| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.
He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Oct 9, 8:07*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. *He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, *the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. *Only it's not April. he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7 years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is improving, he's moving on health care.. IOW he's achieved more in 8 months than bush did in 8 years... |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Oct 9, 8:13*am, H the K wrote:
On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All i think we better get 'em some rabies medicine... |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Oct 9, 8:07*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. *He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, *the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. *Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
|
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:07:06 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. What this illustrates is that the Nobel Peace Prize has been "dumbed-down." -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:22:22 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. As it stands now, it's only an award for celebrity. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
|
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
|
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 9:42 AM, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN the recognition? Why be in such haste? The criteria for the award is set by the Nobel committee. Obama met the committee's criteria. The side benefit is that it is giving many righties apoplexy. That in itself is worthy of recognition. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:45:03 -0400, Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN the recognition? Why be in such haste? It's just a payoff for celebrity... Nothing more. It's crap like this that reduces the respect given for *any* Nobel Prize. The prize is no longer the mark of achievement it once was. Whether it bothers 'righties' or not is beside the point. It's obvious the Nobel Committee has reduced its standards to 'be a celebrity'. Damn shame, but quite humorous. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 9:59 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:41:02 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 9:30 AM, wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:22:22 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. As it stands now, it's only an award for celebrity. You righties seem to think what you call your "points" should be addressed. By now, you should have figured out that I don't give a flying **** about the opinions of you righties. All they are are opportunities for ridicule, and not worthy of serious response. The Nobel Committee sets the criteria for awarding the prizes, not a bunch of low-brain-output righties. Have a nice dull day. Unlike those on the right, I'm always glad when Americans and America win positive recognition in the world. Unlike those on the right, I love America. What's obvious is that you are incapable of refuting Jack's "point." Of course, if your desire is to imitate or emulate the President, proffering empty rhetoric like you have just done might win you the Nobel Peace Prize. i don't give a crap about jack or his point. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:28:34 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/9/09 9:59 AM, wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:41:02 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 9:30 AM, wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:22:22 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. As it stands now, it's only an award for celebrity. You righties seem to think what you call your "points" should be addressed. By now, you should have figured out that I don't give a flying **** about the opinions of you righties. All they are are opportunities for ridicule, and not worthy of serious response. The Nobel Committee sets the criteria for awarding the prizes, not a bunch of low-brain-output righties. Have a nice dull day. Unlike those on the right, I'm always glad when Americans and America win positive recognition in the world. Unlike those on the right, I love America. What's obvious is that you are incapable of refuting Jack's "point." Of course, if your desire is to imitate or emulate the President, proffering empty rhetoric like you have just done might win you the Nobel Peace Prize. i don't give a crap about jack or his point. Of course not. That's exactly why you didn't invest in a comment on Jack's "point." -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07*am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. *He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, *the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. *Only it's not April. he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7 years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is improving, he's moving on health care.. Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that Iraq. His words. Oh, by the way? The person who nominated him and pushed it? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...nderstood.html Here's a choice quote - one of many. "The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or justice for women, with sharia compliance." Really. How about that. Under shari’a law, a woman’s testimony in court only counts for half of that of a man. If a woman is raped, she needs four male witnesses to prove her case. If she makes the accusation and doesn’t find four witnesses, the victim gets charged with fornication or adultery and faces death. She also believes that women should not be in public office. I wonder if she knows "Mam" Boxer or Botox Pelosi? Come on man, you're smarter than that. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 10:41 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that Iraq. His words. Poor Tom...he's drowning in a vat full of sour grapes. But...what would you expect from a fan of Sarah Palin? -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
H the K wrote:
