"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:54:55 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/12/09 9:24 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 9:05 am, John wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:48:24 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/wa...009/10/12/stal...
Great line:

"It’s beyond belief to me,’’ said Robert Haynes, president of the
Massachusetts AFL-CIO. While Obama and Congress inherited “a big
mess’’ from Bush, Haynes said, "there aren’t any excuses anymore. If
you can’t deliver health care, and you can’t deliver jobs, and if you
can’t deliver [card check legislation], and you can’t figure out how
to take care of the working people of this great city and country, you
don’t deserve to stay in office.’’

Do you reckon 'Bama hasn't done all this because he's concentrating on
appeasing the gay crowd?
and what has he done for the 'gay crowd'?


He gave them a speech the other night and made *lots* of promises.
Apparently a whole bunch of them want to join the military.

I can't say I disagree with keeping gays out of the armed forces. In the
locker room I don't think I would appreciate anotehr man saying, "oh my,
you have a sexy ass...".

What about hetrosexual rights? The rights not to be oggled by a perverted
type?

Would most likely not be a problem after a year or 2. There are closet gays
in there now. And England, etc. allows gays. Sounds sort of like 1948 and
Truman intergrated the service. Worked fine.