|
I've figured it out
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 8, 1:34 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 8, 12:12 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: These idiots who don't want the President talking to their kids about school... They're afraid the kids are going to find out Obama is a completely reasonable guy who makes a lot of sense. It'll totally undercut the lies they've been telling their kids at home. Kids, being what they are, will question the indoctrination the parents give them on a daily basis. I'd bet some of these irrational right wingers are raising future Democrats. I now favor making kids watch the speech and forcing them to do the lesson plans. Teenagers being teens will rebel and become anti-Obama. What "lesson plans"? You don't get much news do you? http://www.ed.gov/teachers/how/lessons/7-12.pdf Psssst, that's the Department of Education's plan not something Obama wanted nor did he ask them to do. You know this how? Please cite your source... Click the friggin' link for crying out loud. Well, there was a waste of five minutes. Nowhere did it say they did it totally on their own. Funny how they are so smart they could set up a curriculum without knowing what the speech was to be about.. Yeah, no communication or preview of the speech, right... Pffffttt. That's because they didn't "set up a curriculum". Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo here is that "is, is" thing again. You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe, you say end of life panels, I say death panels, I say cirriculum, you say what, lesson plan??? Either way, the speech was probably changed a lot because of the backlash, good for that... Do you have any evidence that the speech was changed, or are you going with what the GOP has told you about this speech, which so far has proven to be all lies? Do you have any evidence that is wasn't, or are you..... An open mind and a bit of common sense goes a long way... Oh, by the way, please point out the known lies I have been told. And as usual, be specific please, I am eagerly awaiting your deflection and justification.... "Either way, the speech was probably changed a lot because of the backlash, good for that..." -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
I've figured it out
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 8, 1:34 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 8, 12:12 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: These idiots who don't want the President talking to their kids about school... They're afraid the kids are going to find out Obama is a completely reasonable guy who makes a lot of sense. It'll totally undercut the lies they've been telling their kids at home. Kids, being what they are, will question the indoctrination the parents give them on a daily basis. I'd bet some of these irrational right wingers are raising future Democrats. I now favor making kids watch the speech and forcing them to do the lesson plans. Teenagers being teens will rebel and become anti-Obama. What "lesson plans"? You don't get much news do you? http://www.ed.gov/teachers/how/lessons/7-12.pdf Psssst, that's the Department of Education's plan not something Obama wanted nor did he ask them to do. You know this how? Please cite your source... Click the friggin' link for crying out loud. Well, there was a waste of five minutes. Nowhere did it say they did it totally on their own. Funny how they are so smart they could set up a curriculum without knowing what the speech was to be about.. Yeah, no communication or preview of the speech, right... Pffffttt. That's because they didn't "set up a curriculum". Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo here is that "is, is" thing again. You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe, you say end of life panels, I say death panels, I say cirriculum, you say what, lesson plan??? Either way, the speech was probably changed a lot because of the backlash, good for that... Do you have any evidence that the speech was changed, or are you going with what the GOP has told you about this speech, which so far has proven to be all lies? Do you have any evidence that is wasn't, or are you..... An open mind and a bit of common sense goes a long way... Oh, by the way, please point out the known lies I have been told. And as usual, be specific please, I am eagerly awaiting your deflection and justification.... No problem! Here's this first, just a small part of the lies the right had said about Obama's speech to school children. Pay special heed to the right's darling Jim Greer: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09...y5285256.shtml Then simply go here and read the lies you've been told about healthca http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=9916 Happy reading! |
I've figured it out
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 8, 1:34 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 8, 12:12 pm, Jim wrote: jps wrote: These idiots who don't want the President talking to their kids about school... They're afraid the kids are going to find out Obama is a completely reasonable guy who makes a lot of sense. It'll totally undercut the lies they've been telling their kids at home. Kids, being what they are, will question the indoctrination the parents give them on a daily basis. I'd bet some of these irrational right wingers are raising future Democrats. I now favor making kids watch the speech and forcing them to do the lesson plans. Teenagers being teens will rebel and become anti-Obama. What "lesson plans"? You don't get much news do you? http://www.ed.gov/teachers/how/lessons/7-12.pdf Psssst, that's the Department of Education's plan not something Obama wanted nor did he ask them to do. You know this how? Please cite your source... Click the friggin' link for crying out loud. Well, there was a waste of five minutes. Nowhere did it say they did it totally on their own. Funny how they are so smart they could set up a curriculum without knowing what the speech was to be about.. Yeah, no communication or preview of the speech, right... Pffffttt. That's because they didn't "set up a curriculum". Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo here is that "is, is" thing again. You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe, you say end of life panels, I say death panels, I say cirriculum, you say what, lesson plan??? Either way, the speech was probably changed a lot because of the backlash, good for that... Do you have any evidence that the speech was changed, or are you going with what the GOP has told you about this speech, which so far has proven to be all lies? Do you have any evidence that is wasn't, or are you..... An open mind and a bit of common sense goes a long way... Oh, by the way, please point out the known lies I have been told. And as usual, be specific please, I am eagerly awaiting your deflection and justification.... No problem! Here's this first, just a small part of the lies the right had said about Obama's speech to school children. Pay special heed to the right's darling Jim Greer: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09...y5285256.shtml Then simply go here and read the lies you've been told about healthca http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=9916 Happy reading! The reporter seemed pretty straight up. Yes he quoted one nut, but it somebody I would never listen to.. -- Wafa free since 2009 |
