Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:51:41 -0400, BAR wrote:
H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: HHS: Insurance Companies Encourage Employees to "Revoke Sick People's Health Coverage" By David S. Hilzenrath Washington Post You might have known that insurers can deny health coverage based on preexisting medical conditions, but here’s something else to worry about: They can take away the coverage you thought you had when actually need it, the government says. The Department of Health and Human Services put a spotlight on that practice Tuesday in its continuing campaign to build support for an overhaul of health insurance. “When a person is diagnosed with an expensive condition such as cancer, some insurance companies review his/her initial health status questionnaire,” the HHS said in a posting at HealthReform.Gov. In most states, insurance companies can retroactively cancel individuals' policies if any condition was not disclosed when the policy was obtained, "even if the medical condition is unrelated, and even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” “Coverage can also be revoked for all members of a family, even if only one family member failed to disclose a medical condition,” HHS said. Your failure to disclose requested and relevant information to obtain an insurance policy is called fraud. Read the whole piece, ****-for-brains, and try to understand it. Do you know what the phrase "...even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” Buy an errors and omissions rider. Expecting a marginally educated population to understand they need an E&O rider? Jesus. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:23:03 -0700, jps wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:51:41 -0400, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: HHS: Insurance Companies Encourage Employees to "Revoke Sick People's Health Coverage" By David S. Hilzenrath Washington Post You might have known that insurers can deny health coverage based on preexisting medical conditions, but here’s something else to worry about: They can take away the coverage you thought you had when actually need it, the government says. The Department of Health and Human Services put a spotlight on that practice Tuesday in its continuing campaign to build support for an overhaul of health insurance. “When a person is diagnosed with an expensive condition such as cancer, some insurance companies review his/her initial health status questionnaire,” the HHS said in a posting at HealthReform.Gov. In most states, insurance companies can retroactively cancel individuals' policies if any condition was not disclosed when the policy was obtained, "even if the medical condition is unrelated, and even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” “Coverage can also be revoked for all members of a family, even if only one family member failed to disclose a medical condition,” HHS said. Your failure to disclose requested and relevant information to obtain an insurance policy is called fraud. Read the whole piece, ****-for-brains, and try to understand it. Do you know what the phrase "...even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” Buy an errors and omissions rider. Expecting a marginally educated population to understand they need an E&O rider? Jesus. The marginally educated voted Obama into power. If they cannot understand, then Obama should be out there with explanations. Sheeesh! ('Cause I'm not as religiously oriented as you.) -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:07:29 -0400, JLH
wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:23:03 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:51:41 -0400, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: HHS: Insurance Companies Encourage Employees to "Revoke Sick People's Health Coverage" By David S. Hilzenrath Washington Post You might have known that insurers can deny health coverage based on preexisting medical conditions, but here’s something else to worry about: They can take away the coverage you thought you had when actually need it, the government says. The Department of Health and Human Services put a spotlight on that practice Tuesday in its continuing campaign to build support for an overhaul of health insurance. “When a person is diagnosed with an expensive condition such as cancer, some insurance companies review his/her initial health status questionnaire,” the HHS said in a posting at HealthReform.Gov. In most states, insurance companies can retroactively cancel individuals' policies if any condition was not disclosed when the policy was obtained, "even if the medical condition is unrelated, and even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” “Coverage can also be revoked for all members of a family, even if only one family member failed to disclose a medical condition,” HHS said. Your failure to disclose requested and relevant information to obtain an insurance policy is called fraud. Read the whole piece, ****-for-brains, and try to understand it. Do you know what the phrase "...even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” Buy an errors and omissions rider. Expecting a marginally educated population to understand they need an E&O rider? Jesus. The marginally educated voted Obama into power. If they cannot understand, then Obama should be out there with explanations. Sheeesh! ('Cause I'm not as religiously oriented as you.) The uneducated voted for McCain. The uneducated voted for Bush, twice! Thank god the marginally educated prevailed in the last election. