|
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. I don't believe in name-calling no matter who does it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:09:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. Do you think randomness is more simple than a plan? -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:09:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. Do you think randomness is more simple than a plan? Yes. Why would anyone think otherwise? (or is that the plan? lol) Now, ask me if I believe in God! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:35:36 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:09:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. Do you think randomness is more simple than a plan? Yes. Why would anyone think otherwise? (or is that the plan? lol) Now, ask me if I believe in God! I don't care what your religious beliefs may or may not be. If they're your *beliefs*, I'll not ridicule them. Of course, that doesn't mean I'll agree with them either. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. We really never see it... From what I can see, the Pink Army is pretty much giving up as nobody, and I mean nobody but they, give a flying **** what they say... Like I have said before, why would anybody want to waste time with WF3, and the pink army? I don't deal with liars, drunks, junkies, or cowards... I pity them, but really have no time for them... I just added wf3yh to the list. Got rid of 80+ posts in about half a milllesecond. Aren't 'puters great? -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
In article ,
says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. We really never see it... From what I can see, the Pink Army is pretty much giving up as nobody, and I mean nobody but they, give a flying **** what they say... Like I have said before, why would anybody want to waste time with WF3, and the pink army? I don't deal with liars, drunks, junkies, or cowards... I pity them, but really have no time for them... I just added wf3yh to the list. Got rid of 80+ posts in about half a milllesecond. Aren't 'puters great? Yup... We still have plenty of honest if not misguided libs here to discuss things with, without name calling and outright lies about everything from screwdrivers to lobsta' boats... snerk -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sep 3, 8:35*pm, JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan.. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. We really never see it... From what I can see, the Pink Army is pretty much giving up as nobody, and I mean nobody but they, give a flying **** what they say... Like I have said before, why would anybody want to waste time with WF3, and the pink army? I don't deal with liars, drunks, junkies, or cowards... I pity them, but really have no time for them.... I just added wf3yh to the list. Got rid of 80+ posts in about half a milllesecond. Aren't 'puters great? Yup... We still have plenty of honest if not misguided libs here to discuss things with, without name calling and outright lies about everything from screwdrivers to lobsta' boats... snerk -- Wafa free since 2009- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed! |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
nom=de=plume wrote:
I don't suppose you're ignorant of what he actually did with his life. What did you do that even comes close? I'll bet he never left the scene of an accident to let a young girl die. Johnson |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com