Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?


It's the cross I have to bear here. :)

On Aug 17, 9:37*pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
*If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently *tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. *The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. *If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. *My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?

It's the cross I have to bear here. *:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????

Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????

Plonkity plonk plonk plonk. No one is more deserving.

On Aug 18, 1:23*pm, J i m wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
*If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors..
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently *tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. *The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. *If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. *My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. *:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????

Plonkity plonk plonk plonk. No one is more deserving.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's good...plonk yourself, then we'll hear no more of your **** off-
topic posts. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAingen

Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 18, 1:23 pm, J i m wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????
Plonkity plonk plonk plonk. No one is more deserving.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's good...plonk yourself, then we'll hear no more of your **** off-
topic posts. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAingen


I wouldn't worry about flajim...he's just another of the right-wing
cowards here.

Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????


Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of
little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as
JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out,
one of them will top the other.

See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was
lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a
convenient physician. I think it was because he either had no health
insurance, or crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state.
Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of
people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and
their family members approached 100 per cent.

JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he
didn't have.

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield
Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in
the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so
I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I
tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying
it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????


Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of
little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as
JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one
of them will top the other.

See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was
lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient
physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or
crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state.
Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of
people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and
their family members approached 100 per cent.

JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't
have.


Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account?

Don White wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield
Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in
the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so
I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I
tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying
it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????

Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of
little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as
JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one
of them will top the other.

See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was
lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient
physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or
crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state.
Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of
people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and
their family members approached 100 per cent.

JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't
have.


Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account?




I don't recall who the care was for...maybe for Mrs. JustHate, who was
more than a bit upset over the sight of that kiddie motorcycle in her
kitchen.

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:56:32 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
om...
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield
Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in
the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so
I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I
tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying
it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????


Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of
little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as
JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one
of them will top the other.

See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was
lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient
physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or
crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state.
Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of
people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and
their family members approached 100 per cent.

JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't
have.


Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account?


How's your mom, Don?
--
John H

"BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!"

"Proprietario di Guzzi" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:56:32 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
news:mLudnVYxfKvujhbXnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be
using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its
successors.
That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more
accurate than automatic.
I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other"
The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon
firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that
theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt
considers
opening.
A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield
Armory
reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight
groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in
the
accuracy of either.
Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I
wanted
something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box,
so
I
did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles.
Seriously,
the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who
shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels,
actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers.
I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would
perform
properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some
CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of
"mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a
rifle
I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I
tried
one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I
was
shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of
practice.
So I bought one. Mine looks like this:
http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php
It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock.
Shoots great...unbelievable, actually.
Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40.
Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups!
Probably
work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too.
The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your
"friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and
performance. If it did, they would have never bought one.
Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than
buying
it.
I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass....
Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo?
It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact
that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth?????


Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of
little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as
JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out,
one
of them will top the other.

See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was
lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a
convenient
physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or
crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state.
Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of
people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and
their family members approached 100 per cent.

JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he
didn't
have.


Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account?


How's your mom, Don?
--
John H



How's your daughter, Johnny.
Almost time for another beg-a-thon?