![]() |
|
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"H the K" wrote in message m... On 9/30/09 6:49 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Ultimately, the pen *is* mightier than the sword. If someone breaks into my house at night while we are at home, he is going to be facing a firearm pointed at him. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All You'd be firing blindly from under your desk, you wimpy, lard-ass, pillow biter. We're all scared to death of you... you might get a lucky shot! WAFA!!! --Mike |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:18:42 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: I have the .357 model 60 J frame 5 shot. A friend of mine has one of those J frame 5 shot revolvers. It's a very nice little weapon. My youngest's back up weapon for a while was a stubbie .38 - I shot it a couple of times - nice weapon. Ruger makes a six shot .357 in a stubbie version - can't remember the exact model number - I like that one a lot. They are talking about having a renewable carry permit here in CT - I'm not sure I could qualify to carry anymore. Hopefully, they will grandfather previous permits over. I hope. :) |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Sep 30, 8:40*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. *There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. *Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. *And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. *I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. *Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. *:) Tom, that's fine if you have the pepper. And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, If I were you, I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". :) Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"H the K" wrote in message m... On 9/30/09 9:37 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I have a S&W 38 frame hammerless retrofitted to .357. I really need a small frame revolver because I (1) have stubby fingers and (2) can't handle large frame revolvers any more. The nice thing about it is that it's not a normal "stubbie" - the barrel is two inches longer which improves accuracy up to about 45 yards or so. Gosh, just what are you shooting at offhand at 45 yards with improved accuracy with that retrofitted, 4" barrel revolver? Something really big? Notice how your ex-best friend doesn't respond to you anymore. Sheez, not only a year or so ago, you held Tom to the highest regard. Now, that he's realized what a worthless piece of garbage you are, you lambast him at every opportunity. You're such a nice guy, hairy. You must have lots of friends... besides donny, and slammie of course. --Mike |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"SteveB" wrote in message ... "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote I have a S&W 38 frame hammerless retrofitted to .357. I really need a small frame revolver because I (1) have stubby fingers and (2) can't handle large frame revolvers any more. I have the .357 model 60 J frame 5 shot. I have a Safariland paddle that I carry it on that is very comfortable and concealable. When I went to shoot it at The Gun Store in Vegas, I got all signed in, and the guy said, "Where's your gun?" I pulled it out, and he was surprised. It actually rides behind my midline. I like my KelTec 3AT for just a really concealable gun, and I don't care to hear any jokes or comments on the .380 Kurz, thank you very much. But when I want to feel safe, I take the Smith. At times, I like my Ruger P93DC just for firepower. It rides pretty comfortably on my appendix in a Galco. But still, the 3AT is a front pocket, back pocket, inside the belt really concealable gun. Nevada no longer has reciprocity with Utah, as Utah has no live fire qualifications when getting a CCF permit for Utah. So, I have to watch carrying in Nevada now. MHO YMMV Steve Just get a Nevada CCW also. I am pretty sure they have a non-resident program. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:23:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. Certainly a fine boat defense weapon... :-) Especially if it, um, "works". PS, have you ever heard of these guys? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On 9/30/09 11:18 PM, SteveB wrote:
"Tom Francis - wrote I have a S&W 38 frame hammerless retrofitted to .357. I really need a small frame revolver because I (1) have stubby fingers and (2) can't handle large frame revolvers any more. I have the .357 model 60 J frame 5 shot. I have a Safariland paddle that I carry it on that is very comfortable and concealable. When I went to shoot it at The Gun Store in Vegas, I got all signed in, and the guy said, "Where's your gun?" I pulled it out, and he was surprised. It actually rides behind my midline. I like my KelTec 3AT for just a really concealable gun, and I don't care to hear any jokes or comments on the .380 Kurz, thank you very much. But when I want to feel safe, I take the Smith. At times, I like my Ruger P93DC just for firepower. It rides pretty comfortably on my appendix in a Galco. But still, the 3AT is a front pocket, back pocket, inside the belt really concealable gun. Nevada no longer has reciprocity with Utah, as Utah has no live fire qualifications when getting a CCF permit for Utah. So, I have to watch carrying in Nevada now. MHO YMMV Steve I'm good for concealed carry from Delaware down to Florida, but I rarely carry unless we're taking a road trip down I-95 to Florida and we'll be driving at night. I don't drive north much these days, just a quick trip last summer to Connecticut. