Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:45:57 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Ok - fair enough. Let's take a hypothetical journey. You're a Middle School science teacher and as part of the biology section you teach the section on evolution. Two students, solid A honor roll types tell you that they believe in the New Earth model as part of their religious upbringing - that it is a tenant of their belief system. What do you do? I would point out that they are entitled to their belief system, as are others who believe differently. I would also point out the differences between a belief system and the scientific method. Most of the problems arise when one group proclaims that their particular belief system is the only one that should have standing, demands that it be taught to everyone, and tries to influence legistation and other governmental functions to that end. The founding fathers of this country were very aware of this phenomenon thanks to ongoing struggles with the Church of England over the years, and that is why we have constitutional guarantees regarding the separation of church and state. If you love this country, you have to love the constitution also. They are inseparable but some people just don't get it. Thank you! Well said Wayne. -- Nom=de=Plume Actually the Constitution does not demand separation of church and state. IT demands that a state religion not be enabled. There are lots if religious references in the founding documents. They enabled any religion to be practiced. As long as it did not harm others. "Demand"? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . ." Seems relatively clear to me... -- Nom=de=Plume Yup, clear. Says the Congress shall not establish a religion, which would be a state religion. Goes back to the Church of England. And they said you could not prohibit the free exercise of a religion. Let religion put up a cross, menora, etc on public property. The people own the property. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Right-wing newspaper slams cretinism, er, creationism museum | General | |||
GOP blasts GOP | General | |||
OT Creationism or evolution? | General | |||
(OT) Reagan blasts Bush | General | |||
Billionaire Blasts Bush | General |