|
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: Nope, Armitage outed the agent to Novak. At least read a little before spewing out. You are the one who want's to assure that nobody is called guilty until convicted, but I guess when it comes to repubs you can call them "traitor who outed a CIA agent" because he is a republican, even though he got convicted of providing false information, that's all. Now if you want to convict someone of outing CIA agents, let's have an investigation into the recent activity by the ACLU following real covert agents home, photographing them and their families, and showing them to prisoners and admitted AlQueda agents at Gitmo. And before you deflect, please go to their page and read the admission in their own words. OJ is innocent even though he was found responsible in court, but Scooter is guilty of "treason" even though he didn't get convicted of anything near that.. Man, your double standard showing... Moron. Harry, nice refutation of the facts. "Moron" is all the moron deserves. It means I can refute the facts presented so I'll just call you a name. It's third grade behavior. You apparently have "short memory syndrome." Remember, I told you, probably a dozen times, I have no interest in "debating" or "discussing" issues with right-wing retards. JustWait is a right-wing retard. So are you. There is nothing to be gained by having retards "expand" on what they perceive as "the issues." Oh, I'm not saying everyone here who is right of center is a retard. |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote: H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: Nope, Armitage outed the agent to Novak. At least read a little before spewing out. You are the one who want's to assure that nobody is called guilty until convicted, but I guess when it comes to repubs you can call them "traitor who outed a CIA agent" because he is a republican, even though he got convicted of providing false information, that's all. Now if you want to convict someone of outing CIA agents, let's have an investigation into the recent activity by the ACLU following real covert agents home, photographing them and their families, and showing them to prisoners and admitted AlQueda agents at Gitmo. And before you deflect, please go to their page and read the admission in their own words. OJ is innocent even though he was found responsible in court, but Scooter is guilty of "treason" even though he didn't get convicted of anything near that.. Man, your double standard showing... Moron. Harry, nice refutation of the facts. "Moron" is all the moron deserves. It means I can refute the facts presented so I'll just call you a name. It's third grade behavior. You apparently have "short memory syndrome." Remember, I told you, probably a dozen times, I have no interest in "debating" or "discussing" issues with right-wing retards. JustWait is a right-wing retard. So are you. There is nothing to be gained by having retards "expand" on what they perceive as "the issues." Oh, I'm not saying everyone here who is right of center is a retard. You are too easy to get a response out of Harry. All I have to do is pull your leash and you yelp. |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: Nope, Armitage outed the agent to Novak. At least read a little before spewing out. You are the one who want's to assure that nobody is called guilty until convicted, but I guess when it comes to repubs you can call them "traitor who outed a CIA agent" because he is a republican, even though he got convicted of providing false information, that's all. Now if you want to convict someone of outing CIA agents, let's have an investigation into the recent activity by the ACLU following real covert agents home, photographing them and their families, and showing them to prisoners and admitted AlQueda agents at Gitmo. And before you deflect, please go to their page and read the admission in their own words. OJ is innocent even though he was found responsible in court, but Scooter is guilty of "treason" even though he didn't get convicted of anything near that.. Man, your double standard showing... Moron. Harry, nice refutation of the facts. "Moron" is all the moron deserves. It means I can refute the facts presented so I'll just call you a name. It's third grade behavior. You apparently have "short memory syndrome." Remember, I told you, probably a dozen times, I have no interest in "debating" or "discussing" issues with right-wing retards. JustWait is a right-wing retard. So are you. There is nothing to be gained by having retards "expand" on what they perceive as "the issues." Oh, I'm not saying everyone here who is right of center is a retard. You are too easy to get a response out of Harry. All I have to do is pull your leash and you yelp. Yawn. Keep on congratulating yourself, moron. It's typical right-wing retardo behavior here. |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: Nope, Armitage outed the agent to Novak. At least read a little before spewing out. You are the one who want's to assure that nobody is called guilty until convicted, but I guess when it comes to repubs you can call them "traitor who outed a CIA agent" because he is a republican, even though he got convicted of providing false information, that's all. Now if you want to convict someone of outing CIA agents, let's have an investigation into the recent activity by the ACLU following real covert agents home, photographing them and their families, and showing them to prisoners and admitted AlQueda agents at Gitmo. And before you deflect, please go to their page and read the admission in their own words. OJ is innocent even though he was found responsible in court, but Scooter is guilty of "treason" even though he didn't get convicted of anything near that.. Man, your double standard showing... Moron. Harry, nice refutation of the facts. Gee. I thought it was his autobiography. |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
"John H" wrote in message
... On Aug 29, 1:57 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Bush's screwup were never OK. Thank you! I'm not going to ask which screwup was not ok, but.... lol -- Nom=de=Plume Did I make a typo? Glad it gave you a chuckle. Proof that liberals can see humor in anything and conservatives aren't perfect. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:56:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. I can't speak for other people, but I'm not justifying any actions. I'm making a direct comparison. At the end of 8 (I'm hopeful) years, we can compare the records more completely. For now, there are some obvious comparisons possible. Call it what you will. It is what it is. "Bush screwed up, therefore Obama's screwups are OK." Give me a break. And, yet again, I have to disagree. No one is claiming that because Bush screwed up, Obama's mistakes are ok. Horse manure! That's the biggest laugh I've had in a month. Are you claiming that no comparisons are valid? Isn't that the basis for a program (a Bush program) called No Child Left Behind? Comparisons are benchmarks. They are totally valid. The issue is making justifiable comparisons. Well, I certainly will concede that using "No one" is a bit of an exaggeration, but I'm certainly not doing that. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
"BAR" wrote in message
... Are you claiming that no comparisons are valid? Isn't that the basis for a program (a Bush program) called No Child Left Behind? Comparisons are benchmarks. They are totally valid. The issue is making justifiable comparisons. Funny how No Child Left Behind winds up in Kennedy's top 10 legislative accomplishments. http://tinyurl.com/kns4ck Kennedy worked closely with President George W. Bush to advance the No Child Left Behind Act, one of Bush's earliest accomplishments and, critics say, his last meaningful attempt at bipartisanship. I might even agree with this. It *was* an accomplishment, but it fell flat for reasons previously stated. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... Are you claiming that no comparisons are valid? Isn't that the basis for a program (a Bush program) called No Child Left Behind? Comparisons are benchmarks. They are totally valid. The issue is making justifiable comparisons. Funny how No Child Left Behind winds up in Kennedy's top 10 legislative accomplishments. http://tinyurl.com/kns4ck Kennedy worked closely with President George W. Bush to advance the No Child Left Behind Act, one of Bush's earliest accomplishments and, critics say, his last meaningful attempt at bipartisanship. I might even agree with this. It *was* an accomplishment, but it fell flat for reasons previously stated. Why does your opinion carry more weight than Time's? |
Uh, oh, most conservatives aren't going to like this!!!!
"BAR" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Are you claiming that no comparisons are valid? Isn't that the basis for a program (a Bush program) called No Child Left Behind? Comparisons are benchmarks. They are totally valid. The issue is making justifiable comparisons. Funny how No Child Left Behind winds up in Kennedy's top 10 legislative accomplishments. http://tinyurl.com/kns4ck Kennedy worked closely with President George W. Bush to advance the No Child Left Behind Act, one of Bush's earliest accomplishments and, critics say, his last meaningful attempt at bipartisanship. I might even agree with this. It *was* an accomplishment, but it fell flat for reasons previously stated. Why does your opinion carry more weight than Time's? Why do you think it does? Do you believe everything you read in Time? -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com