|
Hoping for failure
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. |
Hoping for failure
On Oct 11, 1:56*pm, Jim wrote:
The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. *Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power |
Hoping for failure
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. - how to control people so they don't rebell. - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty. |
Hoping for failure
On Oct 11, 3:19 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? to get us out of the economic collapse caused by the GOP - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. the GOP cuts taxes for the rich while raising them on the middle class to support their social darwinist/calvinist view of america - how to control people so they don't rebell. the GOP regulates sex, personal privacy, and other aspects of individualism - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty.- the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' |
Hoping for failure
"Jim" wrote in message
m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hoping for failure
Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. - how to control people so they don't rebell. - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty. You are NOT arguing the point, what the "Dems" do has nothing to do with anything. That tactic is called a "Red Herring." Argue the point if you can. |
Hoping for failure
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. |
Hoping for failure
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 11, 3:19 pm, Canuck57 wrote: wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? to get us out of the economic collapse caused by the GOP - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. the GOP cuts taxes for the rich while raising them on the middle class to support their social darwinist/calvinist view of america - how to control people so they don't rebell. the GOP regulates sex, personal privacy, and other aspects of individualism - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty.- the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' We have more than our share but for some reason "Canuck" feels a need to venture south accross the virtual border and add his stupid 2 cents. Canadian cents that is. |
Hoping for failure
"Jim" wrote in message
m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hoping for failure
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol |
Hoping for failure
"Jim" wrote in message
m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol Maybe you should trademark the name... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hoping for failure
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) |
Hoping for failure
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. |
Hoping for failure
On 10/12/09 3:23 PM, Jim wrote:
Jim wrote: Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. I can think of a lot of ways to describe flajim, but "smart" would not be one of them. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Hoping for failure
Jim wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. - how to control people so they don't rebell. - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty. You are NOT arguing the point, what the "Dems" do has nothing to do with anything. That tactic is called a "Red Herring." Argue the point if you can. I knew he couldn't. |
Hoping for failure
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote: Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. Cmon now. Be reasonable. |
Hoping for failure
"Jim" wrote in message
m... Jim wrote: Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hoping for failure
On 10/12/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message m... Jim wrote: Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year. Jerko=Smart is a George W. Bush sort of thing. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Hoping for failure
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:21:49 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/12/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message m... Jim wrote: Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year. Jerko=Smart is a George W. Bush sort of thing. You stole my line... I was going to say that Jerko=Smart went out of fashion on January 20th of this year. |
Hoping for failure
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:54:39 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Jim" wrote in message om... Jim wrote: Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year. On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:24:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I absolutely reject that line of reasoning or implication. I don't engage in such behavior. Feel free to show otherwise. I can't speak for others. |
Hoping for failure
"John H" wrote in message
... On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:54:39 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message news:gaadnQwl74bfH07XnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@earthlink. com... Jim wrote: Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. Rush (the leader, supposedly) agrees with the Taliban... his words. Can you imagine if a Democrat said that? You wonder how far this will go before the Republican's who actually think will revolt. I'm getting my "Jims" confused because this sounds pretty reasonable. :-) I think it might have started. Lindsey Graham took a good first step. I'm the reasonable Jim. lol I'm the smart one. ;-) Not from what I've read. Not from what I've read either... unless jerko=smart this year. On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:24:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I absolutely reject that line of reasoning or implication. I don't engage in such behavior. Feel free to show otherwise. I can't speak for others. I'm stating fact, but you're right, it was mean. Facts can be mean SOBs sometimes. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hoping for failure