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:54:15 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:23:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. Certainly a fine boat defense weapon... :-) Especially if it, um, "works". PS, have you ever heard of these guys? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell Yep. The concept has been around for a while. Based on what I know, it seems like an awful lot of work to produce a rather insignificant increase in output - the input/output energy ratio if you will. I mean if you have to power the thing with a nuclear reactor to get a reactors worth of output plus 20% what's the point? Unless there is some significant and major development in containment technology, this is only an interesting experiment. And while it may advance the fusion power knowledge base, which is a good thing (I'm all for research and development), I still think that the only usable fusion power in quantities to power everything and anything, will be free space fusion power contained by magnetic bottles rather than physical bottles and that is only going to be done in space - not here on Earth where it is needed. It's a Holy Grail type search. I'm all for going for it, but I'm not holding out hope we'll get there in the next 50 years. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Oct 1, 12:23*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, *If I were you, *I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". *:) r-r-r-oger! |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On 10/1/09 8:06 AM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 1, 12:23 am, Tom Francis - SWSports And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, If I were you, I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". :) r-r-r-oger! An absolutely idiotic choice for a home defense weapon. Crikey, it must weigh four pounds. It's big, bulky, and fires a round that will likely go right through a house wall, through a neighbor's house wall, and kill that neighbor's cocker spaniel. It's sort of the Cigarette boat of pistols, used, no doubt, by the same sort of guys. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:18:42 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: I have the .357 model 60 J frame 5 shot. A friend of mine has one of those J frame 5 shot revolvers. It's a very nice little weapon. My youngest's back up weapon for a while was a stubbie .38 - I shot it a couple of times - nice weapon. Ruger makes a six shot .357 in a stubbie version - can't remember the exact model number - I like that one a lot. They are talking about having a renewable carry permit here in CT - I'm not sure I could qualify to carry anymore. Hopefully, they will grandfather previous permits over. I hope. :) I have the Ruger GP 100. It fits my hand the best of almost any gun I own. I also own a Colt Police Special in .22 LR caliber that was a training pistol for the Chicago PD way back when. Identical to the .38 except caliber. Even has the department holster. That one feels like a glove, too. Yes, the Rugers are large for concealed carry, but one instructor I talked to here said it was the only thing to have, shoulder holster and all. But then, he is just a tad more than weird. Short dick syndrome, I think. When I renewed my Utah CCF, all I had to do was send a current picture. It took about a week. Of course, I did have to stuff the envelope with the required amount of $$$, too. I hope yours is that easy. Utah has had controversy lately over their V-E-R-Y lax certification process and instructors. It seems illogical that something as important as a recert would not AT LEAST require a vision test or shooting test. What if a person has lost a lot of their sight, or hasn't shot a gun since last cert? It lost its reciprocity with Nevada for not having a live fire certification, so now when I go to Vegas (as I do tomorrow) I can only carry in the car, and have to carry pepper spray in the field. But lots of times, I do carry my Kel-Tec, as it is still registered there, and I have a boatload of relatives in the department. Some of the laws were changed this year, and I need to get up to speed on those. Good luck. No warning shots. Center mass. Steve |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 30, 8:40 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. :) Tom, that's fine if you have the pepper. And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, If I were you, I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". :) Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. For a piece of **** manufactured gun you can drag through the mud and then fire two magazines of ammo, yes, it is one fine weapon. Looks like the damn things will last until you fire the bore smooth, and then just keep firing. About as simple as a Model A Ford. Steve |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:23:52 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. Certainly a fine boat defense weapon... :-) Especially if it, um, "works". PS, have you ever heard of these guys? