| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
vatican astronomer blasts creationism
"H the K" wrote in message m... On 10/6/09 1:59 AM, CalifBill wrote: "H the wrote in message m... On 10/5/09 3:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:55:29 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: All science is based on "viewpoints". What the heck do you think drives scientific inquiry? One scientist's view is that Global Warming is real. A different scientist looking at the same data calls bulls**t. Openheimer felt that testing an atom bomb would set the atmosphere on fire. Others didn't. None of those "viewpoints" are science however, just opinions or hypotheses. They become science, or not, after evaluation of the underlying theory (if any), experimental proof by multiple individuals, and peer review. Then it's not a viewpoint any longer. There isn't a thimbleful of evidence of any sort to support creationism. How did everything first start? One of SW Tom's alien ancestors was making a firecracker to show off for his buddies, and it got a little out of hand...resulting in a Big Bang. Where did the alien get his start? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Right-wing newspaper slams cretinism, er, creationism museum | General | |||
| GOP blasts GOP | General | |||
| OT Creationism or evolution? | General | |||
| (OT) Reagan blasts Bush | General | |||
| Billionaire Blasts Bush | General | |||
Threaded Mode
