"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:47 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:43 PM, Frogwatch wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on
the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".
Uh-huh. If Obama is a loser, your Republicans aren't even in the
contest. Hell, your party is dominated by the likes of Limbaugh, that
crazy broad representative from Minnesota (Bachmann), the quitter known
as Sarah Palin, Glenn the Crying Loonie Beck and a seemingly endless
list of perverts.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Dems, ya know yer scrapin bottom when the french call yur pres a
surrender monkey and an appeaser, not to mention the Brits who call
him "President Pantywaist".


News flash... if you're a US citizen, he's your president too. Are all
the French calling him this? All the Brits? Or, more likely a few people
here and there.
More here than there, Sweetie.


Perhaps if you're in some rural backwater... he won pretty handily both the
popular and electoral college vote.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 2:00 pm, Frogwatch wrote:

Dems, ya know yer scrapin bottom when the french call yur pres a
surrender monkey and an appeaser, not to mention the Brits who call
him "President Pantywaist".-

that's OK. they just called bush an asshole.


lol

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:57 -0400, JohnH wrote:


I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have come
across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her speech.

LOL, that's why the 2012 Olympics are to be in London, not New York.
Perhaps Laura, hell, even GWB, might have come across as more sincere,
but, when the competition for the 2012 Olympics was taking place, neither
of them got of their asses to go to Singapore to campaign for New York.
It's understandable. New York is a blue state.

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 3:26 pm, JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.

ROFLMAO!! since bush is widely known as a liar, there was no chance of
him getting a dog catcher's convention, let alone the olympics.


But, he did spend four days watching the Olympics instead of worrying about
two stupid wars that would take care of themselves!

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/2/09 4:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:51:58 -0400, wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:43 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on
the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".

Will we have a pronouncement on how the IOC is racist?


Or, more likely, they decided to give Brazil a chance, and they were
convinced the games would be financed properly.

I find it highly interesting that you and a couple of others continually
mention race. Are you compensating for something?

He's just projecting what Harry will say sooner or later.

I wonder what she expects when her BFF is calling us racist with every
post?

The IOC is obviously racist. That's one more reason Laura Bush would
have been successfull in getting the Olympics here. Well, maybe not in
Chicago, but at least in Crawford or Dallas or somewhere cool.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


What's a BFF? I think you're making that case all by yourself.




Herring *is* a racist. There's no question about it.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:29:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:57 -0400, JohnH wrote:


I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have come
across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her speech.

LOL, that's why the 2012 Olympics are to be in London, not New York.
Perhaps Laura, hell, even GWB, might have come across as more sincere,
but, when the competition for the 2012 Olympics was taking place, neither
of them got of their asses to go to Singapore to campaign for New York.
It's understandable. New York is a blue state.

Maybe they had sense?
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:29:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:57 -0400, JohnH wrote:


I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have come
across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her speech.

LOL, that's why the 2012 Olympics are to be in London, not New York.
Perhaps Laura, hell, even GWB, might have come across as more sincere,
but, when the competition for the 2012 Olympics was taking place, neither
of them got of their asses to go to Singapore to campaign for New York.
It's understandable. New York is a blue state.

Maybe they had sense?
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


Sense to not care much about the economy?

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:54:18 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA9Z8KEsNyo

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:45:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:54:18 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA9Z8KEsNyo

Sick. Quite funny, but sick.

Hee, hee.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

On Oct 2, 12:24*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:

Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.

He's too late. Blagojevich already tried that and look at where ti got
him....

?;^ Q