On 10/9/09 9:30 AM, wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:22:22 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. As it stands now, it's only an award for celebrity. You righties seem to think what you call your "points" should be addressed. By now, you should have figured out that I don't give a flying **** about the opinions of you righties. All they are are opportunities for ridicule, and not worthy of serious response. The Nobel Committee sets the criteria for awarding the prizes, not a bunch of low-brain-output righties. Have a nice dull day. Unlike those on the right, I'm always glad when Americans and America win positive recognition in the world. Unlike those on the right, I love America. Sure you do. WAFA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPbIls0iOnI |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:42:10 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN the recognition? Why be in such haste? It's obvious - they've lost thier collective minds. And even the Left is wondering what the hell happened. "The time has not yet arrived and circumstances have not yet evolved where Barack Obama is anywhere near the point where he has earned this prize. I don't blame him for this capricious action; it was the Nobel Peace Committee which committed the offense, which no doubt has Alfred Nobel thumping his head against his casket." Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_314899.html Anybody want to bet he wins the Literature prize for "Dreams of My Father"? It would make as much sense. And we're finally getting Obama jokes - and we all know what happens when a President becomes the butt of jokes. Ezra Klein: Obama also awarded Nobel prize in chemistry. "He's just got great chemistry," says Nobel Committee. Barack Obama’s Teleprompter: Big Guy says Bill Clinton called and was gracious in defeat; offered to fly Kanye West over 4 the Nobel awards ceremony Headline over AP analysis by White House correspondent Jennifer Loven: He Won, But For What? My personal favorite: Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy Carter became Jimmy Carter. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 10:57 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:42:10 -0400, Gene wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN the recognition? Why be in such haste? It's obvious - they've lost thier collective minds. And even the Left is wondering what the hell happened. "The time has not yet arrived and circumstances have not yet evolved where Barack Obama is anywhere near the point where he has earned this prize. I don't blame him for this capricious action; it was the Nobel Peace Committee which committed the offense, which no doubt has Alfred Nobel thumping his head against his casket." Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_314899.html Anybody want to bet he wins the Literature prize for "Dreams of My Father"? It would make as much sense. And we're finally getting Obama jokes - and we all know what happens when a President becomes the butt of jokes. Ezra Klein: Obama also awarded Nobel prize in chemistry. "He's just got great chemistry," says Nobel Committee. Barack Obama’s Teleprompter: Big Guy says Bill Clinton called and was gracious in defeat; offered to fly Kanye West over 4 the Nobel awards ceremony Headline over AP analysis by White House correspondent Jennifer Loven: He Won, But For What? My personal favorite: Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy Carter became Jimmy Carter. Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:45:28 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/9/09 10:41 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that Iraq. His words. Poor Tom...he's drowning in a vat full of sour grapes. In your 'opinion,' it's not that Tom laments the travesty that the Nobel Peace Prize, a once, fairly meritorious award, has become. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 9-Oct-2009, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Makes nuthin but sense! Now he's under pressure to pull out of Afghanistan, or he's seen as a war monger. He's in deep doo doo - by design by the assholes in Oslo. If he sends more troops for the enemy to kill while being prohibited from being on the offensive, the bedwetters will squeal. Rest assured the jerk isn't happy about this event. He SHOULD get out of VietGhanistan. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:02:01 GMT, "Steve"
wrote: On 9-Oct-2009, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Makes nuthin but sense! Now he's under pressure to pull out of Afghanistan, or he's seen as a war monger. He's in deep doo doo - by design by the assholes in Oslo. If he sends more troops for the enemy to kill while being prohibited from being on the offensive, the bedwetters will squeal. Rest assured the jerk isn't happy about this event. I just saw an analysis of that - it makes perfect sense. He SHOULD get out of VietGhanistan. We can hold the line in Afghanistan, but win it? No way. Again, we don't have the boots on the ground - just like Iraq under Bone Brain Rumsfield. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote: My personal favorite: Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy Carter became Jimmy Carter. Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace. Why would ANYONE covet joining a fraternity with similarly "awarded" members like Idiot Carter and Yasshole Arafat??? |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 11:15 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:02:01 GMT, wrote: On 9-Oct-2009, Tom Francis - wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Makes nuthin but sense! Now he's under pressure to pull out of Afghanistan, or he's seen as a war monger. He's in deep doo doo - by design by the assholes in Oslo. If he sends more troops for the enemy to kill while being prohibited from being on the offensive, the bedwetters will squeal. Rest assured the jerk isn't happy about this event. I just saw an analysis of that - it makes perfect sense. He SHOULD get out of VietGhanistan. We can hold the line in Afghanistan, but win it? No way. Again, we don't have the boots on the ground - just like Iraq under Bone Brain Rumsfield. It wouldn't matter how many boots we had on the ground in Afghanistan. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote: Again, we don't have the boots on the ground - just like Iraq under Bone Brain Rumsfield. It wouldn't matter how many boots we had on the ground in Afghanistan. That's correct! Good going - one out of a hundred is a start! Morons like Bush and Obama think they need to kill or suppress the "evildoers" or in more stupid terms, the "insurgents." What is being fought is a culture. It will never, ever succeed. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
|
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 10/9/09 11:58 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 9-Oct-2009, H the wrote: My personal favorite: Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy Carter became Jimmy Carter. Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace. Why would ANYONE covet joining a fraternity with similarly "awarded" members like Idiot Carter and Yasshole Arafat??? The Nobel Peace prize is not given for peace, or accomplishments. It's a Joke and is only given to folks who see the world the way the idiots on the committee do... It's just another private club for "one worlders". Ahhh...it's always helpful to have the moron view of the world so ably presented by a moron...like Scott Ingersoll. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
|
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:53:26 -0400, Jim wrote:
