On Oct 9, 3:51*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:01:56 -0700 (PDT), Lefty
wrote:



Uhm, if you like dogs don't bring yours into the conversation. *Gummer
proudly posted about hanging his to death on a choker chain...

Ironic, since he's claiming to be a Buddhist. Buddhists believe in
respect for all forms of life and total non-violence.
Bat**** crazy doesn't even begin to describe this guy.

So Buddhists never kill?

Strawman. They're not ~supposed~ to kill, stupid. Of course they do,
because mostly they're hypocrites like you.

I see you know nothing of the East.

Knowing nothing is your area, Gunner. I bow to your greater
experience.

Let alone the Rensi Buddhists.

Please provide links to the existence of such a sect. Perhaps you mean
Ritsu? Put up or shut up, coward. Show me a school of Buddhism that is
theistic and sanctions murder or admit your hypocrisy.

But then..you continue to prove your stupidity to one and all.

Says the theistic, murderous "Buddhist" who brags of torturing
animals. Do you brag about ****ing your mother and claim to be a
virgin, too?

I hope your death is slow.

That scared of being shown for the ignoramus you are, eh? Good.

Gunner

GUNNER'S PRAYER:
"God grant me the serenity to accept the people
that don't need to get shot, the courage to shoot
the people that need shooting and the wisdom to know the difference.
And if need be, the skill to get it done before I have to reload."

0

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Lefty
wrote:

But then..you continue to prove your stupidity to one and all.

Says the theistic, murderous "Buddhist" who brags of torturing
animals


Torturing animals? Blink blink...so know we all know what depths of
lies and buffoonery you will stoop.

And its lower than sewer bottom deep.

Its commonly known that I do animal rescue and yet you somehow claim Ive
bragged about "animal torture"

Your lies condemn you to the buffoon bin.

Once someone like you starts lying..the only way you will stop, is
meeting death.

plink

Gunner


"Lenin called them "useful idiots," those people living in
liberal democracies who by giving moral and material support
to a totalitarian ideology in effect were braiding the rope that
would hang them. Why people who enjoyed freedom and prosperity worked
passionately to destroy both is a fascinating question, one still with us
today. Now the useful idiots can be found in the chorus of appeasement,
reflexive anti-Americanism, and sentimental idealism trying to inhibit
the necessary responses to another freedom-hating ideology, radical Islam"

Bruce C. Thornton, a professor of Classics at American University of Cal State Fresno

On Oct 11, 6:11*pm, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Lefty

wrote:
But then..you continue to prove your stupidity to one and all.

Says the theistic, murderous "Buddhist" who brags of torturing
animals

Torturing animals? *Blink blink...so know we all know what depths of
lies and buffoonery you will stoop.

Did you, or did you not, cause your dog to strangle on a choke chain
through your negligent use of this cruel device? A simple yes or no
will do.

And its lower than sewer bottom deep.

Yes or no?

Its commonly known that I do animal rescue and yet you somehow claim Ive
bragged about "animal torture"

Anyone can claim anything on usenet, blowhard. You may have said you
do animal rescue for all I know, but you can't prove ****. I do know
you have also said you tortured and killed your dog by punishing him
with a choke chain, unless this is not your quote;

"Opie, my Aussie, my daily dog...went to work with me, went everywhere
with me..is shown on my various webpages, started roaming. Yesterday I
caught him a block away. He knew he had screwed up, so he ran for home
as soon as he saw me looking for him.

So I put him on a chain and went to bed

This morning I went out to bring him in, and he had managed to
strangle himself by trying to get between the fence and a support
structure, hooking the chain snap on the fence fabric, something no
other dog had ever tried to do

He evidently strangled to death slowly sometime in the night. The
choker collar so tight, he couldnt make a sound. In an almost sitting
upright position. It couldnt have been an easy death. And I was 20
feet away, and on the other side of a screen door, apparently when it
happened."

You said this? Choke chains are ~torture~ devices and leaving a dog
who roams tied to one on all night is negligent beyond belief, which
is not much different from deliberate killing.

Your lies condemn you to the buffoon bin.

