About Us

Jim

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...
Funny how these things work out. :)

Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.

It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats?

In a perfect world, where we could banish the likes of you and the other
agitators, maybe boats could be discussed in a civil manner.

You are Krauses little lapdog. He says something rude and you start
yapping away in agreement like a good little puppy.

In a perfect world, Krause would be put away and you would be put up for
adoption.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hey Timmy! Do you realize?	John Kuthe	General	3	October 22nd 09 09:18 PM
TIMMY comes to the FAGGOTS rescue.....	Scott Dickson	General	12	October 22nd 09 02:38 PM
TIMMY O'NEILL-OUTSIDE UNIVERSITY	Steven D Schwortz	Whitewater	2	April 6th 04 03:30 PM
Timmy	Wandering Hiker	General	0	February 29th 04 03:50 PM
Poor Timmy	John Q Adams	General	1	August 17th 03 12:21 AM

Menu

About Us