8 more...
 

"TJ" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:45:09 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 28, 2:20 pm, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:42:51 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Frankly, I honestly don't care either. However, again to be fair
and
balanced, the media and the Left made a big deal about President
Bush's
golf outings during times of economic stress and two wars. So why
aren't
they making the same comparision for President Obama who has, as of
today, made more golf outings in the first nine months of his
Administration than Bush did in three years of his administration
under
the same conditions?
Do you really think it's fair to compare Obama with some idiot who
gave
up golf "in solidarity" with dying soldiers?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...08/05/13/AR200...
It's totally fair. That guy was an idiot (or so I'm told).
OR SO YOU'RE TOLD. I knew you were a sock puppet. Thanks for admitting
it.
That's unfair to sock puppets everywhere. This one is devoid of any
content.

I've been gone for two days. Came back to 700+ posts. Came to the
first nomdeplum and hit the apply filters button. Immediately - 269
posts removed.

You guys must have been pushing her buttons continuously. Is she the
latest laughingstock? Hell, she had more posts than Harry, Donnie and
slammer put together!

She wants to be the center of attention. Gentlemen as we are, we
accommodate her.


If you see something bright in a darkened room, it's pretty hard not to
look.

--
Nom=de=Plume

8 more...
 

On Oct 31, 12:51*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:55:56 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Oct 28, 10:14*pm, Tosk wrote:
In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9
@o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 28, 11:49*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 28, 10:23*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:03*am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"

wrote:
On Oct 28, 8:59*am, Loogypicker wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:04*pm, Tosk wrote:

American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New
Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the
crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs....

Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative,
you're beginning to sound foolish.

Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just
want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous
and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama
saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the
campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more
important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date.

I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that
happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone.

No double standard there. *That's exactly what the liberals were
saying as soon as Bush took office.

And yes, he
IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding
how best to move forward.

Wow... a whole 25 minutes? *It took him longer than that to clean his
clubs after the last golf outing.

Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. *Stop making
excuses for him. *Obama is failing miserably at the job.

They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At
three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours.

Casady

According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can
no longer do anything about it. *These new ones are dieing on BO's
watch. *While he plays golf and... does nothing.

What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when
it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the
Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all
on Bush, it's that old double standard again...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But according to John, if it happened on Bush's watch, it's all him!

OK. I now realize you just aren't capable of understanding what I've
been saying. So please, in the future just disregard my posts.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

John, you have said so here many times that Bush can't be blamed for
the economy because Obama's on watch now. So, if Obama has to take the
heat for everything, even when the economy really went in the tank
when Bush was president, wouldn't it then be that everything that
happened when Bush was president was HIS fault? Or is there a double
standard?

8 more...
 

"TJ" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
Stevie wrote:
Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:51:25 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...

American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New
Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all
the
crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs....

Unlike McCain, he can do more than one thing at a time.
The little dweeb didn't find it disgusting when we were sending our
troops into harms way on trumped up intelligence.

He didn't find it obscene when we poured money into Iraq by the pallet
to soothe families of dead civilian relatives.

He didn't find it a travesty when we let contractors off the hook for
screwing people or killing civilians or our own troops with shoody
work.

The Freak is a purely partisan punk with the mental capacity of a
small rodent. You've seen 'em in the circus. They ride miniature
motocross bikes.

Hey... finally a job The Freak might be able to handle.


You aren't very original, are you?

Hey Loogie. Give us a heads up when you do a substantial name change.

So...is Kevin hiding behind the Steve name?
I'm guessing Dingy Dan is the new TJ. What happened to you girls..did your
provider slap your wrists?

8 more...
 

"TJ" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:


A week ago The Freak was apologizing to Slammer. Now he's throwing nasty
digs again.
What a little twerp.


If anyone would know about nasty little digs, it would be you. You're just
a harry puppet dressed in flannel. Brrrr Shivvver. Just thinking of you
trying to survive up in that frozen wasteland gives me the chills.



It's no country for girliemen.

8 more...
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"TJ" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:45:09 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 28, 2:20 pm, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:42:51 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Frankly, I honestly don't care either. However, again to be fair
and
balanced, the media and the Left made a big deal about President
Bush's
golf outings during times of economic stress and two wars. So why
aren't
they making the same comparision for President Obama who has, as of
today, made more golf outings in the first nine months of his
Administration than Bush did in three years of his administration
under
the same conditions?
Do you really think it's fair to compare Obama with some idiot who
gave
up golf "in solidarity" with dying soldiers?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...08/05/13/AR200...
It's totally fair. That guy was an idiot (or so I'm told).
OR SO YOU'RE TOLD. I knew you were a sock puppet. Thanks for admitting
it.
That's unfair to sock puppets everywhere. This one is devoid of any
content.

I've been gone for two days. Came back to 700+ posts. Came to the
first nomdeplum and hit the apply filters button. Immediately - 269
posts removed.

You guys must have been pushing her buttons continuously. Is she the
latest laughingstock? Hell, she had more posts than Harry, Donnie and
slammer put together!

