BoatBanter.com - The Kennedy Legacy

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 27, 12:13 pm, NotNow wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 27, 11:08 am, wf3h wrote:
On Aug 27, 10:44 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Liberals made a pact with the devil after Chappaquidick, they'd allow
any level of personal failings, including murder, rape, abuse of
women, anything as long as the person voted the right way. Thus,
Kennedy and his friends were encouraged to continue preying on women
guess 'froggie' hasn't heard about gov sanford of SC and rep. vitner
of LA...
and otherwise abusing their power as long as they voted "correctly".
It was this agreement that allowed Clinton to get away with his
abusing women and taking sexual advantage of employees. Of course,
this agreement did not extend to Repubs where they lynched Clarence
Thomas over a mild joke about a pubic hair on a coke can and with Bob
Packwood hounded from office over a diary he kept or Larry Craig who
just wanted a BJ. In the minds of Libs, Craig wanting BJ is a major
crime whereas murder and rape are forgivable if one votes correctly.
guess he forgot that it was rednecks who made a big issue out of
publicizing the sanctity of their private morality...except that they
expect a pass when they fail
oh well...no one ever said rednecks are logical
OMG, Sanford had a consensual affair with a grown woman, that is SO
much worse than murder, rape and sexual assault.
When was Ted Kennedy found guilty of murder, rape and sexual assault?
OH, he was never found guilty, he used his money and power to prevent
it.
Okay, then, don't suggest that he was.
Yeah, and OJ is innocent too.

Yes, as a matter of fact.

So, are you saying that "because he was not convicted he is innocent"?
Not true, all that means is he is "not guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt", no judge ever called him innocent. At the same time he was "held
responsible" in a civil court. So, if he is not considered innocent in
any court, and guilty in another, I would argue I can honestly say, he
was found guilty.. simple.

Now, of course you probably still think he is "not guilty" so I suppose
I will stop hearing stupid **** like "Bush broke the law, Cheney
too..""? Right? Cause we wouldn't want to have a double standard here,
right??

Courts of law do not make findings of innocence.

Courts of public opinion are not bound by laws.