"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 9, 4:09 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 9, 3:04 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 8, 10:15 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Would Jesus approve of the violence perpetrated by Mohammed and his
army?

Of course not.
Then you just proved my original point as being correct. Thank you.

Your point? That Mohammed was a bad man, advocating violence?

You held him up as not being a violent man. Now you agree that he
was, and Jesus would not agree with his actions.

He was not particularly violent. I stand by my previous comments.
Disagreeing with someone doesn't mean they would be enemies.


Nom=de=Plume


Non violent? He was wounded a couple times and was in a bunch of major
battles. Mohammidism would not be big today if his armies had not conquered
most of Europe. He was knocking on the door to Paris when he was forced
back to the African continent.