|
The Kennedy Legacy
|
The Kennedy Legacy
|
The Kennedy Legacy
|
The Kennedy Legacy
|
The Kennedy Legacy
|
The Kennedy Legacy
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 12:13 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 11:08 am, wf3h wrote: On Aug 27, 10:44 am, Frogwatch wrote: Liberals made a pact with the devil after Chappaquidick, they'd allow any level of personal failings, including murder, rape, abuse of women, anything as long as the person voted the right way. Thus, Kennedy and his friends were encouraged to continue preying on women guess 'froggie' hasn't heard about gov sanford of SC and rep. vitner of LA... and otherwise abusing their power as long as they voted "correctly". It was this agreement that allowed Clinton to get away with his abusing women and taking sexual advantage of employees. Of course, this agreement did not extend to Repubs where they lynched Clarence Thomas over a mild joke about a pubic hair on a coke can and with Bob Packwood hounded from office over a diary he kept or Larry Craig who just wanted a BJ. In the minds of Libs, Craig wanting BJ is a major crime whereas murder and rape are forgivable if one votes correctly. guess he forgot that it was rednecks who made a big issue out of publicizing the sanctity of their private morality...except that they expect a pass when they fail oh well...no one ever said rednecks are logical OMG, Sanford had a consensual affair with a grown woman, that is SO much worse than murder, rape and sexual assault. When was Ted Kennedy found guilty of murder, rape and sexual assault? OH, he was never found guilty, he used his money and power to prevent it. Okay, then, don't suggest that he was. Yeah, and OJ is innocent too. Yes, as a matter of fact. So, are you saying that "because he was not convicted he is innocent"? Not true, all that means is he is "not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt", no judge ever called him innocent. At the same time he was "held responsible" in a civil court. So, if he is not considered innocent in any court, and guilty in another, I would argue I can honestly say, he was found guilty.. simple. Now, of course you probably still think he is "not guilty" so I suppose I will stop hearing stupid **** like "Bush broke the law, Cheney too..""? Right? Cause we wouldn't want to have a double standard here, right?? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
The Kennedy Legacy
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 12:46 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 12:13 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 11:08 am, wf3h wrote: On Aug 27, 10:44 am, Frogwatch wrote: Liberals made a pact with the devil after Chappaquidick, they'd allow any level of personal failings, including murder, rape, abuse of women, anything as long as the person voted the right way. Thus, Kennedy and his friends were encouraged to continue preying on women guess 'froggie' hasn't heard about gov sanford of SC and rep. vitner of LA... and otherwise abusing their power as long as they voted "correctly". It was this agreement that allowed Clinton to get away with his abusing women and taking sexual advantage of employees. Of course, this agreement did not extend to Repubs where they lynched Clarence Thomas over a mild joke about a pubic hair on a coke can and with Bob Packwood hounded from office over a diary he kept or Larry Craig who just wanted a BJ. In the minds of Libs, Craig wanting BJ is a major crime whereas murder and rape are forgivable if one votes correctly. guess he forgot that it was rednecks who made a big issue out of publicizing the sanctity of their private morality...except that they expect a pass when they fail oh well...no one ever said rednecks are logical OMG, Sanford had a consensual affair with a grown woman, that is SO much worse than murder, rape and sexual assault. When was Ted Kennedy found guilty of murder, rape and sexual assault? OH, he was never found guilty, he used his money and power to prevent it. Okay, then, don't suggest that he was. Murder is not murder if you are a rich Dem Senator. Greta values you libs have there. If he was found guilty of murder, so be it. He wasn't. Do you not understand that he was let off because he was a Kennedy? We have a bunch of them here in CT too. One is in Jail for rape, another for murder but it took decades and a ballsy prosecutor to get that bitch. If you grew up arond the North East, you know right where the Kennedys stand... Get informed Loogie, stop making everything dem good, repub bad.. It's getting old.. It doesn't matter. Informed????? Are you SERIOUS? Because I know that he was never found to be guilty of murder in a court of law? Anyone can say anything about anybody, but unless it's proven in court, it doesn't stand a chance. Seeing how you are so 'informed' perhaps you should have taken your evidence of his guilt to the Supreme Court and had him tried. I as a citizen really can't take anything directly to the supreme court.. But I am glad to hear you presume all innocent until proven guilty, it should slow down all the accusations against Bush and Cheney... Unless there is a double standard, right? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
The Kennedy Legacy