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell I have always loved the looks of the Mossberg Mariner. And that nine shot tube under the barrel makes it look like a 12 ga. over and under, 12 ga on both holes. A sturdy gun that will hold up to salt water. Somewhat. I'd like one for home defense, but I have a 1974 Remington 870 Wingmaster right now that werks fer me. Steve |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"CalifBill" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote I have a S&W 38 frame hammerless retrofitted to .357. I really need a small frame revolver because I (1) have stubby fingers and (2) can't handle large frame revolvers any more. I have the .357 model 60 J frame 5 shot. I have a Safariland paddle that I carry it on that is very comfortable and concealable. When I went to shoot it at The Gun Store in Vegas, I got all signed in, and the guy said, "Where's your gun?" I pulled it out, and he was surprised. It actually rides behind my midline. I like my KelTec 3AT for just a really concealable gun, and I don't care to hear any jokes or comments on the .380 Kurz, thank you very much. But when I want to feel safe, I take the Smith. At times, I like my Ruger P93DC just for firepower. It rides pretty comfortably on my appendix in a Galco. But still, the 3AT is a front pocket, back pocket, inside the belt really concealable gun. Nevada no longer has reciprocity with Utah, as Utah has no live fire qualifications when getting a CCF permit for Utah. So, I have to watch carrying in Nevada now. MHO YMMV Steve Just get a Nevada CCW also. I am pretty sure they have a non-resident program. I held a Nevada for about 15 years when I resided there, and some of that for a couple of years now that I moved to Utah. It's a two day process plus it's spendy. Just not worth it. I'm out in the field less now, and my big jug of pepper spray and karate workouts are fine. All our work is daytime now, and we rarely have to go into the bad sections of town any more. Besides, things have changed, and now the bad guys just start shooting with no reason, provocation, or warning. Best thing is tactical retreat. Steve |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Oct 1, 10:11*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in messagenews:eve8c5drri3bfgvjrpk1re4201852qi3d0@4ax .com... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 30, 8:40 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. :) Tom, that's fine if you have the pepper. And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, *If I were you, *I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". *:) Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. *He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. For a piece of **** manufactured gun you can drag through the mud and then fire two magazines of ammo, yes, it is one fine weapon. *Looks like the damn things will last until you fire the bore smooth, and then just keep firing. About as simple as a Model A Ford. Steve- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And it would be hard to shoot them wtill the bore was smooth, because even with corrosiive ammo, the bore lineing is chrome plated. At least it is on my SKS's |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:11:20 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 30, 8:40 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. :) Tom, that's fine if you have the pepper. And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, If I were you, I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". :) Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. For a piece of **** manufactured gun you can drag through the mud and then fire two magazines of ammo, yes, it is one fine weapon. Looks like the damn things will last until you fire the bore smooth, and then just keep firing. About as simple as a Model A Ford. A few years ago, there was a survey about the top ten weapons that changed modern warfare. For some reason, the RPG and AK-47 were placed 10th and 3rd respectively. I would argue that you could make the case for either the RPG or AK-47 as number one - tied even. I disagree with you on one point - even in local manufacturer mode where the firing mechanism, chamber and barrels are supplied and the stocks are made out of local materials they are a quality weapon for a guerilla unit or assault force. They maintain reasonable accuracy even when abused. I do agree with you on it's ability to hold up under abuse - you can fire the damned things until the barrel is smooth as glass and it still shoots reasonably straight over short distances. It's a combination of relaxed machining standards and the metal alloys they use to build the business ends. It's not so much how they are made as how they are used and in that sense, it's an outstanding weapon. The one who is owned by somebody who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) is Russian in origin built in '66 and part of Russian military aid to the NVA. A war souvenir and shipped back to the states in pieces. Of course I can't "directly" verify any of that - wink wink - nudge nudge. :) |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 1, 10:11*am, "SteveB" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in messagenews:eve8c5drri3bfgvjrpk1re4201852qi3d0@4ax .com... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 30, 8:40 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. :) Tom, that's fine if you have the pepper. And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, *If I were you, *I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". *:) Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. *He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. For a piece of **** manufactured gun you can drag through the mud and then fire two magazines of ammo, yes, it is one fine weapon. *Looks like the damn things will last until you fire the bore smooth, and then just keep firing. About as simple as a Model A Ford. Steve- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And it would be hard to shoot them wtill the bore was smooth, because even with corrosiive ammo, the bore lineing is chrome plated. At least it is on my SKS's Out of curiosity: If you had your druthers, which would you choose - an