Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote:

How about, no trashing, perid?

John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to
you.

Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:25:15 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...

Funny how these things work out. :)



Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.


It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..


How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.

So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?


How about, NO TRASHING, period.

That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to
be an 'Exaulted Ruler' to stop ANY trashing.

Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote:

How about, no trashing, perid?

John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to
you.

Oh, that sounds like you're trying to break up with a girl you don't
like anymore.

Just admit it Tim. You don't love him anymore.

Can you imagine what it's like to be married to him? Thank god you're
not into gay marriage cause it's gonna be legal everywhere, soon.

Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote:

How about, no trashing, perid?

John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to
you.

Hey, did you get my email response.

(You know, the secret stuff....)

Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.

You have to remember that whipping up emotions is what some people
live for. You know who I'm talking about, we all do. Put them in
the kill file, along with who ever quotes them, and the whole tone of
the group changes.

Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Oct 22, 4:04*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote:

How about, no trashing, perid?

John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to
you.

Hey, did you get my email response.

(You know, the secret stuff....)

I haven't checked yet, but I'll do it now. My Cracker Jack Super Duper
Decoder Ring doesn't go back that far. i wish I had one of those old
WW2 German machines They used on their U-Boats (boating content
provided) to crack the code, though.

Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Oct 22, 4:04*pm, John H. wrote:


Hey, did you get my email response.

(You know, the secret stuff....)

Recieved and Responded.

Thank you!

Timmy to the rescue.
 

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote:

On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson

wrote:
Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next.
There won't be a next - that's enough.

There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and
your
Federal authorities.

Just drop it.
Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your
threats
don't phase me, Tom.
It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that
was
a one-off. And the person deserved it.

Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I
don't
give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense
he
purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have
to
deal with it.

What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in
good
people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally
and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not -
I'm
pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it
takes
is a little header information, a few minutes with some software
and
your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had
thier access pulled for similar speech - take note.

I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my
fight.

Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an
"apology"
- you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it.

So just drop it.
I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of
the
bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group...
Funny how these things work out. :)

Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash.

It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones
and
innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions.
If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of
non-combatants
would be my 1st ruling..

How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you
to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know.
So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members?
John is suggesting that all trashing stop. I should think that would make
you happy.

It would...if he means what he says....therefore I'm watching him.
We shall see, time will tell, the proof of the pudding is in the eating of
it.
Get the message?


How much time has to pass before you will generously concede to stop
your trash talk? Who knows. I might even join in on the pledge after a
period of time when I'm certain you have stopped trashing.

What message?

Timmy to the rescue.
 

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:13:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 22, 4:04*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote:

How about, no trashing, perid?

John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to
you.

Hey, did you get my email response.

(You know, the secret stuff....)

I haven't checked yet, but I'll do it now. My Cracker Jack Super Duper
Decoder Ring doesn't go back that far. i wish I had one of those old
WW2 German machines They used on their U-Boats (boating content
provided) to crack the code, though.

I think that was called the Wehrmacht Enigma machine, Tim. The
British eventually captured one. It was too big for a Cracker Jacks
box, though. :)

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Timmy to the rescue.
 

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:13:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 22, 4:04 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 22, 1:54 pm, John H. wrote:

How about, no trashing, perid?

John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to
you.

Hey, did you get my email response.

(You know, the secret stuff....)

I haven't checked yet, but I'll do it now. My Cracker Jack Super Duper
Decoder Ring doesn't go back that far. i wish I had one of those old
WW2 German machines They used on their U-Boats (boating content
provided) to crack the code, though.

I think that was called the Wehrmacht Enigma machine, Tim. The
British eventually captured one. It was too big for a Cracker Jacks
box, though. :)

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
"I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a
mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian
national interest."


--
Nom=de=Plume