Hoping for failure
 

"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he
didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can
you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually
think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol


Maybe you should trademark the name...

--
Nom=de=Plume

Hoping for failure
 

Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he
didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words.
Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually
think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Hoping for failure
 

Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he
didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words.
Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually
think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable.
:-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Not from what I've read.

Hoping for failure
 

On 10/12/09 3:23 PM, Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers,
the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say
he didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his
words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who
actually think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty
reasonable. :-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Not from what I've read.



I can think of a lot of ways to describe flajim, but "smart" would not
be one of them.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Hoping for failure
 

Jim wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote:
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't
deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

the GOP thinks only of power

not america

not working people

just power

So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things:

- how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend?
- how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption.
- how to control people so they don't rebell.
- take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty.

You are NOT arguing the point, what the "Dems" do has nothing to do with
anything. That tactic is called a "Red Herring."

Argue the point if you can.

I knew he couldn't.

Hoping for failure
 

Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers,
the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say
he didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his
words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who
actually think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty
reasonable. :-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Not from what I've read.
Cmon now. Be reasonable.

Hoping for failure
 

"Jim" wrote in message
m...
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he
didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words.
Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually
think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable.
:-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Not from what I've read.


Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Hoping for failure
 

On 10/12/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
m...
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he
didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words.
Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually
think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable.
:-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Not from what I've read.


Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year.



Jerko=Smart is a George W. Bush sort of thing.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Hoping for failure
 

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:21:49 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/12/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
m...
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he
didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words.
Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually
think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable.
:-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Not from what I've read.


Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year.



Jerko=Smart is a George W. Bush sort of thing.

You stole my line...

I was going to say that Jerko=Smart went out of fashion on January
20th of this year.

Hoping for failure
 

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:54:39 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
om...
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
m...
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he
didn't deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words.
Can you imagine if a Democrat said that?

You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually
think will revolt.


I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable.
:-)

I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step.


I'm the reasonable Jim. lol
I'm the smart one. ;-)

Not from what I've read.


Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year.


On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:24:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I absolutely reject that line of reasoning or implication. I don't engage in
such behavior. Feel free to show otherwise. I can't speak for others.