AK-47 or a M4? |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On 10/1/09 12:02 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:11:20 -0600, wrote: "Tom Francis - wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 30, 8:40 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. :) Tom, that's fine if you have the pepper. And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, If I were you, I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". :) Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. For a piece of **** manufactured gun you can drag through the mud and then fire two magazines of ammo, yes, it is one fine weapon. Looks like the damn things will last until you fire the bore smooth, and then just keep firing. About as simple as a Model A Ford. A few years ago, there was a survey about the top ten weapons that changed modern warfare. For some reason, the RPG and AK-47 were placed 10th and 3rd respectively. I would argue that you could make the case for either the RPG or AK-47 as number one - tied even. I disagree with you on one point - even in local manufacturer mode where the firing mechanism, chamber and barrels are supplied and the stocks are made out of local materials they are a quality weapon for a guerilla unit or assault force. They maintain reasonable accuracy even when abused. I do agree with you on it's ability to hold up under abuse - you can fire the damned things until the barrel is smooth as glass and it still shoots reasonably straight over short distances. It's a combination of relaxed machining standards and the metal alloys they use to build the business ends. It's not so much how they are made as how they are used and in that sense, it's an outstanding weapon. The one who is owned by somebody who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) is Russian in origin built in '66 and part of Russian military aid to the NVA. A war souvenir and shipped back to the states in pieces. Of course I can't "directly" verify any of that - wink wink - nudge nudge. :) What's the big deal? If you can fog a mirror and are sans felony/domestic violence convictions, you can have a Class III firearm transferred to you. It costs $200 for the transfer. At least a third of the guys I shoot with out in Virginia have full-auto firearms legally in their possession. Hell, just learn how to bump that Desert Eagle and you, too, can enjoy the great fun of a really rapid fire pistol. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:06:54 -0400, Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "SteveB" wrote in message ... Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Ultimately, the pen *is* mightier than the sword. You're killing me. Use her. Test your filter with her. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "SteveB" wrote in message ... Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Ultimately, the pen *is* mightier than the sword. You're killing me. Swords into plowshares? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:06:54 -0400, Jim wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "SteveB" wrote in message ... Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Ultimately, the pen *is* mightier than the sword. You're killing me. Use her. Test your filter with her. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. Yup... hiding your head in the sand always works! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:40:13 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. :) Pepper in one hand, taser in the other, .44 magnum in back pocket. Sounds good to me. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Oct 1, 7:18*am, H the K wrote:
An absolutely idiotic choice for a home defense weapon. Crikey, it must weigh four pounds. It's big, bulky, and fires a round that will likely go right through a house wall, through a neighbor's house wall, and kill that neighbor's cocker spaniel. Who's talking about "home defense", Harry? Maybe I'm wrong, but i thought we were talking about shooting a pistol in general. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On 10/1/09 7:23 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 1, 7:18 am, H the wrote: An absolutely idiotic choice for a home defense weapon. Crikey, it must weigh four pounds. It's big, bulky, and fires a round that will likely go right through a house wall, through a neighbor's house wall, and kill that neighbor's cocker spaniel. Who's talking about "home defense", Harry? Maybe I'm wrong, but i thought we were talking about shooting a pistol in general. I believe I previously stated having a pistol like that is like have a "cigarette-type penis boat," and that the same sort of guys would have one, the other, or both. I have no idea what purpose a pistol like that serves. I guess some guys hunt with it. But it's too big and clumsy to use as an "oh-my-god-that grizzly-is-charging" gun. It's certainly not a pistol for defense or offense. I looked it up. It *does* weigh about four pounds. Just what I'd want for offhand shooting. :) To each his/her own. There's no accounting for taste, right? My taste gravitates towards finesse - old Porsches, Jags, Healeys, not Corvettes, Hemis, or hot-rod Lincolns. :) -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:23:13 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 1, 7:18*am, H the K wrote: An absolutely idiotic choice for a home defense weapon. Crikey, it must weigh four pounds. It's big, bulky, and fires a round that will likely go right through a house wall, through a neighbor's house wall, and kill that neighbor's cocker spaniel. Who's talking about "home defense", Harry? Maybe I'm wrong, but i thought we were talking about shooting a pistol in general. Some folks just seem to stay worried about being attacked. All y'all's talking about pistols makes me want to go buy one. I wonder what it is about some of us and guns. I personally don't think it's possible to have too many. They're fun to shoot, fun to clean, fun to just mess with, and nothing smells better than gun oil. Of course, my wife doesn't think it's cool for me to dip the swabs and then shove one in each nostril. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Oct 1, 6:43*pm, JohnH wrote:
