Children toting firepower...
 

D 1 wrote:
Don White wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Don White wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...


At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey’s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow. “It is attempted
intimidation,” he wrote. “It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can
purchase
at a local gunshop.”

Bookman continues: “It also reflects a growing mindset among some
that
the government just isn’t listening and thus must be made to listen,
one way or the other. There’s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is
wrong.
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of a
gun.”
Sooner rather than later, one of the gun-toting right-wing
nincompoops is going to open fire or "have an accident" or get into
a brawl with law enforcement.

When these armed idiots show up at public meetings at which the
president is going to appear, it increases the workload of the
secret service and local police forces.
Some kind of federal law restricting weapons within a couple
thousand feet of anywhere the President of member of congress may be
is in order
This is something you couldn't trust the individual states to
pass/enforce.

I've been practicing so I can handle the impending invasion of the
Loogy/JustHate Zombies...


http://tinyurl.com/ma5znl


First five shot group at 100 yards from the new ZombieKiller Rifle. I
was plopped on a ground cloth and using the rifle's built-in sights.
Took a couple of shots first to sight in for elevation...there wasn't
any wind.

Tomorrow I'm going to try some shots with the new scope I just
attached. Once I get used to it, I should be able to put five between
the eyes of your typical zombie at 100 yards.


I have an old semi-auto 22 cal rifle with a 6x scope that I haven't
fired in 25 years or so.
I should get it out and do some practice myself.... just in case those
'zombies' make it across the border. ;-)



Whatever you do - don't clean the barrel! The first shot will do that
for you.

What an idiot! He thinks zombies are real.

Children toting firepower...
 

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 19, 3:30 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:09:28 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:







"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 19, 10:48 am, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 9:33 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...
At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey?s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans
coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow.
?It is attempted intimidation,? he wrote. ?It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry
the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can
purchase
at a local gunshop.?
Bookman continues: ?It also reflects a growing mindset among some
that
the government just isn?t listening and thus must be made to
listen,
one way or the other. There?s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person
in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is
wrong.
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of
a
gun.?
I suspect that the president is much safer with people who are
legally
carrying guns than with anyone else. In most states those who have
guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".- Hide
quoted
text -
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
reply: yeah, the NRA sent the *******.
they enabled the *******. they're a bunch of amoral, pot bellied beer
swilling misanthropes who think the constitution should be limited to
the 2nd amendment
Reply:
You forgot to mention they will be the last line of defense when the
government starts collecting books they don't like and piling them in the
streets to be burned. What sounds familiar about that?
Steve
NRA members will be the first to help the gov't collect the books and
burn them. They don't like them smart alecky folks.

who was it that said 'when a dictatorship comes to america, it won't
be with the hammer and sickle...it'll come wrapped in the flag, and
carrying a cross'....

aesop?

Who said the man who controls the election is the man who counts the votes.
Lots of SEIU employees in every polling place I have worked for the last
twenty years.

Those green shirts would make mighty keen targets... Pick a couple off
and they would scatter like the cowardly dogs they are. Bunch of fat
lazy beer swilling wife beaters, nobody would miss them.


Scotty, did you happen to catch Hannity last night? Those conservatives
at the town hall meetings that you claim were just concerned citizens?
Hannity had the guy on that "organized" them. He stated that they were
there to disrupt the meetings to the point that nothing gets said.
Precious, huh?

Children toting firepower...
 

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 19, 3:30 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:09:28 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:







"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 19, 10:48 am, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 9:33 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...
At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey?s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans
coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow.
?It is attempted intimidation,? he wrote. ?It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry
the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can
purchase
at a local gunshop.?
Bookman continues: ?It also reflects a growing mindset among some
that
the government just isn?t listening and thus must be made to
listen,
one way or the other. There?s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person
in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is
wrong.
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of
a
gun.?
I suspect that the president is much safer with people who are
legally
carrying guns than with anyone else. In most states those who have
guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".- Hide
quoted
text -
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
reply: yeah, the NRA sent the *******.
they enabled the *******. they're a bunch of amoral, pot bellied beer
swilling misanthropes who think the constitution should be limited to
the 2nd amendment
Reply:
You forgot to mention they will be the last line of defense when the
government starts collecting books they don't like and piling them in the
streets to be burned. What sounds familiar about that?
Steve
NRA members will be the first to help the gov't collect the books and
burn them. They don't like them smart alecky folks.

who was it that said 'when a dictatorship comes to america, it won't
be with the hammer and sickle...it'll come wrapped in the flag, and
carrying a cross'....

aesop?

Who said the man who controls the election is the man who counts the votes.
Lots of SEIU employees in every polling place I have worked for the last
twenty years.

Those green shirts would make mighty keen targets... Pick a couple off
and they would scatter like the cowardly dogs they are. Bunch of fat
lazy beer swilling wife beaters, nobody would miss them.


Scotty, did you happen to catch Hannity last night? Those conservatives
at the town hall meetings that you claim were just concerned citizens?
Hannity had the guy on that "organized" them. He stated that they were
there to disrupt the meetings to the point that nothing gets said.
Precious, huh?

Yeah, did you see it the night they showed La Raza at Colombia
University, forcefully driving the MinuteMen and their speakers from the
building only after they (La Raza) had their say on stage? Did you see
the attacks on Buchanon, Gingrich, etc where angry mobs with signs
forced them from the stage?? Did you see the SIEU cowards beating the
black kid for selling buttons?? I am still looking for the video of
grandma stopping a congressman from speaking or threatening his life???
Grandma hasn't done anything bue exercise free speech, nothing violent,
nothing to take away any body else s civil rights...

