|
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:49:21 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/4/09 1:02 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. All politics is local. That's the trend. 60% of the voters in Virginia and NJ said Obama didn't influence their vote. 20% said he did in a positive way; 20% said he did in a negative way. That's especially true in Virginia. The Dems in that state have two really large, strong pockets of strength, and a third, smaller area. The big areas are northern Virginia and the Richmond area. So, who do they pick in their primary? A guy almost no one has heard of, from the backwater part of the state where the rednecks live. From that moment on, the election results were a known conclusion. Creigh Deeds might have been an ideal candidate for the 1970s, but not for 2008. The House pickup in upstate New York was a kick to Sarah Palin's gonads...:) A delightful surprise, as it were. It's a testament to their stupidity. Circular firing squad. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote:
On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Small spoiled dogs have become our noise substitute for the kids. Still get up in the middle of the night to let them out but at least there are no diapers. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
|
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Yeah right, it's only because they ask questions, face it... Last week Obama said one day that the 3.1 uptick in the economy was solely because of the stimulous package. The day before, Gibbs had said that half, or 1.6 % was caused by the cash for clunkers. A Fox reporter asked Gibbs to square this, I guess that's the kind of news you are against... Fine.. -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
In article ,
says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: ~~ snerk ~~ The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff. I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign". What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the message", wouldn't you think? Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a trend yet. There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand. We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always talking about.. pffftttt. -- Wafa free again. |
Left wing loses NJ and VA.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:41:09 -0800, jps wrote:
snipped to the objection of redundancy We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty second talking heads occupy their time for hours. That according to grand kids with great grandkids. That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world. Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News. http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both outgrew their odd dependency. Why am I not suprised that you would find Faux News unworthy of a good slagging? George Wallace and Strom Thurmond both outgrew their odd dependency. ?? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com