Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message news:hda8e9 McKee apparently is a fan of the free market competitive system that isn't operative in the health care insurance industry. Well, that's what I don't get... it seems to me that especially among Republicans they would want a competitive system, even if there's only a possibility of it, even if it meant that the insurance companies couldn't compete and went belly up. That's the free market capitalistic system defined. Eat or be eaten. Survival of the fittest. So, there must be some other reason for the opposition, and I'd like one of these people to be honest and say what it is. -- Nom=de=Plume We do not have major competion now, because of government regulation. How do you think more governmental regulation will increase competition. It certainly would not. You're not getting it. We need to have affordable healthcare coverage for average people. There are two ways to do that. 1) increase competition via a public option. 2) increase regulation so that insurance companies can't deny people coverage for things like pre-existing conditions. -- Nom=de=Plume Pre-existing is actually 2 items. Those with no insurance and a pre-existing condition and those with insurance and changing insurance. Put a large penalty on those with no insurance and a pre-existing condition. Sort of like buying fire insurance after your house burned down. If you are Even if they were denied insurance to begin with?? going to require the insurance company cover it, then you better make it possible to recover the excess payouts. If you have a insurance, make the new insurance company deal with your former as to payments. We could get a lot more competition in insurance prices with opening up the market, across state lines, etc. Why should a company with enough reserves to be an insurance company be banned from selling in a state? The crossing state lines is a canard. What it really means is that insurance companies can move to states that don't have as many regulations, and thus they can deny even more claims. The other question is the healthcare bill affordable healthcare, or affordable insurance? This "healthcare" bill does nothing for lowering healthcare costs. The public option will force them to cut their overhead. This affects both the ins. company and the medical professional. It absolutely will lower costs all across the spectrum. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Harry Reid finds his balls | General | |||
Nevada's oldest newspaper takes on Harry Reid | General | |||
Now Pelosi and Obama disagree... | General | |||
Harry Reid, Bush, Congress | General | |||
Rough Seas, concluded - Uss Reid.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos |