| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Does any of this sound familiar?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp
Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
On Sep 23, 7:31*am, Toots Sweet wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. you're a liar and a boor. go away |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:36:23 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Sep 23, 7:31*am, Toots Sweet wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. you're a liar and a boor. go away "I believe the memo was title Osama bin Laden determined to strike US" If Obama is incompetent, what does that say for the Republicans? |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:35:39 -0700, jps wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:36:23 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 23, 7:31*am, Toots Sweet wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. you're a liar and a boor. go away "I believe the memo was title Osama bin Laden determined to strike US" If Obama is incompetent, what does that say for the Republicans? The first part of your question is not in doubt, as you stated. It says that most Republicans voted for McCain. -- John H |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:50:39 -0400, JohnH
wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:35:39 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:36:23 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 23, 7:31*am, Toots Sweet wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. you're a liar and a boor. go away "I believe the memo was title Osama bin Laden determined to strike US" If Obama is incompetent, what does that say for the Republicans? The first part of your question is not in doubt, as you stated. It says that most Republicans voted for McCain. Apart from your hero, Glenn Beck. I was speaking about the Republican administration, numb nuts. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:05:05 -0700, jps wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:50:39 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:35:39 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:36:23 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 23, 7:31*am, Toots Sweet wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. you're a liar and a boor. go away "I believe the memo was title Osama bin Laden determined to strike US" If Obama is incompetent, what does that say for the Republicans? The first part of your question is not in doubt, as you stated. It says that most Republicans voted for McCain. Apart from your hero, Glenn Beck. I was speaking about the Republican administration, numb nuts. The administration is Democrat, ......apparently as incompetent as 'bama. -- John H |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Toots Sweet
wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. Obviously the New York Times is a racist publication, That's the only rationale for this kind of anti-'bama story. Didn't Obama declare this a 'war of necessity'? How can he possibly be rethinking our goal here. We *must* win. -- John H |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
On Sep 23, 11:37 am, JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Toots Sweet wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. Obviously the New York Times is a racist publication, That's the only rationale for this kind of anti-'bama story. Didn't Obama declare this a 'war of necessity'? How can he possibly be rethinking our goal here. We *must* win. -- uh...hey genius...he's rethinking it precisely BECAUSE it's important to win. unlike bush who just thought in terms of enriching the wealthy, obama has our security interests in mind. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any of this sound familiar?
"Toots Sweet" wrote in message
... http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/wo...y.html?_r=1&hp Incompetance doesn't even begin to describe this administration. So, what you're saying is that once you've decided on a plan, you stick to it no matter what? Someone did that a few years ago I believe, and now Obama is trying to clean up the mess. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sound familiar? | General | |||
| Does this guy look familiar? | General | |||
| Does this guy look familiar? | General | |||
| Do these words sound familiar? | General | |||
| sound familiar ? | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
