http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html

On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C.
Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes
but apes evolved from humans.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3

And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area.

Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution
goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah,
yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a
hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened
by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the
exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's
evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we
popped.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :)

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html

On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C.
Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes
but apes evolved from humans.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3

And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area.

Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution
goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah,
yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a
hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened
by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the
exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's
evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we
popped.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :)

I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but
anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution
theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are
calling it ardi or emmm or something like that.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html

On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C.
Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes
but apes evolved from humans.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3

And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area.

Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution
goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah,
yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a
hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened
by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the
exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's
evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we
popped.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :)

I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but
anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution
theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling
it ardi or emmm or something like that.

So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism?

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, "mmc" wrote:

So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism?

Evolution is a known fact so how does it score points on a theory
? They don't compete.

Casady

On 10/2/09 9:47 AM, Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, wrote:

So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism?

Evolution is a known fact so how does it score points on a theory
? They don't compete.

Casady


I saw a discussion on one of the right wing boards that claimed the
"discovery" was false, because creation took place about 6000 years ago.
These, of course, are the birther-deather-teabagger folk in their element.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, "mmc" wrote:

So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism?

Evolution is a known fact so how does it score points on a theory
? They don't compete.

Casady

Apples and grapes? I dunno, was trying to be funny. Been a long week.

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, "mmc" wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
. ..
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html

On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C.
Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes
but apes evolved from humans.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3

And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area.

Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution
goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah,
yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a
hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened
by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the
exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's
evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we
popped.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :)

I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but
anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution
theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling
it ardi or emmm or something like that.

So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism?


No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

On 10/2/09 11:58 AM, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400,
wrote:


No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo

There's no intelligence in intelligent design. It's just more religious
poppycock-bullship.




--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400, JohnH
wrote:


No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo

But, even the video admits, *someone or something* built the airplane.

It didn't just 'happen'.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:09:35 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:21:28 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400, JohnH
wrote:


No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo

But, even the video admits, *someone or something* built the airplane.

It didn't just 'happen'.

http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/

Hah, so you give the Higher Power a new name. So what?

*Someone* still built your airplane. It didn't just 'happen', did it?
Do you think maybe a little wood, glue, rubber, plastic, paint, etc.
just happened to fall from somewhere and accidentally land in that
form?

Go for it.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.