Of course, my wife doesn't think it's cool for me to dip the swabs and then shove one in each nostril. -- John H Er, John..... Are you sure you want a gun? ?:^ l |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:43:32 -0400, JohnH
wrote: They're fun to shoot, fun to clean, fun to just mess with, and nothing smells better than gun oil. Of course, my wife doesn't think it's cool for me to dip the swabs and then shove one in each nostril. Whose nostrils exactly? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:43:32 -0400, JohnH
wrote: On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:23:13 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 1, 7:18*am, H the K wrote: An absolutely idiotic choice for a home defense weapon. Crikey, it must weigh four pounds. It's big, bulky, and fires a round that will likely go right through a house wall, through a neighbor's house wall, and kill that neighbor's cocker spaniel. Who's talking about "home defense", Harry? Maybe I'm wrong, but i thought we were talking about shooting a pistol in general. Some folks just seem to stay worried about being attacked. All y'all's talking about pistols makes me want to go buy one. I wonder what it is about some of us and guns. I personally don't think it's possible to have too many. They're fun to shoot, fun to clean, fun to just mess with, and nothing smells better than gun oil. Of course, my wife doesn't think it's cool for me to dip the swabs and then shove one in each nostril. Dude - that's so true. Wives get all uppity just because you leave your black powder rifle barrel in the tub to soak after a long session at the target range. Seriously - where else are you supposed to do that? Just because it leaves a ring around the tub - damn... :) |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
Hey John, Thats pretty much the way I would sum it up. as you can see I
can always make room in the safe, barely. Luckily I'm able to load all my own rounds, So its actually cheaper to shoot than Golf, but I do shoot golf balls on occasion. :) UD * http://s391.photobucket.com/albums/oo353/captuglydan/ |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:28:13 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:43:32 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:23:13 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 1, 7:18*am, H the K wrote: An absolutely idiotic choice for a home defense weapon. Crikey, it must weigh four pounds. It's big, bulky, and fires a round that will likely go right through a house wall, through a neighbor's house wall, and kill that neighbor's cocker spaniel. Who's talking about "home defense", Harry? Maybe I'm wrong, but i thought we were talking about shooting a pistol in general. Some folks just seem to stay worried about being attacked. All y'all's talking about pistols makes me want to go buy one. I wonder what it is about some of us and guns. I personally don't think it's possible to have too many. They're fun to shoot, fun to clean, fun to just mess with, and nothing smells better than gun oil. Of course, my wife doesn't think it's cool for me to dip the swabs and then shove one in each nostril. Dude - that's so true. Wives get all uppity just because you leave your black powder rifle barrel in the tub to soak after a long session at the target range. Seriously - where else are you supposed to do that? Just because it leaves a ring around the tub - damn... :) Those are the same type female that doesn't understand that freezers are for contracting parts and ovens are for expanding them. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:04:51 -0700, (UglyDan®©™)
wrote: Hey John, Thats pretty much the way I would sum it up. as you can see I can always make room in the safe, barely. Luckily I'm able to load all my own rounds, So its actually cheaper to shoot than Golf, but I do shoot golf balls on occasion. :) UD * http://s391.photobucket.com/albums/oo353/captuglydan/ YES! That's what I'm talkin' about. I don't have a semi-auto pistol. Now you've got me drooling. I'll have to check on the next Virginia gun show in the area. You've never seen so many guns in one place. Speaking of propitious. Would you look at this: http://thenationsgunshow.com/ Now I've got something to do tomorrow that won't cost me a fortune. Hell, I may just go ahead and get a concealed carry permit. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:41:24 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 1, 6:43*pm, JohnH wrote: Of course, my wife doesn't think it's cool for me to dip the swabs and then shove one in each nostril. -- John H Er, John..... Are you sure you want a gun? ?:^ l Er, Tim, you snipped the best parts! Do you clean your guns without an oil laden swab stuck up your nose? Whimp. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Someday, I might get brave enough to try out my son's Desert Eagle. Maybe. :) I had the opportunity to shoot a .50 Desert Eagle. Back then it was $1.25 per pull. It was fun but not something I'd care to own. Which one does he have? |
Uh-oh...process server on the way to justhate's...
