Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:56:51 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:55:29 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: All science is based on "viewpoints". What the heck do you think drives scientific inquiry? One scientist's view is that Global Warming is real. A different scientist looking at the same data calls bulls**t. Openheimer felt that testing an atom bomb would set the atmosphere on fire. Others didn't. None of those "viewpoints" are science however, just opinions or hypotheses. They become science, or not, after evaluation of the underlying theory (if any), experimental proof by multiple individuals, and peer review. Then it's not a viewpoint any longer. Science is a continuing effort to discover and increase human knowledge and understanding through disciplined research. It sounds as though you don't consider any of the effort put into the reaching of conclusions as 'science', or the practice thereof. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Right-wing newspaper slams cretinism, er, creationism museum | General | |||
GOP blasts GOP | General | |||
OT Creationism or evolution? | General | |||
(OT) Reagan blasts Bush | General | |||
Billionaire Blasts Bush | General |