![]() |
Epic Fail
On Oct 3, 8:35 pm, The D wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Oct 3, 7:00 pm, The D wrote: Learn a new trick, pony. Obama is printing money at an unprecedented rate to pay *his* bills. uh...no. it was bernanke's policy under bush and it's been bernanke's policy under obama to stablize the economy via keynesian economics. this was necessary because bush's free market chicago school fundamentalism caused 1. an unprecedented transfer of wealth from the middle class to the rich 2. the collapse of the economy bush ****ed the middle class. obama's trying to clean up his mess. bush, not obama, has been president for the last 8 years The Dems have been in control of congress long enough to take responsibility for that *and* what preceded his inauguration, WAFA. The stimulus plan is hugely flawed. This, for example, is a ****ing joke! the stimulus plan was developed under bush by bernanke. i know you rednecks don't have a long memory, but DO try to keep up with events, m'kay? And Obama has decided to keep Ben Bernanke in his post at the Fed for four more years, m,kay? If he was doing such a bad job with Bush, why would he keep him?- jesus h. and myron w. christ...do you EVER read for comprehension? did i say he was doing a bad job? what i said was that the plan was developed by bernanke to control the damage started by bush. BUSH CREATED THE MELTDOWN. there. does that help you? |
Epic Fail
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:55:12 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: BUSH CREATED THE MELTDOWN. I don't think it's so simple. We need to make the stuff we use. The "service economy" only worked because it was built on ever increasing debt, the imaginary inflated values of stock equities and real estate, and foreign labor. It was destined to fail. Some good questions to always ask yourself: "What am I producing?" "Who is paying my wages?" "What are *they* producing?" "Will they run out of money to pay me?" Consider those questions for a while. Then...load the cooler into the boat and go fishing. --Vic |
Epic Fail
On Oct 3, 10:43*pm, "CalifBill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 3, 1:34 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Oct 3, 1:11 pm, wf3h wrote: the right doesn't like big cities because people have different ideas.. they romanticize the plantation mentality of the mid 19th century, where everyone knew their place. The Obama admin and the Dem congress have been huge failures having accomplished nothing except the destruction of our economy. uh...newsflash, genius: the economy collapsed under bush. i know you rednecks wish it wasnt true, but it's a fact. sorry to send you screaming into the night These people who think thye are so smart have completely failed at everything they have tried to do evn though they have nothing in their way. This is an historical level of failure and incompetence. says the guy who thinks obama's been president for 8 years. The economy was set to fail going back before bush. *Mostly because Greenspan let the economy go in to a dot.com bubble, and The Congress, under both parties spent almost all the excess revenue, and committed in to the future. *The Greenspan the Incompetant, made money almost free, along with The Congress to cause a housing bubble, with huge leverages, etc. *There was no way the economy was not going to melt down. *No matter who was in charge of The Presidency of The Congress at the time. *Bush did not help the situation by starting a 2nd front in Iraq, but there was going to be a failure anyway in the economy! *And Obama and The Congress has hurt the situation with his and The Congress EXCESS spending how is it excess spending if the consumer isnt spending? who's going to keep the economy moving? do we let it collapse? .. *Excess in the wrong places. *And he has taken more money from the middle class to give to the rich than Bush could imagine. *GoldmanSackus gave out $6.5 billion in bonus money. *Where did the money come from? *Mostly the $18 billion of the lots of billions Obama and The Congress gave to AIG to bail them out. *They did not earn any bonus. *They should have been fired by the Board of Directors and the stockholders for almost bankrupting the company. *Get your facts straight before kissing the ground that Obama and The Present Congress is walking on. *They should all be fired. the person who should be fired is milton friedman and the boys at the u. of chicago economics dept. |
Epic Fail
On 10/4/09 12:03 PM, Vic Smith wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:55:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote: BUSH CREATED THE MELTDOWN. I don't think it's so simple. We need to make the stuff we use. The "service economy" only worked because it was built on ever increasing debt, the imaginary inflated values of stock equities and real estate, and foreign labor. It was destined to fail. Some good questions to always ask yourself: "What am I producing?" "Who is paying my wages?" "What are *they* producing?" "Will they run out of money to pay me?" Consider those questions for a while. Then...load the cooler into the boat and go fishing. --Vic More accurately, Bush presided over the government during the major portion of "the meltdown," and did virtually nothing while it was happening. In retrospect, I think Bush was almost entirely detached from the duties of his office, and let his underlings handle almost every policy decision, so he could spend a huge chunk of his presidency on vacation. Bush was lazy physically, intellectually, and emotionally, about his presidency. He was the worst president of the past 100 years, and I don't think anyone else is even close. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Epic Fail
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:27:20 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/4/09 12:03 PM, Vic Smith wrote: On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:55:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote: BUSH CREATED THE MELTDOWN. I don't think it's so simple. We need to make the stuff we use. The "service economy" only worked because it was built on ever increasing debt, the imaginary inflated values of stock equities and real estate, and foreign labor. It was destined to fail. Some good questions to always ask yourself: "What am I producing?" "Who is paying my wages?" "What are *they* producing?" "Will they run out of money to pay me?" Consider those questions for a while. Then...load the cooler into the boat and go fishing. --Vic More accurately, Bush presided over the government during the major portion of "the meltdown," and did virtually nothing while it was happening. In retrospect, I think Bush was almost entirely detached from the duties of his office, and let his underlings handle almost every policy decision, so he could spend a huge chunk of his presidency on vacation. Bush was lazy physically, intellectually, and emotionally, about his presidency. He was the worst president of the past 100 years, and I don't think anyone else is even close. Bush is gone. Unemployment is here, at 9.8. Besides, Wall Street has been running the U.S. since at least the late 80's. The pols, both D and R, are still largely creatures of Wall Street and globalism. But that will change, dependant only on the sun rising. Be patient. That's the key to fishing too. Picking a good spot helps. --Vic |
