"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:22:49 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

unfrigginbelievable.


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/wo...wt&twt=nytimes

The amazing thing is how far East and South of their base they were
operating.

The only answer - small tatical nuke right on top of the headquarters
should do it.

No nukes. To much bad mojo. Either Thermobaric bomb (Fuel Air Explosive)
or a BLU-82B Daisy Cutter.

In article ,
says...

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:22:49 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

unfrigginbelievable.


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/wo...wt&twt=nytimes

The amazing thing is how far East and South of their base they were
operating.

The only answer - small tatical nuke right on top of the headquarters
should do it.

No nukes. To much bad mojo. Either Thermobaric bomb (Fuel Air Explosive)
or a BLU-82B Daisy Cutter.

Well, I have always felt that it should read. Two eyes for an eye, and a
mouth full of teeth for a tooth, and the son of a bitch won't come back
to see what you have for him next time...

I know Tim.... I will say it for you... Awwwwwwwwwww Scott...

If they kill these two tourists, take out two hometowns of the pirates
and let the rest of the country decide if this is all really worth it...

On Oct 28, 12:29*pm, Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...







"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:g27ge51id9576oitkmdqcv91v2uhc3e646@4ax .com...
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:22:49 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

unfrigginbelievable.

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:lm7fe5hs81na1ja1rfbc3fm2upm5bhrb4j@4 ax.com...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/wo...s.html?src=twt...

The amazing thing is how far East and South of their base they were
operating.

The only answer - small tatical nuke right on top of the headquarters
should do it.

No nukes. *To much bad mojo. *Either *Thermobaric bomb (Fuel Air Explosive)
or a BLU-82B Daisy Cutter.

Well, I have always felt that it should read. Two eyes for an eye, and a
mouth full of teeth for a tooth, and the son of a bitch won't come back
to see what you have for him next time... * *

I know Tim.... I will say it for you... Awwwwwwwwwww Scott...

LOL!

I don't have to guy. You already did!
Nothing like self-automated quotes, though.

?;^ )

On Oct 28, 3:28*pm, Tim wrote:
On Oct 28, 12:29*pm, Tosk wrote:



In article ,
says...

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:g27ge51id9576oitkmdqcv91v2uhc3e646@4ax .com...
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:22:49 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

unfrigginbelievable.

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:lm7fe5hs81na1ja1rfbc3fm2upm5bhrb4j@4 ax.com...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/wo...s.html?src=twt...

The amazing thing is how far East and South of their base they were
operating.

The only answer - small tatical nuke right on top of the headquarters
should do it.

No nukes. *To much bad mojo. *Either *Thermobaric bomb (Fuel Air Explosive)
or a BLU-82B Daisy Cutter.

Well, I have always felt that it should read. Two eyes for an eye, and a
mouth full of teeth for a tooth, and the son of a bitch won't come back
to see what you have for him next time... * *

I know Tim.... I will say it for you... Awwwwwwwwwww Scott...

LOL!

I don't have to guy. You already did!
Nothing like self-automated quotes, though.

?;^ )- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

OOPS! My reading was slower than my typing. You DID say it for me.


Sorry.


Carry on.

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:35:13 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:22:49 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

unfrigginbelievable.


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/wo...wt&twt=nytimes

The amazing thing is how far East and South of their base they were
operating.

The only answer - small tatical nuke right on top of the headquarters
should do it.

No nukes. To much bad mojo. Either Thermobaric bomb (Fuel Air Explosive)
or a BLU-82B Daisy Cutter.

What the hell is the difference?

Ever seen one of those thermobaric monsters go off?

Use a tactical nuke - faster, cleaner and minimal residue. :)

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:35:13 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:22:49 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

unfrigginbelievable.


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/wo...wt&twt=nytimes

The amazing thing is how far East and South of their base they were
operating.

The only answer - small tatical nuke right on top of the headquarters
should do it.

No nukes. To much bad mojo. Either Thermobaric bomb (Fuel Air
Explosive)
or a BLU-82B Daisy Cutter.

What the hell is the difference?

Ever seen one of those thermobaric monsters go off?

Use a tactical nuke - faster, cleaner and minimal residue. :)

Nukes have a PR problem. Never saw a FAE except in movies. Friend was a
backseater in Phantoms. They were escorting a C130 in to Cambodia one time
he said. No lights and almost collided with the C130, after the plane
dropped the package. He said as the bomb slid out the plane went really
nose up with the weight shift. And then he thought the bomb was a dud as
nothing happened. For maybe 2 minutes. While all the FAE went into
tunnels, etc. Then he said it was like a nuke. Less PR, but more carbon
unfriendly.