|
OT Cold winter...
|
OT Cold winter...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JLH OPAof7 wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:08:44 -0400, NotNow wrote: Lu Powell wrote: South Dakota It's late fall and the Indians on a remote reservation in South Dakota asked their new chief if the coming winter was going to be cold or mild. Since he was a chief in a modern society, he had never been taught the old secrets. When he looked at the sky, he couldn't tell what the winter was going to be like. Nevertheless, to be on the safe side, he told his tribe that the winter was indeed going to be cold and that the members of the village should collect firewood to be prepared. But, being a practical leader, after several days, he got an idea. He went to the phone booth, called the National Weather Service and asked, 'Is the coming winter going to be cold?' 'It looks like this winter is going to be quite cold,' the meteorologist at the weather service responded. So the chief went back to his people and told them to collect even more firewood in order to be prepared. A week later, he called the National Weather Service again. 'Does it still look like it is going to be a very cold winter?' 'Yes,' the man at National Weather Service again replied, 'it's going to be a very cold winter.' The chief again went back to his people and ordered them to collect every scrap of firewood they could find. Two weeks later, the chief called the National Weather Service again. 'Are you absolutely sure that the winter is going to be very cold?' 'Absolutely,' the man replied. 'It's looking more and more like it is going to be one of the coldest winters we've ever seen.' 'How can you be so sure?' the chief asked. The weatherman replied, 'The Indians are collecting firewood like crazy.' Remember this whenever you get advice from a government official! Playing reverse Harry again? Jeees, Loog. Ease up. Is a joke too much for you? Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. What names did I call anyone? You called us all "Harry"... Now I am just waiting for the "winger" tag just because we have different opinions on things.. No I didn't. I called your concept reverseHarryanism! Oh, "Is" is the new black;) -- Wafa free since 2009 |
OT Cold winter...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7 wrote: Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a highly accurate descriptor. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed, all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm Emanual... There you go, defining all liberals into a very narrow catagory. Hummm. I didn't say liberals at all... Just talking about some of them. BTW, you asked me for a list of sleazy repubs last week, and I gave it to you, wasn't it long enough? Not at all. There are hundreds of them. Would you like me to post them for you? I think the issue was everything good or bad, based on party affiliation.. I think my list disproved that propaganda... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
OT Cold winter...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article 523eb17a-073b-4857-87cb-86b447d2eff6@ 18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7 wrote: Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a highly accurate descriptor. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed, all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm Emanual... At the same time, reverse harry is kind of a compliment.. I mean, being against everything Harry stands for is the only way for a thinking person to be... It's easy to be reverseharry. Just remember, everything liberal = bad, everything conservative = good. Besides, I really resent the idea that we can't disagree, no name calling, no lies, no disrespect, just questions and a different opinion and still get compared to WAFA... None of "us" have been calling you or Thunder or Gene any names... So I still suggest that you shouldn't be calling grown men with respectful differences in opinion, "harry" in any form... If you and John would take a step back, and look at your posts the last couple of weeks, you'd see. Others here see it. I just have not been calling names... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
OT Cold winter...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7 wrote: Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a highly accurate descriptor. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed, all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm Emanual... There you go, defining all liberals into a very narrow catagory. Hummm. I didn't say liberals at all... Just talking about some of them. BTW, you asked me for a list of sleazy repubs last week, and I gave it to you, wasn't it long enough? Not at all. There are hundreds of them. Would you like me to post them for you? I think the issue was everything good or bad, based on party affiliation.. I think my list disproved that propaganda... Better watch it, or JustaLoogy will start to threaten you. (Isn't it great fun when these two morons argue with each other?) |
OT Cold winter...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article 523eb17a-073b-4857-87cb-86b447d2eff6@ 18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7 wrote: Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a highly accurate descriptor. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed, all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm Emanual... At the same time, reverse harry is kind of a compliment.. I mean, being against everything Harry stands for is the only way for a thinking person to be... It's easy to be reverseharry. Just remember, everything liberal = bad, everything conservative = good. Besides, I really resent the idea that we can't disagree, no name calling, no lies, no disrespect, just questions and a different opinion and still get compared to WAFA... None of "us" have been calling you or Thunder or Gene any names... So I still suggest that you shouldn't be calling grown men with respectful differences in opinion, "harry" in any form... If you and John would take a step back, and look at your posts the last couple of weeks, you'd see. Others here see it. I just have not been calling names... And neither have I! |
OT Cold winter...
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:11:36 -0400, JustWait
wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article 523eb17a-073b-4857-87cb-86b447d2eff6@ 18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7 wrote: Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a highly accurate descriptor. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed, all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm Emanual... At the same time, reverse harry is kind of a compliment.. I mean, being against everything Harry stands for is the only way for a thinking person to be... It's easy to be reverseharry. Just remember, everything liberal = bad, everything conservative = good. Besides, I really resent the idea that we can't disagree, no name calling, no lies, no disrespect, just questions and a different opinion and still get compared to WAFA... None of "us" have been calling you or Thunder or Gene any names... So I still suggest that you shouldn't be calling grown men with respectful differences in opinion, "harry" in any form... Hell, let Loogy call his little names. If I'd voted for Obama I'd be feeling pretty miserable also. I'd much rather be the reverse of Harry than the same as Harry. Talk about being miserable! |
OT Cold winter...
JLH OPAof7 wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:11:36 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article 523eb17a-073b-4857-87cb-86b447d2eff6@ 18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7 wrote: Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a highly accurate descriptor. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed, all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm Emanual... At the same time, reverse harry is kind of a compliment.. I mean, being against everything Harry stands for is the only way for a thinking person to be... It's easy to be reverseharry. Just remember, everything liberal = bad, everything conservative = good. Besides, I really resent the idea that we can't disagree, no name calling, no lies, no disrespect, just questions and a different opinion and still get compared to WAFA... None of "us" have been calling you or Thunder or Gene any names... So I still suggest that you shouldn't be calling grown men with respectful differences in opinion, "harry" in any form... Hell, let Loogy call his little names. If I'd voted for Obama I'd be feeling pretty miserable also. I'd much rather be the reverse of Harry than the same as Harry. Talk about being miserable! Show me where I've called anyone any names, John. |
OT Cold winter...
On Aug 17, 10:01*am, NotNow wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Aug 16, 8:51 am, Gene wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:03:39 -0400, JLH OPAof7 wrote: Wait until someone starts calling you a dumbfoching moron before calling them your pet names. If you are referring to, "reverse Harry" it isn't a pet name, it is a highly accurate descriptor. -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1171 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'. No names be called, no lies be told, no re-written cut and paste needed, all that is necessary is for one not to goosestep to Al Gore and Rahm Emanual... There you go, defining all liberals into a very narrow catagory. I'm glad I'm not in there. I see liberal thinkers and then I see flaming liberals. There is a HUGE difference! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com