|
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
http://tinyurl.com/nerne6
Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. Can't wait to see the 'metrics'. I'm sure one will be, "How many lives were saved this month?" After all, Obama saved over 700,000 jobs during the month of August alone. What a man. -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
On Aug 30, 7:40*am, John H. wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. have you stopped beating your wife? proof obama's screwing up? none. none at all you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
On Aug 30, 9:42*am, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:09:36 -0400, NotNow wrote: John H. wrote: On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:15:41 -0400, NotNow wrote: John H. wrote: http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. Can't wait to see the 'metrics'. I'm sure one will be, "How many lives were saved this month?" After all, Obama saved over 700,000 jobs during the month of August alone. What a man. -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." * Thomas Jefferson Just how is Obama screwing up in Afghanistan? By being a liberal? Try reading. *http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 -- John H He's "screwing up" because he's instituted a method for measuring progress there? Loogy, I'll make one more comment to you today: I didn't say, in my post, that he was screwing up. I asked a question. The intent of the question was to show that the 'Bush Rationale' (used by *every* liberal here) was not going to be used by thinking Democrats. In other words, it's not OK to say, Bush screwed up Iraq, so it's OK if BO screws up Afghanistan. I hope you get it, 'cause you're not gettin' any mo'. -- bush did screw up in iraq. ain't no comparison to afghanistan |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote: http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. have you stopped beating your wife? proof obama's screwing up? none. none at all you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8. John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
On Aug 30, 5:34*pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote: http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. have you stopped beating your wife? proof obama's screwing up? none. none at all you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8. John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam. If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 30, 5:34 pm, H the K wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote: http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. have you stopped beating your wife? proof obama's screwing up? none. none at all you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8. John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam. If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. There's no need to find "contradictions" in your political posts. In fact, there's no need to take your political posts seriously. They're just the droolings of a far-right extremist. You're cut from the same irresponsible and ill-informed cloth as your brethern he herring, justhate, lu-ser, bar, et cetera. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 30, 5:34 pm, H the K wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote: http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. have you stopped beating your wife? proof obama's screwing up? none. none at all you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8. John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam. If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 30, 5:34 pm, H the K wrote: wf3h wrote: On Aug 30, 7:40 am, John H. wrote: http://tinyurl.com/nerne6 Bush screwed up in Iraq, so it's OK for Obama to screw up in Afghanistan? Apparently those who are able to think (even a little) don't agree. have you stopped beating your wife? proof obama's screwing up? none. none at all you probably would have surrendered to japan on dec 8. John H. (herring) contributed to our disaster in vietnam. If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:02:11 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Nope. -- John H "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
|
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. Is that what they told you this week... You should seek out your own information and form your own opinion... I can form my own opinions. I've told you that before, that's why I can see good and bad in every political point, and don't instantly defend one or the other without knowing the facts. |
Even semi-intelligent liberals question Afghanistan role...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... thunder wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0400, NotNow wrote: If you find a contradiction, check your assumptions, ie, There are no semi-intelligent liberals. Oh, really? I thought O'Reilly was a conservative. Yeah, but OReilly's just plain stupid! He is actually a very intelligent dude, does his homework, knows his stuff... But I guess being a righty automatically makes him stupid... We get it, liberal=good, conservative=bad... No, he's just an old blow hard that won't let a person get a word in edge ways, just like Harry, he's all bluster. Is that what they told you this week... You should seek out your own information and form your own opinion... I can form my own opinions. I've told you that before, that's why I can see good and bad in every political point, and don't instantly defend one or the other without knowing the facts. Yeah, I guess you sit and watch Bill every night, right? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com