BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   The London Times gets it... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/110728-london-times-gets.html)

Lu Powell[_11_] October 10th 09 02:59 AM

The London Times gets it...
 
though not the loony left:

October 9, 2009 -



Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Michael Binyon




The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met
with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.

Rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan intent. It
was clearly seen by the Norwegian Nobel committee as a way of expressing
European gratitude for an end to the Bush Administration, approval for the
election of America's first black president and hope that Washington will
honour its promise to re-engage with the world.

Instead, the prize risks looking preposterous in its claims, patronising in
its intentions and demeaning in its attempt to build up a man who has barely
begun his period in office, let alone achieved any tangible outcome for
peace.

The pretext for the prize was Mr. Obama's decision to "strengthen
international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples". Many people will
point out that, while the President has indeed promised to "reset" relations
with Russia and offer a fresh start to relations with the Muslim world,
there is little so far to show for his fine words.

East-West relations are little better than they were six months ago, and any
change is probably due largely to the global economic downturn; and America's
vaunted determination to re-engage with the Muslim world has failed to make
any concrete progress towards ending the conflict between the Israelis and
the Palestinians.

There is a further irony in offering a peace prize to a president whose
principal preoccupation at the moment is when and how to expand the war in
Afghanistan.

The spectacle of Mr. Obama mounting the podium in Oslo to accept a prize
that once went to Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi and Mother Theresa would
be all the more absurd if it follows a White House decision to send up to
40,000 more US troops to Afghanistan. However just such a war may be deemed
in Western eyes, Muslims would not be the only group to complain that peace
is hardly compatible with an escalation in hostilities.

The Nobel committee has made controversial awards before. Some have appeared
to reward hope rather than achievement: the 1976 prize for the two peace
campaigners in Northern Ireland, Betty Williams and Mairead Corrigan, was
clearly intended to send a signal to the two battling communities in Ulster.
But the political influence of the two winners turned out, sadly, to be
negligible.

In the Middle East, the award to Menachem Begin of Israel and Anwar Sadat of
Egypt in 1978 also looks, in retrospect, as naive as the later award to
Yassir Arafat, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin - although it could be argued
that both the Camp David and Oslo accords, while not bringing peace, were at
least attempts to break the deadlock.

Mr. Obama's prize is more likely, however, to be compared with the most
contentious prize of all: the 1973 prize to Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho
for their negotiations to end the Vietnam war. Dr Kissinger was branded a
warmonger for his support for the bombing campaign in Cambodia; and the
Vietnamese negotiator was subsequently seen as a liar whose government never
intended to honour a peace deal but was waiting for the moment to attack
South Vietnam.

Mr. Obama becomes the third sitting US President to receive the prize. The
committee said today that he had "captured the world's attention". It is
certainly true that his energy and aspirations have dazzled many of his
supporters. Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.





John H[_9_] October 10th 09 12:27 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

though not the loony left:

October 9, 2009 -



Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Michael Binyon




The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met
with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.


snipped

Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.

Jim October 10th 09 03:25 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
John H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

though not the loony left:

October 9, 2009 -



Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Michael Binyon




The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met
with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.


snipped

Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.


I haven't been following this bizarre story but I seem to recall hearing
Barry as being quoted that "I don't deserve it". It's so rare that he is
caught telling the truth, we should implant that quote in our memory of
him. It is sure to become a classic along with "I did not have sex with
that woman" and probably several others that I cannot recall at this
moment.

Roger October 11th 09 04:59 AM

The London Times gets it...
 
John H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

though not the loony left:

October 9, 2009 -



Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Michael Binyon




The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met
with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.


snipped

Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.


And you can expect no comments from the usual suspects...

John H[_9_] October 11th 09 01:04 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:59:30 -0400, Roger
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

though not the loony left:

October 9, 2009 -



Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Michael Binyon




The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met
with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.


snipped

Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.


And you can expect no comments from the usual suspects...