Yes or no, Gunner? If this is confirmed not to be your quote, I will
apologize. If it is, you owe me an apology for claiming I lied. But of
course, you will not do so, because you're an amoral coward,

Once someone like you starts lying..the only way you will stop, is
meeting death.

Another limp threat. That must mean you're guilty as sin and enraged
about being exposed. Dog killers are no better than child killers.

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT), Lefty
wrote:


"Opie, my Aussie, my daily dog...went to work with me, went everywhere
with me..is shown on my various webpages, started roaming. Yesterday I
caught him a block away. He knew he had screwed up, so he ran for home
as soon as he saw me looking for him.

So I put him on a chain and went to bed

This morning I went out to bring him in, and he had managed to
strangle himself by trying to get between the fence and a support
structure, hooking the chain snap on the fence fabric, something no
other dog had ever tried to do

He evidently strangled to death slowly sometime in the night. The
choker collar so tight, he couldnt make a sound. In an almost sitting
upright position. It couldnt have been an easy death. And I was 20
feet away, and on the other side of a screen door, apparently when it
happened."

You said this? Choke chains are ~torture~ devices and leaving a dog
who roams tied to one on all night is negligent beyond belief, which
is not much different from deliberate killing.

Your lies condemn you to the buffoon bin.

Yes or no, Gunner? If this is confirmed not to be your quote, I will
apologize. If it is, you owe me an apology for claiming I lied. But of
course, you will not do so, because you're an amoral coward,

Once someone like you starts lying..the only way you will stop, is
meeting death.

Another limp threat. That must mean you're guilty as sin and enraged
about being exposed. Dog killers are no better than child killers.

=

Anyone that is involved with rescuing dogs knows better than to chain
a dog outside overnight. In fact, if he belongs to a rescue group,
and they knew this, they would see to it that he never "rescued" one
again.

Period.

BK

On Oct 14, 5:24*pm, Bobby Knight wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT), Lefty



wrote:
"Opie, my Aussie, my daily dog...went to work with me, went everywhere
with me..is shown on my various webpages, started roaming. Yesterday I
caught him a block away. He knew he had screwed up, so he ran for home
as soon as he saw me looking for him.

So I put him on a chain and went to bed

This morning I went out to bring him in, and he had managed to
strangle *himself by trying to get between the fence and a support
structure, hooking the chain snap on the fence fabric, something no
other dog had ever tried to do

He evidently strangled to death slowly sometime in the night. The
choker collar so tight, he couldnt make a sound. In an almost sitting
upright position. It couldnt have been an easy death. *And I was 20
feet away, and on the other side of a screen door, apparently when it
happened."

You said this? Choke chains are ~torture~ devices and leaving a dog
who roams tied to one on all night is negligent beyond belief, which
is not much different from deliberate killing.

Your lies condemn you to the buffoon bin.

Yes or no, Gunner? If this is confirmed not to be your quote, I will
apologize. If it is, you owe me an apology for claiming I lied. But of
course, you will not do so, because you're an amoral coward,

Once someone like you starts lying..the only way you will stop, is
meeting death.

Another limp threat. That must mean you're guilty as sin and enraged
about being exposed. Dog killers are no better than child killers.

=

Anyone that is involved with rescuing dogs knows better than to chain
a dog outside overnight. *In fact, if he belongs to a rescue group,
and they knew this, *they would see to it that he never "rescued" one
again.

Period.

*BK

Too bad his dog wasn't rescued from ~him~.

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT), Lefty
wrote:

Another limp threat. That must mean you're guilty as sin and enraged
about being exposed. Dog killers are no better than child killers.

Are they better than cow killers? If so, why?

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

On Oct 14, 6:18*pm, Howard Brazee wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT), Lefty

wrote:
Another limp threat. That must mean you're guilty as sin and enraged
about being exposed. Dog killers are no better than child killers.

Are they better than cow killers? * *If so, why?

It depends on why the animal was killed. Killing any animal for food,
IMO, is vastly different from doing so out of the enjoyment of
cruelty, which I believe the poster did. He knew tying the dog to a
choke chain overnight would result in, at the very least, significant
pain. No dog owner, not even Gunner, is so clueless as to not realize
that choke chains constrain the breathing and crush the throat. Hell,
that's why people use them, as a barbaric form of punishment.