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 11, 3:19 pm, Canuck57 wrote: wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? to get us out of the economic collapse caused by the GOP - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. the GOP cuts taxes for the rich while raising them on the middle class to support their social darwinist/calvinist view of america - how to control people so they don't rebell. the GOP regulates sex, personal privacy, and other aspects of individualism - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty.- the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' Do not need to defeat the Marines. Look what one guy with a single gun in Sarajevo caused in 1914. |
Hoping for failure
On Oct 13, 2:39*am, "CalifBill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' Do not need to defeat the Marines. *Look what one guy with a single gun in Sarajevo caused in 1914.- newsflash: this isn't serbia. newsflash II: iraq had no gun control at all until the americans came now go back and get your shinebox. |
Hoping for failure
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 2:39 am, "CalifBill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' Do not need to defeat the Marines. Look what one guy with a single gun in Sarajevo caused in 1914.- newsflash: this isn't serbia. newsflash II: iraq had no gun control at all until the americans came now go back and get your shinebox. They had a lot of body doubles and lots of secret police. |
Hoping for failure
|
Hoping for failure
|
Hoping for failure
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:45:10 -0400, "mmc" wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message ... In article 4ad341f8$0$4984 ting.com, says... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 11, 3:19 pm, Canuck57 wrote: wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? to get us out of the economic collapse caused by the GOP - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. the GOP cuts taxes for the rich while raising them on the middle class to support their social darwinist/calvinist view of america - how to control people so they don't rebell. the GOP regulates sex, personal privacy, and other aspects of individualism - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty.- the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' We have more than our share but for some reason "Canuck" feels a need to venture south accross the virtual border and add his stupid 2 cents. Canadian cents that is. The fact is we just don't want the world to see Chicago eat all of the seed money in their typical pay for play politics... Even if you support Obama, it should be clear he is a criminal and supports criminal activity... Period.. We don't need the world to see that... Lobbyist pay Fed and State politicians for access and influence everyday. "It's just the way things are done". Anyone that takes this money is a crook and should be bounced out on thier ass. I'm certain they get away with this crap because Americans are too wrapped up in thier lives to pay attention. Lobbying should be outlawed and a limit set to 3 terms or less. It's not a Rep or Dem thing, it's both and they may not start out dirty but most turn out that way. It's the election process that's at fault. They should be publicly funded and not open to influence by corporations or individuals. |
Hoping for failure
jps wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:45:10 -0400, "mmc" wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article 4ad341f8$0$4984 ting.com, says... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 11, 3:19 pm, Canuck57 wrote: wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? to get us out of the economic collapse caused by the GOP - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. the GOP cuts taxes for the rich while raising them on the middle class to support their social darwinist/calvinist view of america - how to control people so they don't rebell. the GOP regulates sex, personal privacy, and other aspects of individualism - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty.- the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' We have more than our share but for some reason "Canuck" feels a need to venture south accross the virtual border and add his stupid 2 cents. Canadian cents that is. The fact is we just don't want the world to see Chicago eat all of the seed money in their typical pay for play politics... Even if you support Obama, it should be clear he is a criminal and supports criminal activity... Period.. We don't need the world to see that... Lobbyist pay Fed and State politicians for access and influence everyday. "It's just the way things are done". Anyone that takes this money is a crook and should be bounced out on thier ass. I'm certain they get away with this crap because Americans are too wrapped up in thier lives to pay attention. Lobbying should be outlawed and a limit set to 3 terms or less. It's not a Rep or Dem thing, it's both and they may not start out dirty but most turn out that way. It's the election process that's at fault. They should be publicly funded and not open to influence by corporations or individuals. So why did O$Bama opt out of public campaign funding. |
Hoping for failure
"CalifBill" wrote in message ... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 2:39 am, "CalifBill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' Do not need to defeat the Marines. Look what one guy with a single gun in Sarajevo caused in 1914.- newsflash: this isn't serbia. newsflash II: iraq had no gun control at all until the americans came now go back and get your shinebox. They had a lot of body doubles and lots of secret police. Iraq turned into the wild wild west after we showed up Bill. Because of the brain surgeons at DoD and the White House, when the 400,000 man Army went home (and the police), they all took thier weapons. There were ammo caches everywhere. The ASPs were left open and raided daily - it was like a free day at the flea market with ali babbas (local term for thieves) hauling off truckloads of sh*t. The very same sh*t that is still killing Americans over there. My camp was in Saddams garden just outside the backdoor of the palace in Bagdad and AK fire was a nightly occurance. Whenever patrols checked houses they'd check weapons and each was allowed 1 AK for protection. |
Hoping for failure
In article , says...
