|
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Aug 24, 4:20*pm, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:27:05 -0400, NotNow wrote: Damned liberals want to kill the elderly...... How crazy can you guys get? ...and kill the unborn babies. i know, i know. the right wing is SSOOOOOO upset they can't steal the money the middle class will use for health insurance... |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote: I am not a liar, and have never been accused of such here by anybody who is listening. Liar, liar, pants on fire. No source, he's a liar. He's one of the people I blocked, so if he were to show a creditable source, I'd never know unless someone responds to him. I'll bet he does not have a CREDITABLE source. That makes him a LIAR. You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. |
Right wing LIARS
Jim wrote:
H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: I am not a liar, and have never been accused of such here by anybody who is listening. Liar, liar, pants on fire. No source, he's a liar. He's one of the people I blocked, so if he were to show a creditable source, I'd never know unless someone responds to him. I'll bet he does not have a CREDITABLE source. That makes him a LIAR. You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. It's not an accusation, it's a FACT that you are a liar, because you cannot show where you got that quote. This is a tactic of the right, to make up stuff, hoping to make "the lefties loose it" ruining any chance of actual dialogue. It doesn't work on me, because I'm aware of the tactic. People who lie, like JustWait, Sara Palin and Betsy McCaughey should be called on it when they LIE and make up "facts" when the real facts don't go their way. http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/...100236356.html |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Aug 21, 6:40*am, Guzzistimo wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:31:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: i love the assumptions these morons make. they assume the only healthcare that would be covered is euthanasia. ...and abortions, for sure. Or is Obama changing the name to 'reproductive care'? -- guess you don't know any more about the health bill than you do about anything else. after all you're a dedicated rush listener/ |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Aug 21, 10:34*am, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message yep. he's got *his fantasies and 'guzz' thinks we should just believe 'em and shut up. no reform needed. --------------------------------- Having made a nice fortune, he now gets paid $1.00 a year, and distributes earnings from stock options to needy causes. What do you loony lefties contribute of your own money? Ten per cent of my meager earnings goes to charity. masturbation is not a charity |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
|
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
In article ,
says... H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: I am not a liar, and have never been accused of such here by anybody who is listening. Liar, liar, pants on fire. No source, he's a liar. He's one of the people I blocked, so if he were to show a creditable source, I'd never know unless someone responds to him. I'll bet he does not have a CREDITABLE source. That makes him a LIAR. You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
"JustWait" wrote in message
... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. -- Nom=de=Plume |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: I am not a liar, and have never been accused of such here by anybody who is listening. Liar, liar, pants on fire. No source, he's a liar. He's one of the people I blocked, so if he were to show a creditable source, I'd never know unless someone responds to him. I'll bet he does not have a CREDITABLE source. That makes him a LIAR. You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Uh, **** you... Wow...cursing from the original No Action Talk Only little schitt. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. JustWait touts himself as a network/internet guru, but he can't figure out how to set up an email/newsgroup reader. What he is...is unemployable. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You would be right if he said anything like you are trying to say he did at 1:48. He did not. He did not say the words "Death panels," until 2:31, where he actually said, "Some how it's gotten spun into 'death panels,' which I'm not in favor of." You are lacking something if you think you said anything here other than try to leave a smoke screen. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: I am not a liar, and have never been accused of such here by anybody who is listening. Liar, liar, pants on fire. No source, he's a liar. He's one of the people I blocked, so if he were to show a creditable source, I'd never know unless someone responds to him. I'll bet he does not have a CREDITABLE source. That makes him a LIAR. You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Uh, **** you... Name calling is what people do when they can't support their firmly held position, in the face of facts that don't fit. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
In article ,
says... On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. Thanks Tom. The guy is already gone but I do hate being called a liar, by uh, liars... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You would be right if he said anything like you are trying to say he did at 1:48. He did not. He did not say the words "Death panels," until 2:31, where he actually said, "Some how it's gotten spun into 'death panels,' which I'm not in favor of." You are lacking something if you think you said anything here other than try to leave a smoke screen. Now, it's been spun into "death books" by the low-brain-output types. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K
wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated. COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years. That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels. I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
In article ,
says... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated. COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years. That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels. I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. It's easy... [Tools} [Rules] [Add] {type in "H the K") [enter]... finished business... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated. COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years. That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels. I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. It's easy... [Tools} [Rules] [Add] {type in "H the K") [enter]... finished business... There you go, Conservatives = intelligent Liberals = stupid. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated. COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years. That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels. I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. It's easy... [Tools} [Rules] [Add] {type in "H the K") [enter]... finished business... There you go, Conservatives = intelligent Liberals = stupid. Nope, you are too defensive... Tom made the comment about Liberals. I just noted a quick way to filter him out...;) -- Wafa free since 2009 |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. Bush, the conservative, turned a budget surplus into a budget deficit. I'd say math wasn't one of his, or those who stood by and watched, strong points. Logic isn't a strong point of someone who would make a sweeping statement as you did. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. Bush, the conservative, turned a budget surplus into a budget deficit. I'd say math wasn't one of his, or those who stood by and watched, strong points. Logic isn't a strong point of someone who would make a sweeping statement as you did. Yep, like Harry on the left, that's what ****es me off. Wide sweeping generalizations just aren't good intelligent debate. Me for instance, I've got more math under my belt that many, many people, and always done well in it. As a matter of fact that's why I do what I do for a living. And guess what? I'm pretty damned liberal! |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:09:05 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. I just went on SS this year, so I'm hoping the Reps will force the Dems to fix this up. Maybe end up with a 15% or so increase in my SS check. Preferably before the year is out. Best scenario would be for a Rep to actually introduce a bill, instead of simply being forced to vote for it. That would be sweet. Pretty nice seeing the Reps jump on the entitlement wagon, what with Bush's unfunded Plan B benefit for the elderly, and now their pushing for higher SS payments. Shows they care for old folks, and are the opposite of the death panel pushing Dems. Remember the gas station price wars? Sort of a reverse version. Politics is great stuff. God bless the USA!! --Vic |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:09:05 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. I just went on SS this year, so I'm hoping the Reps will force the Dems to fix this up. Maybe end up with a 15% or so increase in my SS check. Preferably before the year is out. Best scenario would be for a Rep to actually introduce a bill, instead of simply being forced to vote for it. That would be sweet. Pretty nice seeing the Reps jump on the entitlement wagon, what with Bush's unfunded Plan B benefit for the elderly, and now their pushing for higher SS payments. Shows they care for old folks, and are the opposite of the death panel pushing Dems. Remember the gas station price wars? Sort of a reverse version. Politics is great stuff. God bless the USA!! --Vic snerk We can be sure the GOP, the same party that has tried repeatedly to kill Medicare, has the interests of seniors at heart. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:34:42 -0400, H the K
wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:09:05 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. I just went on SS this year, so I'm hoping the Reps will force the Dems to fix this up. Maybe end up with a 15% or so increase in my SS check. Preferably before the year is out. Best scenario would be for a Rep to actually introduce a bill, instead of simply being forced to vote for it. That would be sweet. Pretty nice seeing the Reps jump on the entitlement wagon, what with Bush's unfunded Plan B benefit for the elderly, and now their pushing for higher SS payments. Shows they care for old folks, and are the opposite of the death panel pushing Dems. Remember the gas station price wars? Sort of a reverse version. Politics is great stuff. God bless the USA!! --Vic snerk We can be sure the GOP, the same party that has tried repeatedly to kill Medicare, has the interests of seniors at heart. They do. Seniors are their base now. The Reps are vociferously defending Medicare, by accusing the Dems of undermining it. Like I said - SWEET! Never a better time to be an old folk, even at 62. Pretty confident now that SS and Medicare can only get better with the Dems and Reps in a bidding war. BTW, I just heard John McCain tell his town hall we have to ensure our kids and grand kids have SS and Medicare too! SWEET!!! --Vic |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:09:05 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. I just went on SS this year, so I'm hoping the Reps will force the Dems to fix this up. Maybe end up with a 15% or so increase in my SS check. Preferably before the year is out. Best scenario would be for a Rep to actually introduce a bill, instead of simply being forced to vote for it. That would be sweet. Pretty nice seeing the Reps jump on the entitlement wagon, what with Bush's unfunded Plan B benefit for the elderly, and now their pushing for higher SS payments. Shows they care for old folks, and are the opposite of the death panel pushing Dems. Remember the gas station price wars? Sort of a reverse version. Politics is great stuff. God bless the USA!! --Vic I got my first check April 1, this year, although being declared permanently totally disabled April 1, 2004. It took them that long to get it straight. Being awarded SS benefits is different than getting the check every month. Steve |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:57:26 -0700, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. Bush, the conservative, turned a budget surplus into a budget deficit. I'd say math wasn't one of his, or those who stood by and watched, strong points. Logic isn't a strong point of someone who would make a sweeping statement as you did. Gosh, I suppose that's enough reason for Obama to quadruple it. Just blame it on Bush. Don't you think you could come up with something other than the 'Bush Rationale' for the stupid **** Obama does? -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:13:48 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Jim wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. Bush, the conservative, turned a budget surplus into a budget deficit. I'd say math wasn't one of his, or those who stood by and watched, strong points. Logic isn't a strong point of someone who would make a sweeping statement as you did. Yep, like Harry on the left, that's what ****es me off. Wide sweeping generalizations just aren't good intelligent debate. Me for instance, I've got more math under my belt that many, many people, and always done well in it. As a matter of fact that's why I do what I do for a living. And guess what? I'm pretty damned liberal! Conservative=Good Liberal=Bad Oh, whoops, that's a wide sweeping generalization which isn't good intelligent debate. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Aug 25, 2:28*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:09:05 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. I just went on SS this year, so I'm hoping the Reps will force the Dems to fix this up. *Maybe end up with a 15% or so increase in my SS check. *Preferably before the year is out. *Best scenario would be for a Rep to actually introduce a bill, instead of simply being forced to vote for it. *That would be sweet. Pretty nice seeing the Reps jump on the entitlement wagon, what with Bush's unfunded Plan B benefit for the elderly, and now their pushing for higher SS payments. *Shows they care for old folks, and are the opposite of the death panel pushing Dems. dontcha just love the fairy tale world of the senile ultra right? 'death panels'...next he'll be telling us it's composed of goldilocks and the 3 bears |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com