Epic Fail
On 10/4/09 12:41 PM, Vic Smith wrote:
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:27:20 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/4/09 12:03 PM, Vic Smith wrote: On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:55:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote: BUSH CREATED THE MELTDOWN. I don't think it's so simple. We need to make the stuff we use. The "service economy" only worked because it was built on ever increasing debt, the imaginary inflated values of stock equities and real estate, and foreign labor. It was destined to fail. Some good questions to always ask yourself: "What am I producing?" "Who is paying my wages?" "What are *they* producing?" "Will they run out of money to pay me?" Consider those questions for a while. Then...load the cooler into the boat and go fishing. --Vic More accurately, Bush presided over the government during the major portion of "the meltdown," and did virtually nothing while it was happening. In retrospect, I think Bush was almost entirely detached from the duties of his office, and let his underlings handle almost every policy decision, so he could spend a huge chunk of his presidency on vacation. Bush was lazy physically, intellectually, and emotionally, about his presidency. He was the worst president of the past 100 years, and I don't think anyone else is even close. Bush is gone. Unemployment is here, at 9.8. Besides, Wall Street has been running the U.S. since at least the late 80's. The pols, both D and R, are still largely creatures of Wall Street and globalism. But that will change, dependant only on the sun rising. Be patient. That's the key to fishing too. Picking a good spot helps. --Vic Bush is gone, but his stench remains. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Epic Fail
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 3, 10:43 pm, "CalifBill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Oct 3, 1:34 pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Oct 3, 1:11 pm, wf3h wrote: the right doesn't like big cities because people have different ideas. they romanticize the plantation mentality of the mid 19th century, where everyone knew their place. The Obama admin and the Dem congress have been huge failures having accomplished nothing except the destruction of our economy. uh...newsflash, genius: the economy collapsed under bush. i know you rednecks wish it wasnt true, but it's a fact. sorry to send you screaming into the night These people who think thye are so smart have completely failed at everything they have tried to do evn though they have nothing in their way. This is an historical level of failure and incompetence. says the guy who thinks obama's been president for 8 years. The economy was set to fail going back before bush. Mostly because Greenspan let the economy go in to a dot.com bubble, and The Congress, under both parties spent almost all the excess revenue, and committed in to the future. The Greenspan the Incompetant, made money almost free, along with The Congress to cause a housing bubble, with huge leverages, etc. There was no way the economy was not going to melt down. No matter who was in charge of The Presidency of The Congress at the time. Bush did not help the situation by starting a 2nd front in Iraq, but there was going to be a failure anyway in the economy! And Obama and The Congress has hurt the situation with his and The Congress EXCESS spending how is it excess spending if the consumer isnt spending? who's going to keep the economy moving? do we let it collapse? .. Excess in the wrong places. And he has taken more money from the middle class to give to the rich than Bush could imagine. GoldmanSackus gave out $6.5 billion in bonus money. Where did the money come from? Mostly the $18 billion of the lots of billions Obama and The Congress gave to AIG to bail them out. They did not earn any bonus. They should have been fired by the Board of Directors and the stockholders for almost bankrupting the company. Get your facts straight before kissing the ground that Obama and The Present Congress is walking on. They should all be fired. the person who should be fired is milton friedman and the boys at the u. of chicago economics dept. Maybe, but they are not the ones in charge of policy and the money supply. |
Epic Fail
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 3, 8:35 pm, The D wrote: wf3h wrote: On Oct 3, 7:00 pm, The D wrote: Learn a new trick, pony. Obama is printing money at an unprecedented rate to pay *his* bills. uh...no. it was bernanke's policy under bush and it's been bernanke's policy under obama to stablize the economy via keynesian economics. this was necessary because bush's free market chicago school fundamentalism caused 1. an unprecedented transfer of wealth from the middle class to the rich 2. the collapse of the economy bush ****ed the middle class. obama's trying to clean up his mess. bush, not obama, has been president for the last 8 years The Dems have been in control of congress long enough to take responsibility for that *and* what preceded his inauguration, WAFA. The stimulus plan is hugely flawed. This, for example, is a ****ing joke! the stimulus plan was developed under bush by bernanke. i know you rednecks don't have a long memory, but DO try to keep up with events, m'kay? And Obama has decided to keep Ben Bernanke in his post at the Fed for four more years, m,kay? If he was doing such a bad job with Bush, why would he keep him?- jesus h. and myron w. christ...do you EVER read for comprehension? did i say he was doing a bad job? what i said was that the plan was developed by bernanke to control the damage started by bush. BUSH CREATED THE MELTDOWN. there. does that help you? Under the watch of the democratic congress? |
Epic Fail
On Oct 4, 7:52*pm, Roger wrote:
wf3h wrote: BUSH CREATED THE MELTDOWN. there. does that help you? Under the watch of the democratic congress?- unfortunately, no. for 6 of the last 8 years, the GOP ran the country. and they ran it into the ground at the behest of their paymasters |
Epic Fail
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:10:57 -0700, Jim wrote:
Hard to see how we could ever be a success at anything when there's so many people working for failure, and these are the guys who ignore the last eight years of failure. Wouldn't it be refreshing for someone on the left, or the right, to say something like: "Let's put our differences aside and do what's best for the country". |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com