In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?
He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?

He is hard to listen to when he doesn't have the prompter, ten times
worse than Bush but being a Dem, nobody dares talk about it, don't want
to be called a racist.


Did you know that since the time of George Washington, all presidents
have giving speeches using WRITTEN material? Some use teleprompters,
some paper. Please tell me what is the difference? Did you know that
Reagan used a teleprompter a LOT? Wait, I know the difference. It's just
another way to say something negative about a liberal.

Yeah, did you make those same excuses when Bush missed one word in a
speech and the left went nuts? Obama can't even form a sentence without
his prompter, like, uh, er, like, like, uh, uh........

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?
He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?
He is hard to listen to when he doesn't have the prompter, ten times
worse than Bush but being a Dem, nobody dares talk about it, don't want
to be called a racist.

Did you know that since the time of George Washington, all presidents
have giving speeches using WRITTEN material? Some use teleprompters,
some paper. Please tell me what is the difference? Did you know that
Reagan used a teleprompter a LOT? Wait, I know the difference. It's just
another way to say something negative about a liberal.

Yeah, did you make those same excuses when Bush missed one word in a
speech and the left went nuts? Obama can't even form a sentence without
his prompter, like, uh, er, like, like, uh, uh........


No, because no one around me whined about him using his teleprompter.
Most people know the presidents use either a teleprompter or paper. It
wasn't until Obama came on the scene that suddenly it's like committing
hatchet murder to use one, even though it's commonplace.

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?
He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?
He is hard to listen to when he doesn't have the prompter, ten times
worse than Bush but being a Dem, nobody dares talk about it, don't want
to be called a racist.

Did you know that since the time of George Washington, all presidents
have giving speeches using WRITTEN material? Some use teleprompters,
some paper. Please tell me what is the difference? Did you know that
Reagan used a teleprompter a LOT? Wait, I know the difference. It's just
another way to say something negative about a liberal.

Yeah, did you make those same excuses when Bush missed one word in a
speech and the left went nuts? Obama can't even form a sentence without
his prompter, like, uh, er, like, like, uh, uh........


No, because no one around me whined about him using his teleprompter.
Most people know the presidents use either a teleprompter or paper. It
wasn't until Obama came on the scene that suddenly it's like committing
hatchet murder to use one, even though it's commonplace.

Oh for God's sake... Bush was slammed for 8 years with jokes about the
way he spoke. Pictures of him looking like a monkey, even books written
and we can't note that Obama is just as bad, if now worse? Oh well, some
folks are just blinded by the specter of King Obama... Guess it's only
ok to point out faults if it's a white, male, republican, at least in
the media. Talk about racism and sexism... Yeah, the "tolerant" party!
snerk


--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?
He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?
He is hard to listen to when he doesn't have the prompter, ten times
worse than Bush but being a Dem, nobody dares talk about it, don't want
to be called a racist.

Did you know that since the time of George Washington, all presidents
have giving speeches using WRITTEN material? Some use teleprompters,
some paper. Please tell me what is the difference? Did you know that
Reagan used a teleprompter a LOT? Wait, I know the difference. It's just
another way to say something negative about a liberal.
Yeah, did you make those same excuses when Bush missed one word in a
speech and the left went nuts? Obama can't even form a sentence without
his prompter, like, uh, er, like, like, uh, uh........

No, because no one around me whined about him using his teleprompter.
Most people know the presidents use either a teleprompter or paper. It
wasn't until Obama came on the scene that suddenly it's like committing
hatchet murder to use one, even though it's commonplace.

Oh for God's sake... Bush was slammed for 8 years with jokes about the
way he spoke. Pictures of him looking like a monkey, even books written
and we can't note that Obama is just as bad, if now worse? Oh well, some
folks are just blinded by the specter of King Obama... Guess it's only
ok to point out faults if it's a white, male, republican, at least in
the media. Talk about racism and sexism... Yeah, the "tolerant" party!
snerk



You're completely missing the point. The point is about TELEPROMPTERS.
Your party has been constantly acting like he's the first and only
president who's ever used one. That's bull****.

On Sep 9, 11:20*am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?
He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?
He is hard to listen to when he doesn't have the prompter, ten times
worse than Bush but being a Dem, nobody dares talk about it, don't want
to be called a racist.

Did you know that since the time of George Washington, all presidents
have giving speeches using WRITTEN material? Some use teleprompters,
some paper. Please tell me what is the difference? Did you know that
Reagan used a teleprompter a LOT? Wait, I know the difference. It's just
another way to say something negative about a liberal.
Yeah, did you make those same excuses when Bush missed one word in a
speech and the left went nuts? Obama can't even form a sentence without
his prompter, like, uh, er, like, like, uh, uh........

No, because no one around me whined about him using his teleprompter.
Most people know the presidents use either a teleprompter or paper. It
wasn't until Obama came on the scene that suddenly it's like committing
hatchet murder to use one, even though it's commonplace.

