On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote:

My personal favorite:

Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy
Carter became Jimmy Carter.


Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one
could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace.

Why would ANYONE covet joining a fraternity with similarly "awarded" members
like Idiot Carter and Yasshole Arafat???

In article ,
says...

On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote:

My personal favorite:

Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy
Carter became Jimmy Carter.


Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one
could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace.

Why would ANYONE covet joining a fraternity with similarly "awarded" members
like Idiot Carter and Yasshole Arafat???

The Nobel Peace prize is not given for peace, or accomplishments. It's a
Joke and is only given to folks who see the world the way the idiots on
the committee do... It's just another private club for "one worlders".

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:57:12 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

It's obvious - they've lost thier collective minds.

And even the Left is wondering what the hell happened.

Not exactly the first questionable Peace Prize award:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/p...994/index.html

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/p...007/index.html

Yasser Arafat? Arguably one of the first Middle Eastern terrorists?

Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

On Oct 10, 4:28*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. *Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Oct 10, 4:28 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it
is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

Reply:
How the hell is Obama cleaning up? By spending money we do not have, and
either borrow from the Saudi's of China? IF borrowing and spending made for
prosperity, the USSR would still be in existance and be the world's economic
leader.

On Oct 10, 5:49*pm, "CalifBill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Oct 10, 4:28 pm, Canuck57 wrote:





Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it
is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

Reply:
How the hell is Obama cleaning up? *By spending money we do not have,

why not go read john maynard keynes about why the GOP/free market
economic model is dead...

and
either borrow from the Saudi's of China? *IF borrowing and spending made for
prosperity, the USSR would still be in existance and be the world's economic
leader.-

you want a great depression? wall street stole the money from the
middle class so the middle class has to borrow and spend to make sure
the rich won't collapse and take the rest of the country with it.

it's the stockholm syndrome writ into economics

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 10, 4:28 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:
On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.
Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is.
Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?
You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

Like most short sighted Liberal denialists, when it looked like Obama
was going to win, the market crashed as investors always look forward
with a passioned rationality that Obama is bad news. Then once elected,
BO put forth the transition plan to Bush. Bush was against the bailouts
until BO, senate and congress pushed them.

In fact, because of the public being 80% against bailouts, senate and
congress initialy balked! Because in 2010 no senator or congressperson
wants to be tagged a bailout tax-debt-spender. So behind closed doors
BO, congress and the senate hatched the plan for Bush, an outgoing
president to take the heat.

While I agree Bush was part of it, BO, senate and congress were all 100%
behind the bailout corruption! That is why you didn't see BO object,
nor the congress cry misappropriation or the senate swing into the frey
- they all bowed to their super-rich buddies and bailed them out of GM,
Citi etc.

Americans got sold out by all of DC which supported the record
debt-corruption spend of all time. $1.3 trillion in well under a year.

On Oct 11, 11:59*am, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 10, 4:28 pm, Canuck57 wrote:

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

Like most short sighted Liberal denialists, when it looked like Obama
was going to win

according to the BLS, the market crashed in dec of 2007 before obama
even announced. you right wingers keep thinking obama's been
president for 8 years, forgetting it was YOUR policies and YOUR
president that destroyed the economy

, the market crashed as investors always look forward
with a passioned rationality that Obama is bad news. *Then once elected,
BO put forth the transition plan to Bush. *Bush was against the bailouts
until BO, senate and congress pushed them.

yeah bush wanted to continue his failed policies that rewarded the
rich by cutting their taxes and socializing their failures by having
the middle class pay for them



While I agree Bush was part of it

uh...part of it? the recession began even before obama announced he
was running....

and you guys think he was president even then....you guys remind me of
'pravda'...just spinning the lies believed only by children and
frightened right wingers


Americans got sold out by all of DC which supported the record
debt-corruption spend of all time. *$1.3 trillion in well under a year

because the GOP stole all the money the middle class could spend.

On Oct 9, 8:07*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. *He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also
preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda
and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise
he made including Gitmo, *the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing
down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown
more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth
shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the
bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost
the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize?

There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved
the prize?

It's a joke - has to be. *Only it's not April.

he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

IOW he's achieved more in 8 months than bush did in 8 years...