|
Who's in YOUR wallet!
|
Who's in YOUR wallet!
"Tim" wrote in message
... http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Pgm_wD9AK3O680 have a good evening... I don't know much about the law, so maybe that's the problem, but I don't understand the issue with allowing (or not allowing) corporations to contribute to campaigns. I guess the courts consider them the same as individuals, but that just seems odd and wrong-headed to me. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Pgm_wD9AK3O680 have a good evening... Hmmm. Overturning McCain-Feingold sounds like legislating from the bench. My, my. How times change. It's interesting to hear McCain warn the supremes that there is their world, and a real world. While flipping channels I noticed yesterday that immediately after Obama's speech both CNN and Fox had anti-Obama-health-care reform ads running. Didn't watch them after I got their drift, which took about 3 seconds. But to answer your question: EVERYBODY!! --Vic |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Pgm_wD9AK3O680 have a good evening... Hmmm. Overturning McCain-Feingold sounds like legislating from the bench. My, my. How times change. It's interesting to hear McCain warn the supremes that there is their world, and a real world. While flipping channels I noticed yesterday that immediately after Obama's speech both CNN and Fox had anti-Obama-health-care reform ads running. Didn't watch them after I got their drift, which took about 3 seconds. But to answer your question: EVERYBODY!! --Vic Yeah, and yesterday when the Republicans had a news conference on Health Care I flipped though the channels and CNN and NBC didn't even run clips... Fox played the conference. Then of course later I went to MSNBC/GE/DNC and Obermann was having an anti republican, anti teabagger circle jerk with two dem pundits... Now that must have been interesting...a GOP news conference on health care. What was discussed? 50 new ways to empty your wallets to your health insurer? -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:31:14 -0400, JustWait
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Pgm_wD9AK3O680 have a good evening... Hmmm. Overturning McCain-Feingold sounds like legislating from the bench. My, my. How times change. It's interesting to hear McCain warn the supremes that there is their world, and a real world. While flipping channels I noticed yesterday that immediately after Obama's speech both CNN and Fox had anti-Obama-health-care reform ads running. Didn't watch them after I got their drift, which took about 3 seconds. But to answer your question: EVERYBODY!! --Vic Yeah, and yesterday when the Republicans had a news conference on Health Care I flipped though the channels and CNN and NBC didn't even run clips... Fox played the conference. Saw part of that on C-Span. That's all the result of a petition drive by a radio guy. Republicans are out of the picture really. But not radio and TV talking heads. The Dems are running the Presidential/Congressional show. Then of course later I went to MSNBC/GE/DNC and Obermann was having an anti republican, anti teabagger circle jerk with two dem pundits... Olbermann is an asshole like Hannity, only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. Gives him an edge over Hannity IMO. Both are millionaires with excellent health insurance. I don't see either as my role model. I like Joe DiMaggio. Best go to C-Span for some semblance of facts. --Vic |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
|
Who's in YOUR wallet!
Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:31:14 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Pgm_wD9AK3O680 have a good evening... Hmmm. Overturning McCain-Feingold sounds like legislating from the bench. My, my. How times change. It's interesting to hear McCain warn the supremes that there is their world, and a real world. While flipping channels I noticed yesterday that immediately after Obama's speech both CNN and Fox had anti-Obama-health-care reform ads running. Didn't watch them after I got their drift, which took about 3 seconds. But to answer your question: EVERYBODY!! --Vic Yeah, and yesterday when the Republicans had a news conference on Health Care I flipped though the channels and CNN and NBC didn't even run clips... Fox played the conference. Saw part of that on C-Span. That's all the result of a petition drive by a radio guy. Republicans are out of the picture really. But not radio and TV talking heads. The Dems are running the Presidential/Congressional show. Then of course later I went to MSNBC/GE/DNC and Obermann was having an anti republican, anti teabagger circle jerk with two dem pundits... Olbermann is an asshole like Hannity, only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. Gives him an edge over Hannity IMO. Both are millionaires with excellent health insurance. I don't see either as my role model. I like Joe DiMaggio. Best go to C-Span for some semblance of facts. --Vic I like keith, but my sweetheart is Rachel Maddow...she is incredibly smart and fast and well-read and asks the hard, hard questions of her guests without being annoying or offensive. Hannity is a lying asshole. