wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/nerne6

Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in
Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little)
don't agree.

have you stopped beating your wife?

proof obama's screwing up?

none. none at all

you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8.



John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam.

On Aug 30, 5:34*pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/nerne6

Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in
Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little)
don't agree.

have you stopped beating your wife?

proof obama's screwing up?

none. none at all

you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8.

John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam.

If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 30, 5:34 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/nerne6
Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in
Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little)
don't agree.
have you stopped beating your wife?
proof obama's screwing up?
none. none at all
you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8.
John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam.

If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.

There's no need to find "contradictions" in your political posts. In
fact, there's no need to take your political posts seriously. They're
just the droolings of a far-right extremist. You're cut from the same
irresponsible and ill-informed cloth as your brethern he herring,
justhate, lu-ser, bar, et cetera.

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 30, 5:34 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/nerne6
Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in
Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little)
don't agree.
have you stopped beating your wife?
proof obama's screwing up?
none. none at all
you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8.
John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam.

If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.

Oh, really?

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 30, 5:34 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/nerne6
Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in
Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little)
don't agree.
have you stopped beating your wife?
proof obama's screwing up?
none. none at all
you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8.
John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam.

If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.

Oh, really?

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:


If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.

Oh, really?

I thought O'Reilly was a conservative.

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:02:11 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:


If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.

Oh, really?

I thought O'Reilly was a conservative.

Nope.
--
John H

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Thomas Jefferson

thunder wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:


If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.
Oh, really?

I thought O'Reilly was a conservative.

Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid!

In article ,
says...

thunder wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:


If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.
Oh, really?

I thought O'Reilly was a conservative.

Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid!

He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his
stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We
get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad...

--
Wafa free since 2009

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:


If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no
semi-intelligent liberals.
Oh, really?
I thought O'Reilly was a conservative.
Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid!

He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his
stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We
get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad...


No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in
edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster.