On Sep 1, 11:06*am, H the K wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Aug 31, 10:02 pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.

Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?

Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.

I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....

I suppose they exist, but I cannot offhand think of any decent colleges
or universities that receive "no federal assistance." Even if they have
students with federal grants, the schools are receiving federal assistance.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Depends on what you call a "decent" school, Harry.

Oh and if the students recieve federal and state grants, then the
schools do too?

I suppose that applies to all the schools vendors as well. Even the
power company that feeds the school electricity....

On Sep 1, 10:38*am, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Aug 31, 10:02*pm, H the K wrote:| Tim wrote:

| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.

Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?


Sure the guys got more funding than the girls when I was in school,
because the guy's side of sports is more pupular, and it is still
today.

But now that you mention it, a lot of schools budgeting goes into the
sports program and in many cases academics suffer because of such.

But, what's new?

Tim wrote:
On Sep 1, 11:06 am, H the K wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|On Aug 31, 10:02 pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.
Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?
Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.
I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....
I suppose they exist, but I cannot offhand think of any decent colleges
or universities that receive "no federal assistance." Even if they have
students with federal grants, the schools are receiving federal assistance.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Depends on what you call a "decent" school, Harry.

Oh and if the students recieve federal and state grants, then the
schools do too?

I suppose that applies to all the schools vendors as well. Even the
power company that feeds the school electricity....




If the students use taxpayer guaranteed money to pay tuition, et cetera,
yeah, the schools are recipients of taxpayer largess. Also, the schools
have to be on an "approved" list. It would be difficult to get a federal
student loan or Pell grant to attend Harry's College of Debauchery for
Of-Age Young Women.

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:38:06 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Aug 31, 10:02*pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.

Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?

Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.

I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....

Liberty U?

jps wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:38:06 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Aug 31, 10:02 pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.

Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?

Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.

I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....

Liberty U?


Oi!

On Sep 1, 6:59*pm, H the K wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:38:06 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Aug 31, 10:02 pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.

Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?

Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.

I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....

Liberty U?

Oi!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

nope! And even if so.

so what?

Tim wrote:
On Sep 1, 6:59 pm, H the K wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:38:06 -0400, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|On Aug 31, 10:02 pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.
Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?
Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.
I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....
Liberty U?
Oi!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

nope! And even if so.

so what?


Hehehe.

The place teaches cretinism, er, creationism, as "science."

On Sep 1, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 1, 6:59 pm, H the K wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:38:06 -0400, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|On Aug 31, 10:02 pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.
Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?
Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.
I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....
Liberty U?
Oi!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

nope! *And even if so.

so what?

Hehehe.

The place teaches cretinism, er, creationism, as "science."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It does?

On Sep 1, 11:25*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:05:30 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:30:55 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
Thank a liberal.

My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
liberal or conservative?

Title 9, Ted Kennedy. We're indebted to him despite his faults.

"It is difficult to characterize the impact of Title IX on athletics
in an unbiased way. Advocates cite increases in female athletic
participation; however, such increases might have occurred in the
absence of legislation."
[...]
"The law was renamed as the Patsy T. Mink Equal Opportunity in
Education Act on October 29, 2002, upon the death of the law's
principal author, Congresswoman Patsy T. Mink. It was also written by
Oregon Congresswoman Edith Green."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX

Teddy was instrumental in getting it through.

"Teddy"? *I don't suppose you have a shrine in your basement?

I don't suppose you're ignorant of what he actually did with his life. What
did you do that even comes close?

--
Nom=de=Plume

I cannot speak for whom your question is directed, but I can only
speak for myself.

I am not ignorant of what the senator actually did with his life. And
what I have done doesn't even come close.

I stayed sober, drug free and have lived in marriage with the same
woman for thirty-seven years!

On Sep 1, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 1, 6:59 pm, H the K wrote:
jps wrote:
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:38:06 -0400, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|On Aug 31, 10:02 pm, H the K wrote:
| Tim wrote:
| On Aug 31, 9:47 am, H the K wrote:
| Thank a liberal.
|
| My daughter is in collegiate sports, why should she thank either
| liberal or conservative?
|
| Without Democrat Patsy Mink, who wrote the legislation that became Title
| IX, and without Ted Kennedy, who protected Title IX and advocated for it
| throughout his career, women's athletics at universities would be where
| they were 40 years ago...an underfunded afterthought. Without Title IX,
| there would be virtually no athletic assistance for women attending college.
|
|My daughters school doesn't receive federal assistance, and if they do
|it's very minimal.
|
|My daughter receives no federal assistance because the wife and I make
|too much money, so we pay the bills.
Title IX is not about money.... it is about discrimination based on
sex. Think about men's athletics vs. women's athletics, when you were
in school.... any difference in funding from the school?
Now, the hammer is that if the school receives Federal Assistance, the
school can't treat the girls that way.
I guess, if you want to create a school and pay your own way, you can
be as discriminatory as you wish....
Liberty U?
Oi!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

nope! *And even if so.

so what?

Hehehe.

The place teaches cretinism, er, creationism, as "science."

Herr Krause. You seem intimidated by the religious to the point that
you would draft foolish statements. Why are you so mockingly defensive
and belittling of those of faith?