She wants to be the center of attention. Gentlemen as we are, we
accommodate her.


If you see something bright in a darkened room, it's pretty hard not to
look.

--
Nom=de=Plume

~~ Snerk ~~

8 more...
 

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:29:53 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Oct 31, 12:51*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:55:56 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Oct 28, 10:14*pm, Tosk wrote:
In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9
@o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 28, 11:49*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 28, 10:23*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:03*am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"

wrote:
On Oct 28, 8:59*am, Loogypicker wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:04*pm, Tosk wrote:

American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New
Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the
crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs....

Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative,
you're beginning to sound foolish.

Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just
want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous
and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama
saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the
campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more
important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date.

I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that
happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone.

No double standard there. *That's exactly what the liberals were
saying as soon as Bush took office.

And yes, he
IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding
how best to move forward.

Wow... a whole 25 minutes? *It took him longer than that to clean his
clubs after the last golf outing.

Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. *Stop making
excuses for him. *Obama is failing miserably at the job.

They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At
three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours.

Casady

According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can
no longer do anything about it. *These new ones are dieing on BO's
watch. *While he plays golf and... does nothing.

What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when
it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the
Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all
on Bush, it's that old double standard again...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But according to John, if it happened on Bush's watch, it's all him!

OK. I now realize you just aren't capable of understanding what I've
been saying. So please, in the future just disregard my posts.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

John, you have said so here many times that Bush can't be blamed for
the economy because Obama's on watch now. So, if Obama has to take the
heat for everything, even when the economy really went in the tank
when Bush was president, wouldn't it then be that everything that
happened when Bush was president was HIS fault? Or is there a double
standard?

Cite? I didn't think so.

8 more...
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:55:56 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Oct 28, 10:14*pm, Tosk wrote:
In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9
@o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...







On Oct 28, 11:49*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 28, 10:23*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:03*am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"

wrote:
On Oct 28, 8:59*am, Loogypicker wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:04*pm, Tosk wrote:

American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New
Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the
crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs....

Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative,
you're beginning to sound foolish.

Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just
want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous
and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama
saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the
campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more
important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date.

I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that
happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone.

No double standard there. *That's exactly what the liberals were
saying as soon as Bush took office.

And yes, he
IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding
how best to move forward.

Wow... a whole 25 minutes? *It took him longer than that to clean his
clubs after the last golf outing.

Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. *Stop making
excuses for him. *Obama is failing miserably at the job.

They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At
three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours.

Casady

According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can
no longer do anything about it. *These new ones are dieing on BO's
watch. *While he plays golf and... does nothing.

What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when
it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the
Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all
on Bush, it's that old double standard again...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But according to John, if it happened on Bush's watch, it's all him!

OK. I now realize you just aren't capable of understanding what I've
been saying. So please, in the future just disregard my posts.

These guys are just dodging.. I am out...

8 more...
 

In article , ""tj
\"@florida,com" says...

Don White wrote:


A week ago The Freak was apologizing to Slammer. Now he's throwing nasty
digs again.
What a little twerp.


If anyone would know about nasty little digs, it would be you. You're
just a harry puppet dressed in flannel. Brrrr Shivvver. Just thinking of
you trying to survive up in that frozen wasteland gives me the chills.

Not to mention, Bonnie is lying again, but what else is new.. Bonnie is
a proven liar, remember he said he had seen Harry's lobsta' boat, then
it was pictures, who knows what the story is now...

8 more...
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Oct 29, 9:07*am, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...







"BAR" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. *Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?

You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???

A decision is better than no decision.

Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than
one that isn't.

How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well-
thought through decision?

Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in
action with Obama.

We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not
focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had
some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those
issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If
only....

Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently
trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat
party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right
wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing.

How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in
the best political light.

So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a
political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right?

With Obama it will always be political.

Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his
heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA
thrive.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hoooo BOY!!! Right out of Rush's playbook.....

You need to spend less time listening to Rush. Pay attention to the
news and the crap 'Bama is doing to our country.

That's right, if you ask a question, you must listen to Rush. That is
getting old, why are they so afraid to answer simple questions? Because
the truth is, America wouldn't like the answers...

8 more...
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:59:44 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Oct 28, 11:57*am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:23:02 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:03*am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Oct 28, 8:59*am, Loogypicker wrote:

On Oct 27, 7:04*pm, Tosk wrote:

American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New
Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the
crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs....

Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative,
you're beginning to sound foolish.

Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just
want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous
and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama
saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the
campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more
important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date.

I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that
happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone. And yes, he
IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding
how best to move forward.

You've read my 'claim' several times. Now you lie about it. That's not
what I've said. Apparently you still don't understand, or you do
understand but can't face it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

John, you know good and well that you've stated here several times
that it's all in Obama's hands now, we can't blame anything on Bush.

Cite? I didn't think so.

It's really really ignorant of someone to bury their head in the sand
so far that they can't say anything good about a liberal or anything
bad about a conservative.

And just as ignorant to ignore it when we do... Which we have several
times...