On Oct 2, 7:49*pm, Tim wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:24*pm, H the K wrote:

On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.

He's too late. Blagojevich already tried that and look at where ti got
him....

?;^ Q

Careful with your quoting. I didn't write the tripe above, that was
the short, portly dwarf. Please trim any reference to me when he's
involved.

H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.


Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~


Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.

When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?



Call your friend Senator Byrd. He has *someone* who keeps his schedule.

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54*pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.


Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

On Oct 2, 3:26*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54*pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". *~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.

ROFLMAO!! since bush is widely known as a liar, there was no chance of
him getting a dog catcher's convention, let alone the olympics.

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 3:26 pm, JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.

ROFLMAO!! since bush is widely known as a liar, there was no chance of
him getting a dog catcher's convention, let alone the olympics.


But, he did spend four days watching the Olympics instead of worrying about
two stupid wars that would take care of themselves!

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article 73189557-9508-4e20-ab5f-6395961e4fe1
@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 2, 3:26*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54*pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". *~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.

ROFLMAO!! since bush is widely known as a liar, there was no chance of
him getting a dog catcher's convention, let alone the olympics.

Have you ever looked at the time line.. It was the dem "do noting
congress" (as Pelosi called it) that pooched the economy by not reigning
in Dodd, Rangle, Kerry, and Obama from raiding the mortgage market... Gt
a clue man.

On Oct 4, 9:57*am, tiny wrote:
In article 73189557-9508-4e20-ab5f-6395961e4fe1
@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...







On Oct 2, 3:26*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54*pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". *~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.

ROFLMAO!! since bush is widely known as a liar, there was no chance of
him getting a dog catcher's convention, let alone the olympics.

Have you ever looked at the time line.. It was the dem "do noting
congress" (as Pelosi called it) that pooched the economy by not reigning
in Dodd, Rangle, Kerry, and Obama from raiding the mortgage market... Gt
a clue man.-

wall street raided the mortgage market, under the guise of the 'free
market'

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:57 -0400, JohnH wrote:


I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have come
across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her speech.

LOL, that's why the 2012 Olympics are to be in London, not New York.
Perhaps Laura, hell, even GWB, might have come across as more sincere,
but, when the competition for the 2012 Olympics was taking place, neither
of them got of their asses to go to Singapore to campaign for New York.
It's understandable. New York is a blue state.

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:29:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:57 -0400, JohnH wrote:


I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have come
across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her speech.

LOL, that's why the 2012 Olympics are to be in London, not New York.
Perhaps Laura, hell, even GWB, might have come across as more sincere,
but, when the competition for the 2012 Olympics was taking place, neither
of them got of their asses to go to Singapore to campaign for New York.
It's understandable. New York is a blue state.

Maybe they had sense?
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:29:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:57 -0400, JohnH wrote:


I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have come
across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her speech.

LOL, that's why the 2012 Olympics are to be in London, not New York.
Perhaps Laura, hell, even GWB, might have come across as more sincere,
but, when the competition for the 2012 Olympics was taking place, neither
of them got of their asses to go to Singapore to campaign for New York.
It's understandable. New York is a blue state.

Maybe they had sense?
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


Sense to not care much about the economy?

--
Nom=de=Plume