Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: Humorous Vic, but even your own reference states: "allowing the NSC (which is essentially a White House arm) to have oversight of the HIG might give Obama and future Presidents too much control..." Why create more bureaucracy when we already have plenty in place? And then place it under the control of the White House? Don't have a conclusive answer, but I have heard time and time again that the FBI has the most productive interrogation techniques of any agency, and the CIA can't hold a candle to them. No expertise. As far as bureaucracy, I've heard that all the outsourcing done in the last 15 or so years just adds layers, and costs. Couldn't believe the Army can't cook for itself, and Blackwater gets hired for that at much more cost. I'd like to see some cost numbers on what the CIA paid its contracted "interrogators" versus what it would cost the FBI to do it. --Vic |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|