--
Wafa free since 2009

Children toting firepower...
 

On Aug 20, 8:14*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

if only i had the time. i work for a living.

I guess you are not serious about your stated desire. If you were
serious you would find the time.

Now we know you are just a whiner.-

uh, no. i was a believer in the free market. unlike you, however, i
can handle reality and don't need to retreat into fantasy.

hope your mom told you to quit sucking your thumb or you're going to
need braces

Children toting firepower...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 19, 11:56 pm, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Aug 19, 8:33 pm, "SteveB" wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message

and then got idiots like you to tell us how fortunate we are to be
raped by the rich

reply: Lemme ask you this, Batman. During all this, what were YOU doing
to
monitor and direct your funds?

Huh?

Steve

ROFLMAO!! i love this logic. the children who suck the dicks of the
rich think that the middle class should

1. WORK for a living
2 give ALL their money to the rich
3 TRUST corporate america to guard their 401K investments
4 blame THEMSELVES when corporate america rapes the living **** out of
the middle class

christ...what a scam the rich have going...

reply: Don't know about you, Vern, but I know where my money is and why.

i don't know about you, but i bought the 'free market' line pushed by
right wingers. i PAID THE FREE MARKET GUYS to do what they SAID they
would do: protect the middle class

i love your logic. there's no way to prove you wrong. if the market
succeeds, it's because the market cant fail. and when it fails, it's
your fault

god, no wonder the rich love folks like you.

And that includes $400k frozen right now in first deeds and land we cannot
dump. I know what all my asssets are doing, and my wife was a CPA. If your
stuff took a ****, it was because no one was watching it, particularly
YOU.

yeah go figure. me and alan greenspan, george bush, dick cheney, the
SEC and a hundred million middle class wage earners.

You didn't get stuck in the "middle class". You chose to stay there.


IOW it's never the fault of the rich. it's ALWAYS the fault of the
middle class.

as i said...the rich know there will always be folks like you to suck
their dicks.

reply: You still seem to be stuck in ad hominem attacks. You are not worth
debating, as you cannot get over your bitterness of being a failure in your
own life, not managing your finances better, not following your investments
better, and now seeming to claim to belong to some class of people who
deserves compensation.

It must suck to be you.

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

"BAR" wrote in message
...
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy.
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-

and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.

in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.

As he is entitled to do, but is too stupid to understand or learn. (He
slept through the classes the first time ..... civics, government, etc.)

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 20, 7:19 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it
dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.
ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy.
uh huh.
It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.-

and it's the NRA that opposes any restrictions on guns at all. it
opposed instant checks. it opposed taking guns away from crazy people,
wife abusers, etc.

in fact gun control is meaningless. we need to repeal the 2nd
amendment and ban guns completely.

If that is your desire I suggest you get started on the process to amend
the Constitution.-

if only i had the time. i work for a living.

reply: Wow, that's a plausible excuse. So, what it amounts to is that you
really do not believe in what you belive in enough to work to make it
happen. Do I have it right?

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 19, 9:59 pm, JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...







On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:17 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:54 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally

33 dead people as a result.

thanks to the NRA

The university itself is admitting tonight on the news that it
dropped
the ball on this guy. He was known to be crazy as a ****house rat but
they never told anyone so his background check came back clean.

ah. well. that makes it OK then. it's OK if crazy people have guns to
slaughter 33 people, as long as they didn't tell anyone they're crazy.

uh huh.

It is not OK but you either have to loosen privacy laws about crazy
people or risk the danger of them buying guns. BTW the NRA says the
instant check should include mental health records. It is the left who
says that should remain private.

OOOOPs. damn those facts... Doesn't matter, they will still blame the
right, the news will back them up, and the uninformed will eat it up...

--

the NRA wouldnt know a fact if it walked into NRA HQ and sat on the
chairman's desk


reply: pot .............. kettle ..................

Children toting firepower...
 

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:52:57 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:

Scopes and lasers are for people who can't shoot.

Scopes are quite useful to those of advancing years whose eyes are not
what they once were. They extend the period just after sunset when the
deer, for example, show themselves, as they can be used in dimmer
light than iron sights. The iron sights have advantages: lighter and
more compact, more rugged [usually], cheaper.

Casady

I agree. But in the context of the conversation, the poster was not even
using the proper terminology for iron sights, showing a lack of knowledge.
There are a lot of people who own guns who really don't understand them, or
are able to use them with much proficiency. They always want bigger
magazines and larger caliber, plus anything other gimmick that will
compensate for lack of skill and experience.

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

On Aug 20, 11:01*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message



IOW it's never the fault of the rich. it's ALWAYS the fault of the
middle class.

as i said...the rich know there will always be folks like you to suck
their dicks.

reply: *You still seem to be stuck in ad hominem attacks.

blah blah blah...

*You are not worth
debating, as you cannot get over your bitterness of being a failure in your
own life, not managing your finances better, not following your investments

again, you seem to be unable to grasp a simple fact:

your argument is unprovable. if someone makes alot of money it proves
the rich are right. if they lose alot of money, the rich had nothing
to do with that.

i would expect such an argument of a 5 year old. you're unable to
function as an adult. you are unable to understand that markets fail.
those words simply are not in your vocabulary.


better, and now seeming to claim to belong to some class of people who
deserves compensation.

It must suck to be you.


yeah, being an adult is tough. glad you aren't one.