Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. Is that what they told you this week... You should seek out your own information and form your own opinion... I can form my own opinions. I've told you that before, that's why I can see good and bad in every political point, and don't instantly defend one or the other without knowing the facts. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. Is that what they told you this week... You should seek out your own information and form your own opinion... I can form my own opinions. I've told you that before, that's why I can see good and bad in every political point, and don't instantly defend one or the other without knowing the facts. Yeah, I guess you sit and watch Bill every night, right? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role... | General | |||
The role of government | General | |||
Notice how the liberals no longer mention Afghanistan | ASA | |||
( OT ) Democracy and free enterprise come to Afghanistan | General | |||
ROLE ME IN FLOWER AND AIM FOR MY WET SPOT! | Power Boat Racing |