I've figured it out
On Sep 9, 8:55*am, JustWait wrote:
Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo * here is that "is, is" thing again. You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe, ... What's the deal, Scott. That looks like something I'd type! |
I've figured it out
In article f4aa38df-347e-476f-98d6-
, says... On Sep 9, 8:55*am, JustWait wrote: Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo * here is that "is, is" thing again. You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe, ... What's the deal, Scott. That looks like something I'd type! I am emulating you.. hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm -- Wafa free since 2009 |
I've figured it out
wrote in message
... On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:04:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. I'm not confused, but you're attempting yet another personal attack, which is pretty low-brow. I've posted the facts. Your response was to try and put me down... unsuccessfully, however. I've told my son before that he was not a careful thinker. It was not an attack. It was an honest critique. But, then it's my contention that those that won't recognize their shortcomings won't be able to correct the same. You are not a careful thinker. You inferred a proposition from my comment that was not implied. Firstly, that's an intensly cruel thing to say to someone. No, it's not. You're invested in histrionics. Saying to your son?? Good gosh! Secondly, you don't know me near as well as you supposedly know your son. Based on a few posts, it seems hardly likely that you would know me well enough to make that judgement. I think you just prefer to put people down who don't agree with you 100%. Oh, and you're a very rude person. Like I said, low-brow. My apologies. I'll amend my original indictment. You have demonstrated at least one instance of poor thinking. It's an odd thing that you can liberally charge me with cruelty while you take umbrage with being taken to task for poor thinking. But I must remind myself that you are thinking poorly. I have not and you're just being rude. I'm not sure why. What's your agenda here? You made the statement that your treated your son to the same sort of behavior. What was your agenda with him? Do you think it really helped him or did it just make you feel better about your own supposed superiority over him. How anyone could say that to a child is beyond me. -- Nom=de=Plume |
I've figured it out
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Sep 9, 8:55 am, JustWait wrote: Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo here is that "is, is" thing again. You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe, ... What's the deal, Scott. That looks like something I'd type! ************************************************** **** Good Lord! I may have to take Justhate back out from my loonie bin. His posts are worth the price of admission here all by themselves. Boy, I wish LooneyTunes, Dingy Dan etc would stay put as well as the Freak does. |
I've figured it out
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:03:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:04:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... I'm not confused, but you're attempting yet another personal attack, which is pretty low-brow. I've posted the facts. Your response was to try and put me down... unsuccessfully, however. I've told my son before that he was not a careful thinker. It was not an attack. It was an honest critique. But, then it's my contention that those that won't recognize their shortcomings won't be able to correct the same. You are not a careful thinker. You inferred a proposition from my comment that was not implied. Firstly, that's an intensly cruel thing to say to someone. No, it's not. You're invested in histrionics. Saying to your son?? Good gosh! Secondly, you don't know me near as well as you supposedly know your son. Based on a few posts, it seems hardly likely that you would know me well enough to make that judgement. I think you just prefer to put people down who don't agree with you 100%. Oh, and you're a very rude person. Like I said, low-brow. My apologies. I'll amend my original indictment. You have demonstrated at least one instance of poor thinking. It's an odd thing that you can liberally charge me with cruelty while you take umbrage with being taken to task for poor thinking. But I must remind myself that you are thinking poorly. I have not and you're just being rude. I'm not sure why. What's your agenda here? You made the statement that your treated your son to the same sort of behavior. What was your agenda with him? Do you think it really helped him or did it just make you feel better about your own supposed superiority over him. How anyone could say that to a child is beyond me. You are either thinking poorly, or you are retreating to sophistry. To wit, I did not say that I was rendering a severe criticism to "a child," as though it were an adult verses a juvenile. I offered an honest criticism to a young man. And that young man understood the spirit in which that criticism was given and did not take offense. Even still, if he had taken offense and had reciprocated with a criticism of me to vindicate himself, he would be guilty of the tu quoque logical fallacy in an instance of poor thinking. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
I've figured it out
JustWait wrote:
In article f4aa38df-347e-476f-98d6- , says... On Sep 9, 8:55 am, JustWait wrote: Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo here is that "is, is" thing again. You say tomatoe, I say tomatoe, ... What's the deal, Scott. That looks like something I'd type! I am emulating you.. hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm You can't! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com