|
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since
the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
wrote in message
... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:31:01 -0500, wrote: I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY Just to follow up, quickly. This is a case where it should be difficult for left-leaning persons to use the circumstantial ad hominem for which they have an irresistable penchant. It's not as though such a person can say, "Well, what do you expect from a GOP backed news organization!" I have no doubt, though, that some left-leaning person will sneak in some fallacy to in an attempt to innoculate the implications of this interview. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access I think you don't have a clew. In any case, despite several fallacious statements, I don't see the problem with criticizing Pres. Obama when he deserves criticism. So, I don't see what point you're trying to make. Is any person perfect? No. But, if you're going to compare Obama to Bush, well, we all know there was and is no skepticism or criticism allowed for Bush's reign, at least not by the likes of someone like you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:31:01 -0500, wrote: I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY Just to follow up, quickly. This is a case where it should be difficult for left-leaning persons to use the circumstantial ad hominem for which they have an irresistable penchant. It's not as though such a person can say, "Well, what do you expect from a GOP backed news organization!" I have no doubt, though, that some left-leaning person will sneak in some fallacy to in an attempt to innoculate the implications of this interview. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access And Pravda says this about US Capitalism. http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/col...n_capitalism-0 |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:37:53 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:31:01 -0500, wrote: I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY Just to follow up, quickly. This is a case where it should be difficult for left-leaning persons to use the circumstantial ad hominem for which they have an irresistable penchant. It's not as though such a person can say, "Well, what do you expect from a GOP backed news organization!" I have no doubt, though, that some left-leaning person will sneak in some fallacy to in an attempt to innoculate the implications of this interview. Huh? Why would anybody argue with this? Might as well argue the sun rises in the west. Do you have a point to make? If so, I missed it. --Vic |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
On Aug 25, 11:31*pm, wrote:
I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. * RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. *Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. *This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. *It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY yawn.... |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:31 pm, wrote: I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY yawn.... Yet more bull**** from the right that doesn't pass the WGAS test... WGAS...who gives a ****? |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 11:31 pm, wrote: I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY yawn.... Yet more bull**** from the right that doesn't pass the WGAS test... WGAS...who gives a ****? And still WAFA has to comment. What a moron. |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:28:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:31:01 -0500, wrote: I was a Russian Linguist/intercept operator in the military, and since the advent of youtube I have subscribed to RussiaToday, since I still have a casual interest in Russian affairs. RT runs daily newsclips on Youtube, and as a news organization it sits well to the Left of things. Too, RT covers American politics with alacrity. This clip is a rather surprising interview conducted by RT. It's rather interesting, and their assessment of the American press, I think, can't be so readily dismissed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I2ADBZvpY Just to follow up, quickly. This is a case where it should be difficult for left-leaning persons to use the circumstantial ad hominem for which they have an irresistable penchant. It's not as though such a person can say, "Well, what do you expect from a GOP backed news organization!" I have no doubt, though, that some left-leaning person will sneak in some fallacy to in an attempt to innoculate the implications of this interview. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access I think you don't have a clew. In any case, despite several fallacious statements, I don't see the problem with criticizing Pres. Obama when he deserves criticism. So, I don't see what point you're trying to make. Is any person perfect? No. But, if you're going to compare Obama to Bush, well, we all know there was and is no skepticism or criticism allowed for Bush's reign, at least not by the likes of someone like you. I really didn't think I was that oblique in my presentation. I certainly don't have a "clew" as to what you're attempting to rebut. The point here is that a consipcuously left-leaning news organization, Russia Today, is matter-of-factly stating that the American news media has a tangible left-wing bias for the most part. And RT doesn't have a dog in the fight, so to speak. IOW, they're fairly detached observers of the american political conversation in this respect. Consequently, it robs the left-leaning pundits of one of their favorite informal fallacies, the circumstantial ad hominem, in defending the liberal media. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
An Honest Perspective from a Very Left-leaning News Organization
wrote in message
... I really didn't think I was that oblique in my presentation. I certainly don't have a "clew" as to what you're attempting to rebut. The point here is that a consipcuously left-leaning news organization, Russia Today, is matter-of-factly stating that the American news media has a tangible left-wing bias for the most part. And RT doesn't have a dog in the fight, so to speak. IOW, they're fairly detached observers of the american political conversation in this respect. Consequently, it robs the left-leaning pundits of one of their favorite informal fallacies, the circumstantial ad hominem, in defending the liberal media. Let me get this straight... you're a right-wing nutcase citing a Russian source that considers the possibility that Obama might not be perfect. Yet, there I'm doubtful that there's a single person on this newsgroup who believe Obama should not be criticized if he deserves it. Even MSNBC criticizes him multiple times a week. Do you consider Rush or O'Really liberal? How about Lew Dobbs? I won't even mention the moron Glen Beck. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com