H the K wrote:
On 10/1/09 12:02 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:11:20 -0600, wrote: "Tom Francis - wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 30, 8:40 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:25:34 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:00 -0600, wrote: Actually Harry, I'd feel very fortunate to use a pisol against a human assailant. If a person does not possess the confidence to face an opponent empty handed, that person needs training. There are many ways to kill or disable an opponent bare handed. Those who must rely on a weapon just demonstrate their own inadequacy, although, it DOES make it a hell of a lot easier. And you don't have to get your hands dirty or your hair messed up. Steve Karate is great, unless the other guy has a .44 magnum pointed at your head. Black pepper. I had a self defense guru tell me one time that for close in mugging, nothing beats a palm full of black pepper in the face. When you think about it, makes perfect sense. I also like the small personal Tasers. Those look like a fairly decent issue to use - non-lethal and you can deal out some punishment without getting too close. :) Tom, that's fine if you have the pepper. And Tom, if the .44 gave you that much grief, If I were you, I'd seriously consider leaving the Desert Eagle alone. seriously. I did qualify that with a "maybe". :) Somebody that I know who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) has an AK that, um..."works" if you get my drift. He had it up at the Turkey Shoot the other day - man, it still shoots sweet as can be. That's one fine weapon. For a piece of **** manufactured gun you can drag through the mud and then fire two magazines of ammo, yes, it is one fine weapon. Looks like the damn things will last until you fire the bore smooth, and then just keep firing. About as simple as a Model A Ford. A few years ago, there was a survey about the top ten weapons that changed modern warfare. For some reason, the RPG and AK-47 were placed 10th and 3rd respectively. I would argue that you could make the case for either the RPG or AK-47 as number one - tied even. I disagree with you on one point - even in local manufacturer mode where the firing mechanism, chamber and barrels are supplied and the stocks are made out of local materials they are a quality weapon for a guerilla unit or assault force. They maintain reasonable accuracy even when abused. I do agree with you on it's ability to hold up under abuse - you can fire the damned things until the barrel is smooth as glass and it still shoots reasonably straight over short distances. It's a combination of relaxed machining standards and the metal alloys they use to build the business ends. It's not so much how they are made as how they are used and in that sense, it's an outstanding weapon. The one who is owned by somebody who knows somebody that knows somebody who knows somebody else (wink wink - nudge nudge) is Russian in origin built in '66 and part of Russian military aid to the NVA. A war souvenir and shipped back to the states in pieces. Of course I can't "directly" verify any of that - wink wink - nudge nudge. :) What's the big deal? If you can fog a mirror and are sans felony/domestic violence convictions, you can have a Class III firearm transferred to you. It costs $200 for the transfer. At least a third of the guys I shoot with out in Virginia have full-auto firearms legally in their possession. Hell, just learn how to bump that Desert Eagle and you, too, can enjoy the great fun of a really rapid fire pistol. It's sort of the Cigarette boat of pistols, used, no doubt, by the same sort of guys. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com