| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
~~ snerk ~~
|
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ... ~~ snerk ~~ Snerk... How do the two governors affect national policy? In other words, who cares? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:22:28 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. Well said. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
"RLM" wrote in message
... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. All politics is local. That's the trend. 60% of the voters in Virginia and NJ said Obama didn't influence their vote. 20% said he did in a positive way; 20% said he did in a negative way. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Oh, for God's sake! This has turned to complete idiotic lunacy..... |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 1:02 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. All politics is local. That's the trend. 60% of the voters in Virginia and NJ said Obama didn't influence their vote. 20% said he did in a positive way; 20% said he did in a negative way. That's especially true in Virginia. The Dems in that state have two really large, strong pockets of strength, and a third, smaller area. The big areas are northern Virginia and the Richmond area. So, who do they pick in their primary? A guy almost no one has heard of, from the backwater part of the state where the rednecks live. From that moment on, the election results were a known conclusion. Creigh Deeds might have been an ideal candidate for the 1970s, but not for 2008. The House pickup in upstate New York was a kick to Sarah Palin's gonads...:) A delightful surprise, as it were. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:49:21 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/4/09 1:02 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. All politics is local. That's the trend. 60% of the voters in Virginia and NJ said Obama didn't influence their vote. 20% said he did in a positive way; 20% said he did in a negative way. That's especially true in Virginia. The Dems in that state have two really large, strong pockets of strength, and a third, smaller area. The big areas are northern Virginia and the Richmond area. So, who do they pick in their primary? A guy almost no one has heard of, from the backwater part of the state where the rednecks live. From that moment on, the election results were a known conclusion. Creigh Deeds might have been an ideal candidate for the 1970s, but not for 2008. The House pickup in upstate New York was a kick to Sarah Palin's gonads...:) A delightful surprise, as it were. It's a testament to their stupidity. Circular firing squad. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote:
On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Small spoiled dogs have become our noise substitute for the kids. Still get up in the middle of the night to let them out but at least there are no diapers. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
|
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Yeah right, it's only because they ask questions, face it... Last week Obama said one day that the 3.1 uptick in the economy was solely because of the stimulous package. The day before, Gibbs had said that half, or 1.6 % was caused by the cash for clunkers. A Fox reporter asked Gibbs to square this, I guess that's the kind of news you are against... Fine.. -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:41:09 -0800, jps wrote:
snipped to the objection of redundancy We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. Why am I not suprised that you would find Faux News unworthy of a good slagging? George Wallace and Strom Thurmond both outgrew their odd dependency. ?? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:48:23 -0500, Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. Feral half-bobcat? Sounds like a serious case of 'confabulation.' -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
|
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. No, because like all of his posts, that was a lie. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:46:42 -0500, Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Yeah right, it's only because they ask questions, face it... There are two adults in this household and fox isn't part of my wasting time. I have other things to do to waste time. Last week Obama said one day that the 3.1 uptick in the economy was solely because of the stimulous package. The day before, Gibbs had said that half, or 1.6 % was caused by the cash for clunkers. A Fox reporter asked Gibbs to square this, I guess that's the kind of news you are against... Fine.. "Gibbs" to us is a character on NCIS, a TV show. Any other reference is of no consideration in this house. I read the news on the net I don't have time for every ones opinion. My opinion is the only one I take into consideration. My wife has her opinion. We tend to agree on most subjects. We don't beat our head against a rock to prove our point. Life is too short. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 2:21 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Small spoiled dogs have become our noise substitute for the kids. Still get up in the middle of the night to let them out but at least there are no diapers. Dogs are great. Don't have any, but I have had dogs as pets. Our cats are cool because they don't go outside. Ever. Unless they are headed out to their annual vet visit. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter than Republicans. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 2:48 PM, Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. No, ****-for-brains...Cal is a maine coon cat. You seem to have problems telling one pussy from another. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter than Republicans. You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably sycophantic. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter than Republicans. You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably sycophantic. -- That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:38:43 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:46:42 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Yeah right, it's only because they ask questions, face it... There are two adults in this household and fox isn't part of my wasting time. I have other things to do to waste time. Last week Obama said one day that the 3.1 uptick in the economy was solely because of the stimulous package. The day before, Gibbs had said that half, or 1.6 % was caused by the cash for clunkers. A Fox reporter asked Gibbs to square this, I guess that's the kind of news you are against... Fine.. "Gibbs" to us is a character on NCIS, a TV show. Any other reference is of no consideration in this house. I read the news on the net I don't have time for every ones opinion. My opinion is the only one I take into consideration. My wife has her opinion. We tend to agree on most subjects. We don't beat our head against a rock to prove our point. Life is too short. Rock is an excellent description of Tosk, The Freak. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:48:23 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. Feral half-bobcat? Sounds like a serious case of 'confabulation.' Well, I don't have my dictionary handy, and of course I am secure enough to note that I don't know what "confabulation' means, but if it means anything like fabrication, you are right on the money;) After all, it was our local pedophile, pension theif, fat ass liar who claimed it... -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... Tosk wrote: In article , says... Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Oh, for God's sake! This has turned to complete idiotic lunacy..... You think it's lunacy to wish the president would listen to the taxpayers? Why? He should listen to ALL taxpayers? A few states don't mean ****. Yes, he should listen to all taxpayers, that would include republicans, moderated, and independents, not just the extreme far left who seem to be the only ones on his guest list lately... -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:46:42 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Yeah right, it's only because they ask questions, face it... There are two adults in this household and fox isn't part of my wasting time. I have other things to do to waste time. Last week Obama said one day that the 3.1 uptick in the economy was solely because of the stimulous package. The day before, Gibbs had said that half, or 1.6 % was caused by the cash for clunkers. A Fox reporter asked Gibbs to square this, I guess that's the kind of news you are against... Fine.. "Gibbs" to us is a character on NCIS, a TV show. Any other reference is of no consideration in this house. I read the news on the net I don't have time for every ones opinion. My opinion is the only one I take into consideration. My wife has her opinion. We tend to agree on most subjects. We don't beat our head against a rock to prove our point. Life is too short. Oh, did I spell his name wrong.. Well then, that makes everything ok I guess. 10% unemployment, not closing Gitmo, not ending the war, not putting up a health care bill that is neutral, no open doors in Washington, no change, is all my fault. Damn spell-checker.... -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
"H the K" wrote in message ... On 11/4/09 2:48 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. No, ****-for-brains...Cal is a maine coon cat. You seem to have problems telling one pussy from another. ~~ Snerk ~~ That Freak kills me.. LOL |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Nov 4, 7:08*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"H the K" wrote in ... On 11/4/09 2:48 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, * wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. *The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? * Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. No, ****-for-brains...Cal is a maine coon cat. You seem to have problems telling one pussy from another. ~~ Snerk ~~ *That Freak kills me.. LOL It would be a pleasure, come on out from under your desk... |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
Don White wrote:
"H the wrote in message ... On 11/4/09 2:48 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. No, ****-for-brains...Cal is a maine coon cat. You seem to have problems telling one pussy from another. ~~ Snerk ~~ That Freak kills me.. LOL Do you ever have an original thought? -S |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Nov 4, 6:21*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ john corzine, a goldman sachs banker, is a leftie? who knew? |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:32:33 -0500, Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:48:23 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. Feral half-bobcat? Sounds like a serious case of 'confabulation.' Well, I don't have my dictionary handy, and of course I am secure enough to note that I don't know what "confabulation' means, but if it means anything like fabrication, you are right on the money;) After all, it was our local pedophile, pension theif, fat ass liar who claimed it... You're close. It has a psychological connotation that describes the act of filling the gaps in one's memories with false memories. Perhaps it's one of the symptoms of clinical narcissism. I think, though, that there may be more than one mental 'aberration' at play. Any person who receives the word of a feline has 'issues.' -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:26 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter than Republicans. You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably sycophantic. -- That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons. You surprise me again, Harry. It is the rare, informed 'progressive' that will admit to an ascendant aspect to evolution. Very rare indeed. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 8:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:32:33 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:48:23 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. Feral half-bobcat? Sounds like a serious case of 'confabulation.' Well, I don't have my dictionary handy, and of course I am secure enough to note that I don't know what "confabulation' means, but if it means anything like fabrication, you are right on the money;) After all, it was our local pedophile, pension theif, fat ass liar who claimed it... You're close. It has a psychological connotation that describes the act of filling the gaps in one's memories with false memories. Perhaps it's one of the symptoms of clinical narcissism. I think, though, that there may be more than one mental 'aberration' at play. Any person who receives the word of a feline has 'issues.' Your boy Tosk is confabulating again. I've never claimed a "feral half-bobcat" as a pet, nor am I "always" talking about it. Of course, I'm also not a pension "theif," or a pedophile. But it makes the ignorant little **** feel better about himself to say so. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com