Oh for God's sake... Bush was slammed for 8 years with jokes about the
way he spoke. Pictures of him looking like a monkey, even books written
and we can't note that Obama is just as bad, if now worse? Oh well, some
folks are just blinded by the specter of King Obama... Guess it's only
ok to point out faults if it's a white, male, republican, at least in
the media. Talk about racism and sexism... Yeah, the "tolerant" party!
snerk

You're completely missing the point. The point is about TELEPROMPTERS.
Your party has been constantly acting like he's the first and only
president who's ever used one. That's bull****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good Lord, guys.

It's lunch time.

Can't you take a break?

?;^ )

Tim wrote:
On Sep 9, 11:20 am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?
Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?
He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?
He is hard to listen to when he doesn't have the prompter, ten times
worse than Bush but being a Dem, nobody dares talk about it, don't want
to be called a racist.
Did you know that since the time of George Washington, all presidents
have giving speeches using WRITTEN material? Some use teleprompters,
some paper. Please tell me what is the difference? Did you know that
Reagan used a teleprompter a LOT? Wait, I know the difference. It's just
another way to say something negative about a liberal.
Yeah, did you make those same excuses when Bush missed one word in a
speech and the left went nuts? Obama can't even form a sentence without
his prompter, like, uh, er, like, like, uh, uh........
No, because no one around me whined about him using his teleprompter.
Most people know the presidents use either a teleprompter or paper. It
wasn't until Obama came on the scene that suddenly it's like committing
hatchet murder to use one, even though it's commonplace.
Oh for God's sake... Bush was slammed for 8 years with jokes about the
way he spoke. Pictures of him looking like a monkey, even books written
and we can't note that Obama is just as bad, if now worse? Oh well, some
folks are just blinded by the specter of King Obama... Guess it's only
ok to point out faults if it's a white, male, republican, at least in
the media. Talk about racism and sexism... Yeah, the "tolerant" party!
snerk
You're completely missing the point. The point is about TELEPROMPTERS.
Your party has been constantly acting like he's the first and only
president who's ever used one. That's bull****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good Lord, guys.

It's lunch time.

Can't you take a break?

?;^ )


I only see a bit of it, but seeing "the two stupes," loogy and justhate,
going at it is worth a couple of grins.



--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

BAR wrote:
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?

He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?


Just about all public speakers use a teleprompter, even the Republicans.
So what could your point possibly be?

Jim wrote:
BAR wrote:
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?

He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?


Just about all public speakers use a teleprompter, even the Republicans.
So what could your point possibly be?


A teleprompter is nothing more than a modernized version of a typed-out
speech, which most speakers used to use as a reference point. My guess
is the Repubs are upset about this because their boy Bush couldn't
deliver a speech in proper English even if he was using a teleprompter.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?
He's always using a Tele-Prompter, isn't Obama capable of public
speaking with a crutch?
He is hard to listen to when he doesn't have the prompter, ten times
worse than Bush but being a Dem, nobody dares talk about it, don't want
to be called a racist.

Did you know that since the time of George Washington, all presidents
have giving speeches using WRITTEN material? Some use teleprompters,
some paper. Please tell me what is the difference? Did you know that
Reagan used a teleprompter a LOT? Wait, I know the difference. It's just
another way to say something negative about a liberal.
Yeah, did you make those same excuses when Bush missed one word in a
speech and the left went nuts? Obama can't even form a sentence without
his prompter, like, uh, er, like, like, uh, uh........

No, because no one around me whined about him using his teleprompter.
Most people know the presidents use either a teleprompter or paper. It
wasn't until Obama came on the scene that suddenly it's like committing
hatchet murder to use one, even though it's commonplace.

Oh for God's sake... Bush was slammed for 8 years with jokes about the
way he spoke. Pictures of him looking like a monkey, even books written
and we can't note that Obama is just as bad, if now worse? Oh well, some
folks are just blinded by the specter of King Obama... Guess it's only
ok to point out faults if it's a white, male, republican, at least in
the media. Talk about racism and sexism... Yeah, the "tolerant" party!
snerk



You're completely missing the point. The point is about TELEPROMPTERS.
Your party has been constantly acting like he's the first and only
president who's ever used one. That's bull****.

Nope, we simply are pointing out that he can speak no better than Bush
without one, and typical to double standard, Bush was blasted for 8
years in the media, serious or otherwise, for his fumbling even though
it was nothing like Obama, or Carolyn Kennedy for that matter. But both
of them are off limits...

--
Wafa free since 2009

On Sep 8, 12:37*pm, NotNow wrote:
Jim wrote:
What will they find objectionable next?

Why do they hate our country so much that they wish for failure?

The silly thing is that from Reagan on, they ALL used teleprompters!

Sure they have. I see nothing wrong with using a teleprompter. That's
what they're made for.

That and singing kereoki...

So... which would you rather a President use it for?