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:07:29 -0400, JLH wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:23:03 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:51:41 -0400, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: HHS: Insurance Companies Encourage Employees to "Revoke Sick People's Health Coverage" By David S. Hilzenrath Washington Post You might have known that insurers can deny health coverage based on preexisting medical conditions, but here’s something else to worry about: They can take away the coverage you thought you had when actually need it, the government says. The Department of Health and Human Services put a spotlight on that practice Tuesday in its continuing campaign to build support for an overhaul of health insurance. “When a person is diagnosed with an expensive condition such as cancer, some insurance companies review his/her initial health status questionnaire,” the HHS said in a posting at HealthReform.Gov. In most states, insurance companies can retroactively cancel individuals' policies if any condition was not disclosed when the policy was obtained, "even if the medical condition is unrelated, and even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” “Coverage can also be revoked for all members of a family, even if only one family member failed to disclose a medical condition,” HHS said. Your failure to disclose requested and relevant information to obtain an insurance policy is called fraud. Read the whole piece, ****-for-brains, and try to understand it. Do you know what the phrase "...even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” Buy an errors and omissions rider. Expecting a marginally educated population to understand they need an E&O rider? Jesus. The marginally educated voted Obama into power. If they cannot understand, then Obama should be out there with explanations. Sheeesh! ('Cause I'm not as religiously oriented as you.) The uneducated voted for McCain. The uneducated voted for Bush, twice! Thank god the marginally educated prevailed in the last election. Indeed. We have an example of two "uneducateds" here promoting the idea of "death panels," Herring and The Freak. i only see The Freak's responses to Herring, who apparently is working overtime to convince someone, anyone, that a voluntary consultation has become mandatory. Retards, both of them. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:35:07 -0400, H the K
wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:07:29 -0400, JLH wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:23:03 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:51:41 -0400, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: BAR wrote: H the K wrote: HHS: Insurance Companies Encourage Employees to "Revoke Sick People's Health Coverage" By David S. Hilzenrath Washington Post You might have known that insurers can deny health coverage based on preexisting medical conditions, but here’s something else to worry about: They can take away the coverage you thought you had when actually need it, the government says. The Department of Health and Human Services put a spotlight on that practice Tuesday in its continuing campaign to build support for an overhaul of health insurance. “When a person is diagnosed with an expensive condition such as cancer, some insurance companies review his/her initial health status questionnaire,” the HHS said in a posting at HealthReform.Gov. In most states, insurance companies can retroactively cancel individuals' policies if any condition was not disclosed when the policy was obtained, "even if the medical condition is unrelated, and even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” “Coverage can also be revoked for all members of a family, even if only one family member failed to disclose a medical condition,” HHS said. Your failure to disclose requested and relevant information to obtain an insurance policy is called fraud. Read the whole piece, ****-for-brains, and try to understand it. Do you know what the phrase "...even if the person was not aware of the condition at the time.” Buy an errors and omissions rider. Expecting a marginally educated population to understand they need an E&O rider? Jesus. The marginally educated voted Obama into power. If they cannot understand, then Obama should be out there with explanations. Sheeesh! ('Cause I'm not as religiously oriented as you.) The uneducated voted for McCain. The uneducated voted for Bush, twice! Thank god the marginally educated prevailed in the last election. Indeed. We have an example of two "uneducateds" here promoting the idea of "death panels," Herring and The Freak. i only see The Freak's responses to Herring, who apparently is working overtime to convince someone, anyone, that a voluntary consultation has become mandatory. Retards, both of them. Retards aren't necessarily stupid. These two don't deserve to be elevated to the term. Corporate death panels have been reduced to computer prograrms. They compute the risk of losing money, singling those out who they can drop before they become a liability. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
End Corporate Welfare Now! | ASA | |||
Corporate America gone amok... | General | |||
Corporate America gone amok... | General | |||
Corporate America gone amok... | General | |||
Corporate America gone amok... | General |