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 12:13 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 11:08 am, wf3h wrote: On Aug 27, 10:44 am, Frogwatch wrote: Liberals made a pact with the devil after Chappaquidick, they'd allow any level of personal failings, including murder, rape, abuse of women, anything as long as the person voted the right way. Thus, Kennedy and his friends were encouraged to continue preying on women guess 'froggie' hasn't heard about gov sanford of SC and rep. vitner of LA... and otherwise abusing their power as long as they voted "correctly". It was this agreement that allowed Clinton to get away with his abusing women and taking sexual advantage of employees. Of course, this agreement did not extend to Repubs where they lynched Clarence Thomas over a mild joke about a pubic hair on a coke can and with Bob Packwood hounded from office over a diary he kept or Larry Craig who just wanted a BJ. In the minds of Libs, Craig wanting BJ is a major crime whereas murder and rape are forgivable if one votes correctly. guess he forgot that it was rednecks who made a big issue out of publicizing the sanctity of their private morality...except that they expect a pass when they fail oh well...no one ever said rednecks are logical OMG, Sanford had a consensual affair with a grown woman, that is SO much worse than murder, rape and sexual assault. When was Ted Kennedy found guilty of murder, rape and sexual assault? OH, he was never found guilty, he used his money and power to prevent it. Okay, then, don't suggest that he was. Yeah, and OJ is innocent too. Yes, as a matter of fact. So, are you saying that "because he was not convicted he is innocent"? Not true, all that means is he is "not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt", no judge ever called him innocent. At the same time he was "held responsible" in a civil court. So, if he is not considered innocent in any court, and guilty in another, I would argue I can honestly say, he was found guilty.. simple. Now, of course you probably still think he is "not guilty" so I suppose I will stop hearing stupid **** like "Bush broke the law, Cheney too..""? Right? Cause we wouldn't want to have a double standard here, right?? When/where did I say Bush broke the law? Where did I say Cheney broke the law? By the way, Bush DID break the law, and was arrested for it. |
The Kennedy Legacy
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 12:46 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 12:13 pm, NotNow wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 27, 11:08 am, wf3h wrote: On Aug 27, 10:44 am, Frogwatch wrote: Liberals made a pact with the devil after Chappaquidick, they'd allow any level of personal failings, including murder, rape, abuse of women, anything as long as the person voted the right way. Thus, Kennedy and his friends were encouraged to continue preying on women guess 'froggie' hasn't heard about gov sanford of SC and rep. vitner of LA... and otherwise abusing their power as long as they voted "correctly". It was this agreement that allowed Clinton to get away with his abusing women and taking sexual advantage of employees. Of course, this agreement did not extend to Repubs where they lynched Clarence Thomas over a mild joke about a pubic hair on a coke can and with Bob Packwood hounded from office over a diary he kept or Larry Craig who just wanted a BJ. In the minds of Libs, Craig wanting BJ is a major crime whereas murder and rape are forgivable if one votes correctly. guess he forgot that it was rednecks who made a big issue out of publicizing the sanctity of their private morality...except that they expect a pass when they fail oh well...no one ever said rednecks are logical OMG, Sanford had a consensual affair with a grown woman, that is SO much worse than murder, rape and sexual assault. When was Ted Kennedy found guilty of murder, rape and sexual assault? OH, he was never found guilty, he used his money and power to prevent it. Okay, then, don't suggest that he was. Murder is not murder if you are a rich Dem Senator. Greta values you libs have there. If he was found guilty of murder, so be it. He wasn't. Do you not understand that he was let off because he was a Kennedy? We have a bunch of them here in CT too. One is in Jail for rape, another for murder but it took decades and a ballsy prosecutor to get that bitch. If you grew up arond the North East, you know right where the Kennedys stand... Get informed Loogie, stop making everything dem good, repub bad.. It's getting old.. It doesn't matter. Informed????? Are you SERIOUS? Because I know that he was never found to be guilty of murder in a court of law? Anyone can say anything about anybody, but unless it's proven in court, it doesn't stand a chance. Seeing how you are so 'informed' perhaps you should have taken your evidence of his guilt to the Supreme Court and had him tried. I as a citizen really can't take anything directly to the supreme court.. But I am glad to hear you presume all innocent until proven guilty, it should slow down all the accusations against Bush and Cheney... Unless there is a double standard, right? So what do you do, presume all guilty until proven innocent? What accusations did I make about Bush and Cheney? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com