| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
|
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. Is that what they told you this week... You should seek out your own information and form your own opinion... I can form my own opinions. I've told you that before, that's why I can see good and bad in every political point, and don't instantly defend one or the other without knowing the facts. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. Is that what they told you this week... You should seek out your own information and form your own opinion... I can form my own opinions. I've told you that before, that's why I can see good and bad in every political point, and don't instantly defend one or the other without knowing the facts. Yeah, I guess you sit and watch Bill every night, right? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com