It's a damn shame. Here Don proudly posts an article about the
accomplishments of some folks up his way - enough to earn a Nobel
prize. A couple days later this fiasco occurs, giving the medal all
the prestige of a golf ball marker.

Damn shame.

Tim October 11th 09 01:54 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
On Oct 11, 7:04*am, John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:59:30 -0400, Roger
wrote:



John H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


though not the loony left:


October 9, 2009 -


Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Michael Binyon


The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met
with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.


snipped


Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.


And you can expect no comments from the usual suspects...


It's a damn shame. Here Don proudly posts an article about the
accomplishments of some folks up his way - enough to earn a Nobel
prize. A couple days later this fiasco occurs, giving the medal all
the prestige of a golf ball marker.

Damn shame.


John, does this now mean that If can actually type an exceptional
sentence with perfect spelling. I could be up for a Pulitzer?

Jim October 11th 09 02:51 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
Tim wrote:
On Oct 11, 7:04 am, John H wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:59:30 -0400, Roger
wrote:



John H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:
though not the loony left:
October 9, 2009 -
Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize
Michael Binyon
The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met
with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.
snipped
Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.
And the last sentence says it all.
And you can expect no comments from the usual suspects...

It's a damn shame. Here Don proudly posts an article about the
accomplishments of some folks up his way - enough to earn a Nobel
prize. A couple days later this fiasco occurs, giving the medal all
the prestige of a golf ball marker.

Damn shame.


John, does this now mean that If can actually type an exceptional
sentence with perfect spelling. I could be up for a Pulitzer?


What's the going rate for a Pulitzer these days?

John H[_9_] October 11th 09 06:01 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:54:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.


And you can expect no comments from the usual suspects...


It's a damn shame. Here Don proudly posts an article about the
accomplishments of some folks up his way - enough to earn a Nobel
prize. A couple days later this fiasco occurs, giving the medal all
the prestige of a golf ball marker.

Damn shame.


John, does this now mean that If can actually type an exceptional
sentence with perfect spelling. I could be up for a Pulitzer?


I do believe that's possible. Just try to type the sentence *after*
you're awarded the prize. That'll put you on the same type pedestal as
our hero, the big O.

Note the past tense in this: ""...and one part to the person who shall
have done the most or the best work..."

As 'Bama had done nothing prior to his selection, all rules are off
the table as far as selections go.

So, how are you going to spend your prize money? New boat?



Jim October 11th 09 06:54 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
Jim wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

though not the loony left:

October 9, 2009 -



Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace
prize
Michael Binyon




The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be
met with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and
probably deep embarrassment by the President himself.


snipped

Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of
all previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.


I haven't been following this bizarre story but I seem to recall hearing
Barry as being quoted that "I don't deserve it". It's so rare that he is
caught telling the truth, we should implant that quote in our memory of
him. It is sure to become a classic along with "I did not have sex with
that woman" and probably several others that I cannot recall at this
moment.



The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't
deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.

H the K[_2_] October 11th 09 06:56 PM

The London Times gets it...
 
On 10/11/09 1:54 PM, Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
John H wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:59:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

though not the loony left:

October 9, 2009 -



Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace
prize
Michael Binyon




The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will
be met with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals
and probably deep embarrassment by the President himself.

snipped

Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of
all previous winners have been diminished.


And the last sentence says it all.


I haven't been following this bizarre story but I seem to recall
hearing Barry as being quoted that "I don't deserve it". It's so rare
that he is caught telling the truth, we should implant that quote in
our memory of him. It is sure to become a classic along with "I did
not have sex with that woman" and probably several others that I
cannot recall at this moment.



The US does not get the Olympics, the Republican Party cheers, the
President gets the Nobel Peace prize and the Republican's say he didn't
deserve it.

There is no wondering whose side they are on. Traitors all.

Go ahead and argue that point.



There's no doubt that Republican/Conservatives hate America. Just look
at the Republican/Conservative trash that logs on and posts here.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com