On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:57:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:54:55 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/12/09 9:24 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 9:05 am, John wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:48:24 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/wa...009/10/12/stal...
Great line:

"It’s beyond belief to me,’’ said Robert Haynes, president of the
Massachusetts AFL-CIO. While Obama and Congress inherited “a big
mess’’ from Bush, Haynes said, "there aren’t any excuses anymore. If
you can’t deliver health care, and you can’t deliver jobs, and if you
can’t deliver [card check legislation], and you can’t figure out how
to take care of the working people of this great city and country, you
don’t deserve to stay in office.’’

Do you reckon 'Bama hasn't done all this because he's concentrating on
appeasing the gay crowd?
and what has he done for the 'gay crowd'?


He gave them a speech the other night and made *lots* of promises.
Apparently a whole bunch of them want to join the military.

I can't say I disagree with keeping gays out of the armed forces. In
the locker room I don't think I would appreciate anotehr man saying, "oh
my, you have a sexy ass...".

What about hetrosexual rights? The rights not to be oggled by a
perverted type?

I think gay guys in the military should get the same benefits females
did when they came in - separate bedrooms, separate bathrooms,
separate showers, etc. Of course the same should go for lesbians. Or,
better yet, put the gay guys with the hetero females and the gay
females with the hetero guys. Hell, that would work, wouldn't it???