|
Who's in YOUR wallet!
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. You need to readjust your gaydar... Yeah, Hannity's a conservative, so there's NO WAY..... The question is weather he is more gay than Obermann.. Come on, really, try to keep up and not just use every post to be a Harry... Quite the opposite, I'm trying to get you to see that you are acting like an oppositeHarry. Conservative good, liberal bad. Of COURSE you'd say Hannity was less gay than Olberman. |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
"JustWait" wrote in message ... In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. You need to readjust your gaydar... Yeah, Hannity's a conservative, so there's NO WAY..... The question is weather he is more gay than Obermann.. Come on, really, try to keep up and not just use every post to be a Harry... Quite the opposite, I'm trying to get you to see that you are acting like an oppositeHarry. Conservative good, liberal bad. Of COURSE you'd say Hannity was less gay than Olberman. Come on, Boy George is less gay than Obermann... geeze.. -- Wafa free since 2009 and compared to barney? |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Pgm_wD9AK3O680 have a good evening... Hmmm. Overturning McCain-Feingold sounds like legislating from the bench. My, my. How times change. It's interesting to hear McCain warn the supremes that there is their world, and a real world. McCain-Feingold never should have passed. While flipping channels I noticed yesterday that immediately after Obama's speech both CNN and Fox had anti-Obama-health-care reform ads running. Didn't watch them after I got their drift, which took about 3 seconds. Freedom of speeh and freedom of association is a wonderful thing isn't it. But to answer your question: EVERYBODY!! --Vic |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Sep 10, 1:25*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...AeFTeeZgHFLy1E... have a good evening... I don't know much about the law, so maybe that's the problem, but I don't understand the issue with allowing (or not allowing) corporations to contribute to campaigns. I guess the courts consider them the same as individuals, but that just seems odd and wrong-headed to me. -- Nom=de=Plume corporations aren't people and aren't mentioned in the constitution. they are a legal fiction. their money is real and it distorts the political process |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
"wf3h" wrote in message
... On Sep 10, 1:25 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...AeFTeeZgHFLy1E... have a good evening... I don't know much about the law, so maybe that's the problem, but I don't understand the issue with allowing (or not allowing) corporations to contribute to campaigns. I guess the courts consider them the same as individuals, but that just seems odd and wrong-headed to me. -- Nom=de=Plume corporations aren't people and aren't mentioned in the constitution. they are a legal fiction. their money is real and it distorts the political process I thought I read somewhere about a Supreme Court ruling that basically allows corps to be treated like individuals, as far as "First Amendment" rights go. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote:
McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
BAR wrote:
thunder wrote: On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. Moron. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:32:16 -0400, BAR wrote:
thunder wrote: On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. http://www.ctj.org/html/corp0402.htm |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com