John H wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:18:39 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article , says...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009

It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what anyone else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't matter,
does it?
It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up... You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...

You're right. As Harry pointed out, the prize was to have been awarded
to, "...someone or some organization who "...shall have done the most
or the best work..."

Note the past tense - 'shall have done'.

Obama had not done squat when the decision was made.

And it seems he is still constipated.

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/11/09 8:18 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009


It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what anyone
else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your
vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't matter,
does it?

It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up... You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...


What Nobel intended, since you are too stupid and intellectually lazy to
look it up is that the prize be awarded to someone or some organization
who "...shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between
nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the
holding and promotion of peace congresses."




--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All


You made his point about blindness, Harry. "...there are none so blind..."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:18:39 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the
honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009


It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what
anyone else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your
vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't matter,
does it?

It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up... You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...

You're right. As Harry pointed out, the prize was to have been awarded
to, "...someone or some organization who "...shall have done the most
or the best work..."

Note the past tense - 'shall have done'.

Obama had not done squat when the decision was made.


Nope... not true. They only voted recently. He's accomplished more toward
peace since he took office than Bush did in eight years.


--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/11/09 8:04 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:18:39 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the
honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009


It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what
anyone else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your
vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't matter,
does it?

It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up... You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...

You're right. As Harry pointed out, the prize was to have been awarded
to, "...someone or some organization who "...shall have done the most
or the best work..."

Note the past tense - 'shall have done'.

Obama had not done squat when the decision was made.


Nope... not true. They only voted recently. He's accomplished more toward
peace since he took office than Bush did in eight years.



The right wing cretins don't realize that while there were 200 different
nominations made last February, the committee has spent most of the
intervening time deciding who should win.



--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

In article , says...

Tosk wrote:
In article , says...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009

It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what anyone else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't matter,
does it?

It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up... You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...

Cmon Scotty. I was just tweaking the ditsy one.

snerk

I am not Scotty, I AM "TOSK"!
Well, sometimes I am Scotty

In article , says...

H the K wrote:
On 10/11/09 8:18 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009


It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what
anyone else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your
vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't matter,
does it?

It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up... You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...


What Nobel intended, since you are too stupid and intellectually lazy to
look it up is that the prize be awarded to someone or some organization
who "...shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between
nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the
holding and promotion of peace congresses."




How does O'Bama fit that model? Clue me in.

Harry is a pedo, high school drop out, **** him...

On 10/12/09 8:56 PM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

H the K wrote:
On 10/11/09 8:18 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009


It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what
anyone else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your
vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't matter,
does it?

It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up... You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...


What Nobel intended, since you are too stupid and intellectually lazy to
look it up is that the prize be awarded to someone or some organization
who "...shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between
nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the
holding and promotion of peace congresses."




How does O'Bama fit that model? Clue me in.

Harry is a pedo, high school drop out, **** him...


Stop projecting, moron. "I" don't spend my weekends in tents with
underaged girls...*you* do.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

H the K wrote:
On 10/12/09 8:56 PM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

H the K wrote:
On 10/11/09 8:18 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
From MSNBC, no less (of course, someone will get fired for
letting
this cat out ot the bag).

"An online straw poll by MSNBC asked whether Obama deserved the
honor.
About 62 percent of more than 194,000 answers said no, about 24
percent said yes, while 13 percent said some day, but the award was
premature."

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-B...5983AM20091009



It's up to the Nobel committee, so it really doesn't matter what
anyone else
thinks. But, continue to use this if you think it'll enhance your
vision of
America.

You're right. They can hand out their prizes to whomever they damn
please. They don't have to justify their decisions to anyone. Who
knows.
Maybe they just draw straws to pick a winner. It really doesn't
matter,
does it?

It should matter what old man Nobel "intended" when he set it up...
You
are so blinded by Obamamesiah, you can't even think straight when it
comes to this...


What Nobel intended, since you are too stupid and intellectually
lazy to
look it up is that the prize be awarded to someone or some organization
who "...shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity
between
nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the
holding and promotion of peace congresses."




How does O'Bama fit that model? Clue me in.

Harry is a pedo, high school drop out, **** him...


Stop projecting, moron. "I" don't spend my weekends in tents with
underaged girls...*you* do.


What's next? "I know you are but what am I?" That was a sad post from
an alleged adult and, worse, from an alleged writer. That said, you
post more about dreaming to be with beautiful women than anyone here.

Keep dreaming...