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. You need to readjust your gaydar... Yeah, Hannity's a conservative, so there's NO WAY..... |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. You need to readjust your gaydar... Yeah, Hannity's a conservative, so there's NO WAY..... The question is weather he is more gay than Obermann.. Come on, really, try to keep up and not just use every post to be a Harry... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. You need to readjust your gaydar... Yeah, Hannity's a conservative, so there's NO WAY..... The question is weather he is more gay than Obermann.. Come on, really, try to keep up and not just use every post to be a Harry... Quite the opposite, I'm trying to get you to see that you are acting like an oppositeHarry. Conservative good, liberal bad. Of COURSE you'd say Hannity was less gay than Olberman. |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. You need to readjust your gaydar... Yeah, Hannity's a conservative, so there's NO WAY..... The question is weather he is more gay than Obermann.. Come on, really, try to keep up and not just use every post to be a Harry... Quite the opposite, I'm trying to get you to see that you are acting like an oppositeHarry. Conservative good, liberal bad. Of COURSE you'd say Hannity was less gay than Olberman. Come on, Boy George is less gay than Obermann... geeze.. -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
"JustWait" wrote in message ... In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... only real difference is he's twice as smart and half as gay. You need to readjust your gaydar... Yeah, Hannity's a conservative, so there's NO WAY..... The question is weather he is more gay than Obermann.. Come on, really, try to keep up and not just use every post to be a Harry... Quite the opposite, I'm trying to get you to see that you are acting like an oppositeHarry. Conservative good, liberal bad. Of COURSE you'd say Hannity was less gay than Olberman. Come on, Boy George is less gay than Obermann... geeze.. -- Wafa free since 2009 and compared to barney? |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:05:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Pgm_wD9AK3O680 have a good evening... Hmmm. Overturning McCain-Feingold sounds like legislating from the bench. My, my. How times change. It's interesting to hear McCain warn the supremes that there is their world, and a real world. McCain-Feingold never should have passed. While flipping channels I noticed yesterday that immediately after Obama's speech both CNN and Fox had anti-Obama-health-care reform ads running. Didn't watch them after I got their drift, which took about 3 seconds. Freedom of speeh and freedom of association is a wonderful thing isn't it. But to answer your question: EVERYBODY!! --Vic |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Sep 10, 1:25*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...AeFTeeZgHFLy1E... have a good evening... I don't know much about the law, so maybe that's the problem, but I don't understand the issue with allowing (or not allowing) corporations to contribute to campaigns. I guess the courts consider them the same as individuals, but that just seems odd and wrong-headed to me. -- Nom=de=Plume corporations aren't people and aren't mentioned in the constitution. they are a legal fiction. their money is real and it distorts the political process |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
"wf3h" wrote in message
... On Sep 10, 1:25 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...AeFTeeZgHFLy1E... have a good evening... I don't know much about the law, so maybe that's the problem, but I don't understand the issue with allowing (or not allowing) corporations to contribute to campaigns. I guess the courts consider them the same as individuals, but that just seems odd and wrong-headed to me. -- Nom=de=Plume corporations aren't people and aren't mentioned in the constitution. they are a legal fiction. their money is real and it distorts the political process I thought I read somewhere about a Supreme Court ruling that basically allows corps to be treated like individuals, as far as "First Amendment" rights go. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote:
McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
BAR wrote:
thunder wrote: On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. Moron. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:32:16 -0400, BAR wrote:
thunder wrote: On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. http://www.ctj.org/html/corp0402.htm |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
thunder wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:32:16 -0400, BAR wrote: thunder wrote: On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. http://www.ctj.org/html/corp0402.htm Do you call those individuals who pay now federal taxes recipients of federal personal welfare? Should they be pushed off the voter rolls? |
Who's in YOUR wallet!
thunder wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:32:16 -0400, BAR wrote: thunder wrote: On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:29:36 -0400, BAR wrote: McCain-Feingold never should have passed. Sure, why try to rein in corporate welfare? It only costs us @ $150 billion a year. It's all about paying taxes. If you pay taxes you get to play. If you don't pay taxes then shut up. http://www.ctj.org/html/corp0402.htm That's old news - almost 10 years old. Taxes not paid by Obama's cabinet is current news. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com