H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 9:30 AM, wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:22:22 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. As it stands now, it's only an award for celebrity. You righties seem to think what you call your "points" should be addressed. By now, you should have figured out that I don't give a flying **** about the opinions of you righties. All they are are opportunities for ridicule, and not worthy of serious response. The Nobel Committee sets the criteria for awarding the prizes, not a bunch of low-brain-output righties. Have a nice dull day. Unlike those on the right, I'm always glad when Americans and America win positive recognition in the world. Unlike those on the right, I love America. Sure you do. WAFA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPbIls0iOnI Wow, Harry's sure changed his attitude about the USA in the past two days! A year ago it was Costa Rica he was in love with. Anyway, the Red Skelton video should be mandatory in every public school classroom in America. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
"H the K" wrote in message m... On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. Alfred must be spinning in his grave at the warping of the award. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
"H the K" wrote in message m... On 10/9/09 9:42 AM, Gene wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is. Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN the recognition? Why be in such haste? The criteria for the award is set by the Nobel committee. Obama met the committee's criteria. The side benefit is that it is giving many righties apoplexy. That in itself is worthy of recognition. Makes the Nobel Committee less than nothing. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:41:02 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 9:30 AM, wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:22:22 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. As it stands now, it's only an award for celebrity. You righties seem to think what you call your "points" should be addressed. By now, you should have figured out that I don't give a flying **** about the opinions of you righties. All they are are opportunities for ridicule, and not worthy of serious response. The Nobel Committee sets the criteria for awarding the prizes, not a bunch of low-brain-output righties. Have a nice dull day. Unlike those on the right, I'm always glad when Americans and America win positive recognition in the world. Unlike those on the right, I love America. What's obvious is that you are incapable of refuting Jack's "point." Of course, if your desire is to imitate or emulate the President, proffering empty rhetoric like you have just done might win you the Nobel Peace Prize. -- Actually the Nobel committee has proved they are a bunch of Low Brain Output people. And HK is proving it also. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:57:12 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: It's obvious - they've lost thier collective minds. And even the Left is wondering what the hell happened. Not exactly the first questionable Peace Prize award: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/p...994/index.html http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/p...007/index.html Yasser Arafat? Arguably one of the first Middle Eastern terrorists? |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 9-Oct-2009, Tosk wrote: Morons like Bush and Obama think they need to kill or suppress the "evildoers" or in more stupid terms, the "insurgents." What is being fought is a culture. It will never, ever succeed. Now it's you putting all Muslims in the same pot (racist) when it's only a few who are really in need of a bullet, not a whole "culture"... Nope. Just 90% in Afghanistan. Racism is about a race. It has nothing to do with a cultures population. Most in Afghanistan don't know the concept of a unified country (much like the U.S.) or care. You are not going to succeed with bribes or psychotherapy. If you can convince the real Muslims that they can be protected, or protect themselves, or have a government that will protect them, they will solve the problem, just like we did here in the US with the KKK... The problem the population of Afghanistan is the same as Viet Nam - they see the U.S. as a problem. But there will always be individuals who are following some far off agenda and will need to be suppressed. Yes. 90% of the population. The U.S. should leave them alone. The plan to get them to "think like us" has never worked anywhere unless under a huge, oppressive thumb. Puppet governments imposed on them is useless and immoral. More importantly, don't get more servicemen killed in the futile effort. There's nothing to win. IF they were convinced and converted, the dedicated enemy will go elsewhere. Their recruitment is powerful and successful. Then it can start all over again. How many dead Americans are worth the effort?? Please provide a number where it should be cut off. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
On 9-Oct-2009, Tosk wrote: The Nobel Peace prize is not given for peace, or accomplishments. It's a Joke and is only given to folks who see the world the way the idiots on the committee do... It's just another private club for "one worlders". With less relevance than the U.N. |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
John H wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:53:26 -0400, Jim wrote: H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 9:30 AM, wrote: On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:22:22 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote: On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense. He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a freakin' year yet. Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize? There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved the prize? It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April. This could explain it: "- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful." "More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments." IOW, they hope he will change. Republicans hate America but hate peace even more. So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. As it stands now, it's only an award for celebrity. You righties seem to think what you call your "points" should be addressed. By now, you should have figured out that I don't give a flying **** about the opinions of you righties. All they are are opportunities for ridicule, and not worthy of serious response. The Nobel Committee sets the criteria for awarding the prizes, not a bunch of low-brain-output righties. Have a nice dull day. Unlike those on the right, I'm always glad when Americans and America win positive recognition in the world. Unlike those on the right, I love America. Sure you do. WAFA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPbIls0iOnI Wow, Harry's sure changed his attitude about the USA in the past two days! A year ago it was Costa Rica he was in love with. Anyway, the Red Skelton video should be mandatory in every public school classroom in America. It was the cheeky tikis he was in love with |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
"Steve" wrote in message ... On 9-Oct-2009, Tosk wrote: The Nobel Peace prize is not given for peace, or accomplishments. It's a Joke and is only given to folks who see the world the way the idiots on the committee do... It's just another private club for "one worlders". With less relevance than the U.N. Al Gore is probably thinking "I could have gotten the prize without all that junk science crapola I worked on." |
Obama wins Nobel Prize?
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com