jps wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:45:10 -0400, "mmc" wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article 4ad341f8$0$4984 ting.com, says... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 11, 3:19 pm, Canuck57 wrote: wf3h wrote: On Oct 11, 1:56 pm, Jim wrote: The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't deserve it. There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all. Go ahead and argue that point. the GOP thinks only of power not america not working people just power So? Makes them a lesser evil. Lib-dims think of many things: - how good is the credit so they can overspend and debt-corruption spend? to get us out of the economic collapse caused by the GOP - how to tax people more so they have more to spend on corruption. the GOP cuts taxes for the rich while raising them on the middle class to support their social darwinist/calvinist view of america - how to control people so they don't rebell. the GOP regulates sex, personal privacy, and other aspects of individualism - take guns away so they can't fight back, Lib-dims fear real Liberty.- the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' We have more than our share but for some reason "Canuck" feels a need to venture south accross the virtual border and add his stupid 2 cents. Canadian cents that is. The fact is we just don't want the world to see Chicago eat all of the seed money in their typical pay for play politics... Even if you support Obama, it should be clear he is a criminal and supports criminal activity... Period.. We don't need the world to see that... Lobbyist pay Fed and State politicians for access and influence everyday. "It's just the way things are done". Anyone that takes this money is a crook and should be bounced out on thier ass. I'm certain they get away with this crap because Americans are too wrapped up in thier lives to pay attention. Lobbying should be outlawed and a limit set to 3 terms or less. It's not a Rep or Dem thing, it's both and they may not start out dirty but most turn out that way. It's the election process that's at fault. They should be publicly funded and not open to influence by corporations or individuals. So why did O$Bama opt out of public campaign funding. Because he said he wouldn't man, get with it.. Everything he said during the campaign was just a headfake... |
Hoping for failure
"mmc" wrote in message g.com... "CalifBill" wrote in message ... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 2:39 am, "CalifBill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' Do not need to defeat the Marines. Look what one guy with a single gun in Sarajevo caused in 1914.- newsflash: this isn't serbia. newsflash II: iraq had no gun control at all until the americans came now go back and get your shinebox. They had a lot of body doubles and lots of secret police. Iraq turned into the wild wild west after we showed up Bill. Because of the brain surgeons at DoD and the White House, when the 400,000 man Army went home (and the police), they all took thier weapons. There were ammo caches everywhere. The ASPs were left open and raided daily - it was like a free day at the flea market with ali babbas (local term for thieves) hauling off truckloads of sh*t. The very same sh*t that is still killing Americans over there. My camp was in Saddams garden just outside the backdoor of the palace in Bagdad and AK fire was a nightly occurance. Whenever patrols checked houses they'd check weapons and each was allowed 1 AK for protection. Very true on the CF by the Pols and military, but the question was why did Saddam still live, without gun control. |
Hoping for failure
"CalifBill" wrote in message ... "mmc" wrote in message g.com... "CalifBill" wrote in message ... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 2:39 am, "CalifBill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' Do not need to defeat the Marines. Look what one guy with a single gun in Sarajevo caused in 1914.- newsflash: this isn't serbia. newsflash II: iraq had no gun control at all until the americans came now go back and get your shinebox. They had a lot of body doubles and lots of secret police. Iraq turned into the wild wild west after we showed up Bill. Because of the brain surgeons at DoD and the White House, when the 400,000 man Army went home (and the police), they all took thier weapons. There were ammo caches everywhere. The ASPs were left open and raided daily - it was like a free day at the flea market with ali babbas (local term for thieves) hauling off truckloads of sh*t. The very same sh*t that is still killing Americans over there. My camp was in Saddams garden just outside the backdoor of the palace in Bagdad and AK fire was a nightly occurance. Whenever patrols checked houses they'd check weapons and each was allowed 1 AK for protection. Very true on the CF by the Pols and military, but the question was why did Saddam still live, without gun control. No one that could/would have tried to harm Saddam was allowed in the forbidden city. Saddam, his sons, all thier cronies and the Republican Guard were the only ones allowed. Before the fall of the government the military and police had the weapons and the civilians may have whatever had been stolen from Kuwait during that invasion or picked up during the Iran/Iraq war. And remember, we gave the Shiite the high hard one when we egged them into an uprising against Saddam after the Gulf War and then left them hanging with no support. So they weren't real interested in doing ol Uncle Sams bidding. |
Hoping for failure
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:39:55 -0400, "mmc" wrote:
"CalifBill" wrote in message ... "mmc" wrote in message g.com... "CalifBill" wrote in message ... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 2:39 am, "CalifBill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message the GOP sells the gun myth to convince people that a 400 year old technology can defeat the US marines no wonder the US is in sad shape. too many morons like 'canuck' Do not need to defeat the Marines. Look what one guy with a single gun in Sarajevo caused in 1914.- newsflash: this isn't serbia. newsflash II: iraq had no gun control at all until the americans came now go back and get your shinebox. They had a lot of body doubles and lots of secret police. Iraq turned into the wild wild west after we showed up Bill. Because of the brain surgeons at DoD and the White House, when the 400,000 man Army went home (and the police), they all took thier weapons. There were ammo caches everywhere. The ASPs were left open and raided daily - it was like a free day at the flea market with ali babbas (local term for thieves) hauling off truckloads of sh*t. The very same sh*t that is still killing Americans over there. My camp was in Saddams garden just outside the backdoor of the palace in Bagdad and AK fire was a nightly occurance. Whenever patrols checked houses they'd check weapons and each was allowed 1 AK for protection. Very true on the CF by the Pols and military, but the question was why did Saddam still live, without gun control. No one that could/would have tried to harm Saddam was allowed in the forbidden city. Saddam, his sons, all thier cronies and the Republican Guard were the only ones allowed. Before the fall of the government the military and police had the weapons and the civilians may have whatever had been stolen from Kuwait during that invasion or picked up during the Iran/Iraq war. And remember, we gave the Shiite the high hard one when we egged them into an uprising against Saddam after the Gulf War and then left them hanging with no support. So they weren't real interested in doing ol Uncle Sams bidding. Courtesy of Bush Sr. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com