About Us

JustWait

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:44:50 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:20:52 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:21:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JLH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:00:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

There's no excuse. Just because one person does something horrible, that
doesn't make it ok for others.

Well...I guess we won't be hearing any more of the 'Bush Rationale'.

Loogy, w3fh, jps, Harry,---- are you watching? Ole plum guy made a
great point.
--
John H

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Thomas Jefferson
Not sure what you mean by the Bush Rationale,
Since you'e speaking nicely...

The 'Bush Rationale' is the reason many liberals provide for any
negative critique of an Obama action.

For example, "You didn't say anything when Bush did it." Or, "Bush did
it, so it's OK if Obama does it too." Hopefully you get the idea.

As I've said before, for you guys - yourself, w3fh, Harry, etc. - a
'debate' consists of personal insults and name-calling.

And, for the record, Bush may have screwed up a few things during his
eight year tenure. But, Bush is gone. Obama is trying damn hard to
catch up in his first 3/4 of a year.

since Bush's "rationale" was
based on a twisted notion of religion mixed with failed economics and
fear-stoking actions.

If you'd like to debate things that Obama has done or not done that are good
or not good for the country, and you're willing to actually cite verifiable
facts, there's room for discussion. There are plenty of facts from Bush's 8
years worthy of debate, including some things that might be construed as
"good" for America (in my opinion of course). A quick example is the African
AIDS program (except for the insertion of "abstinance" requirements). There
are a plethora of facts/decisions he and his admin made that were terrible
(my opinion and the demonstrable results)... no need to repeat them, as I'm
sure we're all familar with them.

Bush was in power for almost a decade. Obama has been in power for 3/4 of a
year. It's kind of hard to equate the two in any rational way.
I love it when the dim bulbs here tell us what the Bush Rational was,
when all they are really doing is spewing fourth an uninformed fairytale
of how they want things to be...

Do tell. Just how DO I want things to be?

However Obama wants them.
--
John H

Do you REALLY claim to know what I want??? ****, that's WORSE than
Harry's bull****.

It was sarcasm because you keep telling us how we all think about this
or that.... or what we want. I noted that your idea of what we want is
based on your own point of view. Now that that's straightened out..
Hurray, I'm going to the Nationals at Southwick tomorrow to see the big
kids race.. Stewart, Carmichael, and a host of other pros.. First time,
I am psyched!!

Wish i could join you. Was going to Lake Anna, but the possibility of
more thunderstorms has the kids worried. And, they'd rather come here
for dinner anyway. So, no boating - and I have to cook.

Heh... It's suppose to pour up here tomorrow, should make for some
interesting racing. Rather see 'em race dry, but I'll take it

--
Wafa free since 2009

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Would Sotomayor Exonerate Bill Richardson & His "Moving AmericaForward" "Latino Voter Registration" Scam?	[email protected]	General	1	June 5th 09 08:44 PM
FS: 1961 "PT 109 John F. Kennedy in World War II" Book in Ontario	J.R. Sinclair	Marketplace	0	December 19th 06 11:36 AM

Menu

About Us