other news, wingnut swiftboat liar Jerome Corsi attempted to link
the killer to President Obama in Worldnet Daily. This fruitcake
yellow journalism makes its way through right wing outlets to the
brains of Herring, The Freak, Bad Jim and probably Lu Powell.

Get your fact straight.

No where in the Corsi's article does it state anything of the kind.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=115230

In the Huffington Post, that bastian of veritas and honesty did.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_348461.html

No where in Corsi's article does it say he adviced Obama. He was a
group/think tank participant.

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:01:30 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:48:07 -0800, jps wrote:

In other news, wingnut swiftboat liar Jerome Corsi attempted to link
the killer to President Obama in Worldnet Daily. This fruitcake
yellow journalism makes its way through right wing outlets to the
brains of Herring, The Freak, Bad Jim and probably Lu Powell.

Get your fact straight.

No where in the Corsi's article does it state anything of the kind.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=115230

In the Huffington Post, that bastian of veritas and honesty did.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_348461.html

No where in Corsi's article does it say he adviced Obama. He was a
group/think tank participant.

That's not the original story. Here's a link that's at the bottom of
your cited story citing a previous story. Mysteriously, that story
has been replaced with one that makes no mention of the storyline's
heading...

Shooter advised Obama transition
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115137

He was an audience member, and although you (like Corsi) position it
as group/think, there were hundreds there -- and Corsi said that he
advised Obama's transition team. Translation: He advised Obama.

I know connections are difficult for you but thought this one might
not be so hard. Sorry I assumed too much.

They didn't correct the record until Huffington Post called them out,
then the original story disappeared.

WND is not a real news outlet, just like Fox. As someone referred to
Glenn Beck recently, they're carnival barkers.